Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:33 am
Hmm? It was a response to Shos and serrapaladin who both asked why I voted for Syryana.In post 398, Voidedmafia wrote:Was this directed at molla or Parama?
Mafiascum.net
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Khan's Wacky Xylbot II Mafia (Mini 1441) (Game Over)
Page 17 of 47
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:05 pm
So Wind-Up and Untrod showed up after Rufflig asked for them to be prodded, yet neither had received them yet. That says enough.
Also, @Parama, why aren't you voting yet?
Also, @Parama, why aren't you voting yet?
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:21 am
Hes waiting for another quickhammer mislynxh
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:32 am
the hell, am I not voting?
fixed
!vote shos
fixed
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:13 am
I believe that puts shos at L-1.
And no, you weren't Parama.
*sigh*
And no, you weren't Parama.
*sigh*
!prod serrapaladin
!prod BBmolla
!prod Syryana
!prod wind-up
!xmafia vote deadline
!prod BBmolla
!prod Syryana
!prod wind-up
!xmafia vote deadline
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:33 am
Let'sall decide between UT and shos shall we
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:25 pm
You rang, Ruff?
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:41 pm
I did, yes. If none of you have anything left to say or questions to ask, perhaps you might vote for a deadline in hopes of moving this game along? Or we could just wait for wind-up.
(Ok, shos isn't on either wagon, but I very much doubt that he is going to vote for himself).
@wind-up:
You're pretty much the lone hold out on the 2 major wagons. Where do you stand? You haven't mentioned either player, yet.(Ok, shos isn't on either wagon, but I very much doubt that he is going to vote for himself).
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:05 pm
Nah, I don't really see UT. I could go for Syr, but shos is fine.
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:08 pm
I'm cool with voting for a DL. Or just lynching shos/UT. Whichever way.
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:17 pm
Im.in l-1 and still afaik.nobody.has.made any real accusations against me except for "he is scum". I really cant defend this. Since im in l-1 tho, ill claim. Gimme a minute cuz i.dont remember the name
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:20 pm
So im an inventor, i give people powers. I gave one to voided last night whicj is wierd why.he didnt understand me;. I also crumbed on post 1 that o make uo stuff
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:12 pm
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:16 pm
I approve of your fakeclaim
voided where art thou
voided where art thou
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:59 pm
Oh, that was you? I did wonder why I suddenly got an ability last night, but I wasn't about to accept your hints like that (I will admit to not quite getting it the first read, thoughIn post 411, shos wrote:So im an inventor, i give people powers. I gave one to voided last night whicj is wierd why.he didnt understand me;. I also crumbed on post 1 that o make uo stuff
)Shos is town if the claim is true, lynch UT or Parama.
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:17 pm
doesn't prove jack shit about his alignment, scum inventor is a role
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:18 pm
!xmafia help Inventor
!xmafia help Malfunctioning Inventor
!xmafia help Malfunctioning Inventor
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:22 pm
I'm more inclined to think he's town, though. Bias, possibly, but still.In post 415, Untrod Tripod wrote:doesn't prove jack shit about his alignment, scum inventor is a role
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:23 pm
>acknowledges bias
>doesnt' change opinion
starting to think voided might be the scum here, would be why he didn't mention the ability until just now too I guess but that's kind of reaching
>doesnt' change opinion
starting to think voided might be the scum here, would be why he didn't mention the ability until just now too I guess but that's kind of reaching
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:25 pm
That is not scummy on its own and you should know that, Parama.In post 418, Parama wrote:>acknowledges bias
>doesnt' change opinion
starting to think voided might be the scum here, would be why he didn't mention the ability until just now too I guess but that's kind of reaching
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:30 pm
how is that bias? it's just you assuming that inventor means town for no reason
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:32 pm
Bias from being the receiver of his item, I mean.In post 420, Untrod Tripod wrote:how is that bias? it's just you assuming that inventor means town for no reason
And note I said he's town if his claim is true (which would be further proved after tonight). For right now it makes him less of a lynch than you or Parama.
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:46 pm
how does you receiving an item make him town?
hint: it doesn't
his role is independent of his alignment (I'm just going to go ahead and assume the inventor thing is true and you're not lying about receiving an item) and you trying to link the two doesn't make a whole lot of sense given the fact that scum inventor is not significantly less likely than town inventor
hint: it doesn't
his role is independent of his alignment (I'm just going to go ahead and assume the inventor thing is true and you're not lying about receiving an item) and you trying to link the two doesn't make a whole lot of sense given the fact that scum inventor is not significantly less likely than town inventor
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:48 pm
although given the fact that you think that your inability to separate role from alignment constitutes a bias, I might be wasting my time here
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:45 pm
Why would a scum inventor tarfet townies, lol. Id target myself or my partners.
Anyway i still sont recall any case against me and would like to know why i was voted.
Anyway i still sont recall any case against me and would like to know why i was voted.