Mafiascum.net

This kind of thing happens in newbie games, but here it's ridiculous because there are no newbies.

RMarie:

Who is scum? Why?

Regals:

Who is scum? Why?

IV:

Who is scum? Why?

Cats:

Not much to do here. The people I want to ask the most questions of are the ones who are most inactive.

While we're here, I must know: how much of your unwillingness to vote is based off of the fact that the people who are most suspect are the most inactive?

Maybe 70%. The rest is the fact that there's more of them than there could be scum and until they say something I can't scale them well enough to have a scummiest read.

Well, gotta start somewhere I suppose: Rach, you say you're back from being V/LA and yet you have no comment at all about the various things that have happened in the meantime, or even a reason why you've no comment. This isn't looking any better than the previous day. Your last post that wasn't 'I am/have been absent for this reason...' was on . It's fine you've been V/LA but that much time really warrants some input on return or an expected time we'll have to wait for said input.

VOTE: RachMarie

Honestly there's just so much going on and I don't want to keep dragging you all down.



Would've worked another day. Hope to play with some of you soon in a game where I can participate more hopefully.

sup ns, you scum?

Oh. You.

ns I hope you're done artificially changing your meta by actively being a non-contributor to the game. This game has enough of a lack of contributions by the playerlist for you to be an active and helpful member of the game.

In post 407, Wisdom wrote:sup ns, you scum?

That's you who always gets the scum slot upon replacing in, not me.

In post 408, RayFrost wrote:Oh. You.

ns I hope you're done artificially changing your meta by actively being a non-contributor to the game. This game has enough of a lack of contributions by the playerlist for you to be an active and helpful member of the game.

Yeah, I'll read and then give my reads later

This time it isn't me, therefore it's you?

Nope.

Why were you so waffley yesterday? I don't particularly remember you being so waffley in our games.

Townreads on RM, Rayfrost, Cats

Nulls are ER

Scumz are Wis and Arc. Discuss.

VOTE: Wis

My vote's good where it is right now.

No real reasons, no real commentary, no real anything.

In post 416, RayFrost wrote:My vote's good where it is right now.

No real reasons, no real commentary, no real anything.

Cool. Lemme know when you realize I'm obvtown.

So basically you haven't stopped the artificial "not going to ever really contribute anything ur dumb if u call me scum" playstyle.

Good to know. Die.

In post 418, RayFrost wrote:So basically you haven't stopped the artificial "not going to ever really contribute anything ur dumb if u call me scum" playstyle.

Nah, I don't particularly care to debate with someone tunneling so moronically. Sad thing is, you're probably town.

Good to know. Die.

In post 394, Wisdom wrote:VOTE: Evil Regals

Stop ignoring me

Didn't ignore you. Just didn't have time since I was falling asleep to reply to everyone, but wanted to explain my reasoning to AA.

I'm not sure about my reads.

I have AA as town. Ray I think is leaning town.
Rach could maybe be scum which is based on the lurking plus the Singer kill was odd as hell and singer commented towards Rach earlier in the game.
Iv might be scum, but want to see NS' contributions before I give a full read.
I'm unsure in regards to you wisdom and cats.

Notscience explain why you think AA is scum? I think otherwise

I've played with AA 3 times. 1 she never even posted in her scumhydra. 1 she lurked and got shot by Nachosyry and was scum. And the last, she was decently active and town.

So.

Hi all replacing in give me sometime to get up to speed, only 17 pages so should not take too long