Mafiascum.net

We have only until tomorrow. Marquis and I should both claim, and you can lynch whoever is the best option. (Hint: Im pretty sure it will be him.)

No, we should settle on one player and make only them claim. We already have two claimed power roles out and now you're sounding almost excited at the possibility of revealing more such claims!

Hangover prevents me from catching up.

In post 401, ChannelDelibird wrote:No, we should settle on one player and make only them claim. We already have two claimed power roles out and now you're sounding almost excited at the possibility of revealing more such claims!

Your reading comprehension skills are weak.

If no one comes in to vote Marquis, then I will claim to move people off my wagon to prevent a no-lynch.

fferyllt, Syryana, what are you thinking?

In post 404, LnGrrrR wrote:If no one comes in to vote Marquis, then I will claim to move people off my wagon to prevent a no-lynch.

That's basically a softclaim right there, saying that your role is good enough to not lynch. If you were VT people would have no added incentive to get off your wagon.

Yes, Toomai. I wouldn't have claimed normally, but Channel and Amrun have their head up their butts.

Also, Im pretty sure there is a serial killer in this game.

In post 407, LnGrrrR wrote:Yes, Toomai. I wouldn't have claimed normally, but Channel and Amrun have their head up their butts.

Also, Im pretty sure there is a serial killer in this game.

OK, so given that you're claiming a PR, what's your take on the dual JOAT claims?

My take is that one of them are probably lying. Look at my skepticism when Jason claimed, and how much I pressed Channel on the viability of both of them.

I am just going to claim now since half the game is lurky anyways.

I am nearly Headless Nick, a one shot Doc, and Hogwart aligned. (Curious that neither of our two claims mentioned anything about being aligned.) I can try to protect someone each night from the Basilisk: if I do so, then they get stumped. If not successful, I can keep trying. Once the basilisk dies, I become a normal 1 shot doc.

Given the wording, I have a feeling the Basilisk is an SK instead of straight scum.

@PA, given some time to think anout it, Stubbs claim is probably the "fake" one, since mine is underpowered as Jason's is. (Not a "normal" doc), plus his claim semi-conflicts with mine (Docshot). That said, if we are stuck with one shot docs and weak investigative powers, scum better not be "normally" powered.

Oh and starting to doubt Channel's towniness. It should be pretty obvious that I wasn't "excited" about having to claim, since I have been trying to throw Amrun and him off of me all game with not-so-subtle hints. Channel seems less sincere; Amrun just seems to be too stuck on how awesome he is at reading people.

UNVOTE:

'hogwarts aligned" + scum wouldn't put that much effort into adding basilisk mentions into their fakeclaims + it fits perfectly with the flavor = town (unless nexus gave all scum full fakeclaims)

@Marquis, I know it sucks, but you need to either come up with a really strong case on someone ASAP or claim. We need to lynch tomorrow.

UNVOTE:

My reads are all screwy, and if I live until tomorrow I will re read, but for now:

VOTE: Stubbs

This is a dumb vote, because of all the claims we should be letting live it is him (having the strongest claim). I will move my vote if needed. But Im starting to think Stubbs claim is off.

In post 409, LnGrrrR wrote:My take is that one of them are probably lying. Look at my skepticism when Jason claimed, and how much I pressed Channel on the viability of both of them.

I am just going to claim now since half the game is lurky anyways.

I am nearly Headless Nick, a one shot Doc, and Hogwart aligned. (Curious that neither of our two claims mentioned anything about being aligned.) I can try to protect someone each night from the Basilisk: if I do so, then they get stumped. If not successful, I can keep trying. Once the basilisk dies, I become a normal 1 shot doc.

Given the wording, I have a feeling the Basilisk is an SK instead of straight scum.

What does stumped mean?

Oh, did you mean tree-stumped?

I don't think the basilisk is SK considering it is directly aligned with Voldemort. Perhaps, it is some sort of special mafia kill. I buy this claim since a student does see the basilisk through Nick and they get petrified instead of dying.

@F-16, Yes tree stumped.

I will use my doc protect on one of the claimed PR's. I will let the scum WIFOM.

Why would you do that when you suspect one of the claimed PRs of being scum?

You are voting someone you would protect?

Because they should be able to prove their claim tomorrow. And it's better to protect claimed PRs than potential VTs. One of them is probably telling the truth, which means scum is going for them.

Setting any sort of explicit target means that scum could NK an unclaimed person, and introduce WIFOM to get the PR lynched.

In post 419, fferyllt wrote:You are voting someone you would protect?

I could be wrong. Im not egotistical enough to know for sure he is lying and not try to protect. Frankly, his abilities are much stronger than Jason or I's, and if he is telling the truth, lynching him would be a huge blow to town.

In post 419, fferyllt wrote:You are voting someone you would protect?

^ Pretty much this.

In post 318, penguin_alien wrote:

In post 312, ChannelDelibird wrote:Losing a post sucks but you do need to explain your reaction to Stubbs's claim at an absolute minimum.

PEdit: p_a, why does one have to make more sense than the other?

Two JOAT claims. Could be town-town, town-scum, or scum-scum. Considering how much sense either of them makes is kind of the point. Jason not addressing the other JOAT claim is sketchy, and I'd rather not speculate further until he does, as it seems like we have more time now.

P_A, on reread this post kind of pings, that you included scum-scum.

What made you think this could be a possibility?

I doubt both are scum After all why would they do that to themselves? More likely one is scum and one is actually town.