Page 17 of 67
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:44 am
by Sixty
Smudger (L-1)
~ The Purple Plague, Lady Lambdadelta, Does Bo Know, penguin_alien, Kazekirimaru, Plum
Garmr (L-4)
~ Debonair Danny DiPietro, walked into a club, Smudger
Debonair Danny DiPietro (L-6)
~ Garmr
Does Bo Know (L-6)
~ kanyeknowsbest,
Natirasha (L-6)
~ Natirasha
walked into a club (L-6)
~ Selkies
--With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Battery power:
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:48 am
by Does Bo Know
No.
I'm wondering why you brought up Garmr being worried about an lolhammer.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:53 am
by Plum
Because he asked me that directly? I think one of us is missing something here.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:01 pm
by Does Bo Know
In post 394, Plum wrote: In post 392, Garmr wrote:@Plum I just realized but is this the end of day 1 with a double vote. Please tell me it's just a sign you want him lynched badly and not a actual double vote. Because We have plenty of time.
You're worried about me lolhammering Smudger from L-2 with a double vote
. . .
in answer to your question, in the words of Douglas Adams: Don't Panic.
The thing I bolded is not a direct response to Garmr's direct question. The thing I italicized is.
I want to know why you said the bolded, or what the point of it was.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:09 pm
by Plum
Ah. I thought it was funny. It's perfectly in keeping with Garmr's established nervousness about Smudger getting hammered this early which hasn't struck me as off.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:10 pm
by Does Bo Know
Ah okay. So it was like a
"Man, that's classic Garmr!"
moment? That makes sense.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:23 pm
by Selkies
i woke up
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:25 pm
by Selkies
In post 192, Kazekirimaru wrote: In post 191, Selkies wrote:
I don't understand the case on bo could you talk to me about it
There's not much of a case right now. Just poke it and see what comes out.
I personally dislike how he keeps taking a conciliating tone in posts like
105 and
172.
And then there's the fact that he claims to dislike pushing scum by himself, yet he's currently the solitary vote on Plum. Before that he was voting with someone else with his other two votes. The vote on Plum just looks all-around odd to me, actually. It reads to me, along with being a placating vote like I stated earlier, as a "look at me, I do stuff on my own!" exclamation. Going against the grain for the sake of it. He even stated he didn't expect anything to come of it.
I feel like scum would not be so openly contradicting but ok I see the dissonance here
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:25 pm
by Selkies
In post 198, Does Bo Know wrote:Yep. I changed my vote to appease people. You guys were suspecting me for something really stupid. So I changed my mind and went to the philosophy I usually follow instead of that other reason.
And then I got weak and decided to let out how shitty I think my scumhunting and wagon pushing really is.
The end
This flail is terrible.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:26 pm
by Selkies
Kaze is definitely town though.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:30 pm
by Selkies
In post 237, kanyeknowsbest wrote: In post 180, Selkies wrote: In post 81, Does Bo Know wrote:^^That post was in response to the vote on me.
No but when I voted you and thought about it again Kaze, I feel like you might've been right about DDD still, regardless of your comments toward Club.
*sigh* I have a feeling plenty of this game is gonna be a meta fest and will mostly consist of me misreading people for their actual playstyles.
*cheers*
this could be scum disguising faked reads, but given the fact that DBK hasn't been trying to lead anything, but rather been posting a bunch of waffly stuff, I'm leaning towards town.
can u explain the reasoning that leads you from "passive and waffly" -> "leaning town"?
Sure, hi.
DBK states that he will misread people.
Given the nature of his following posts (mostly of him discrediting his own posts), I find this trajectory believable.
I would not "passive and waffly" townish in any other scenario, but I think it meshes well with the mindset that DBK has been trying to articulate.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:30 pm
by Selkies
So for instance I would not find the misreading people statement townish if he then proceeded to hard push a wagon or something.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:34 pm
by Selkies
Done reading game, need to sync up with fery regarding gamr and smudger.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:56 pm
by Garmr
@Selkies
Garmr as in the mythological Hell Hound.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:25 pm
by Sixty
Smudger (L-1)
~ The Purple Plague, Lady Lambdadelta, Does Bo Know, penguin_alien, Kazekirimaru, Plum
Garmr (L-4)
~ Debonair Danny DiPietro, walked into a club, Smudger
Debonair Danny DiPietro (L-6)
~ Garmr
Does Bo Know (L-6)
~ kanyeknowsbest
Natirasha (L-6)
~ Natirasha
walked into a club (L-6)
~ Selkies
--With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Battery power:
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:49 pm
by Plum
Some more Penguin would be nice.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:57 pm
by Selkies
why am i stil voting cabd[/unvpte[[/uvoe]
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:59 pm
by Smudger
I don't know why people think I will self hammer. Gamr I voted you a your reads are all basically null, except for a group of 3 including myself who have figured in other peoples reads as scum. So a lot of fluff IMO to sheep others. Nicely done though.
Yes I think PA and DBK's votes on me should be looked at especially the timing and reasons given. Nati is major lurking and I question it as I continue to find this type of play strange especially when it is accepted. I have already admitted I have played this game badly. I am just a dumb seal with no PR so, other than my vote, No major loss to town. Of course my lynch is a loss and stupid of me to have taken the stand I did. If I could undo my posts I would. So you can hammer now.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:59 pm
by Selkies
UNVOTE: [/unvpte]
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:04 pm
by Selkies
UNVOTE:
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:05 pm
by The Purple Plague
In post 372, Smudger wrote:why should I, my lynch will only help town later down the line, I have played this game badly the only thing I can do know is help where I can before you lynch me. I don't even have anything other than attracting votes to bring to the table help so, I will do what I can now..
Your lynch won't help the town much if you're town. It will probably help the scum more than it will help the town.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:10 pm
by The Purple Plague
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:10 pm
by The Purple Plague
Those aren't good dots by the way.
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:47 pm
by Selkies
nacho hasn't scumread me yet
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:57 pm
by Garmr
In post 417, Smudger wrote:I don't know why people think I will self hammer. Gamr I voted you a your reads are all basically null,
except for a group of 3 including myself who have figured in other peoples reads as scum.
So a lot of fluff IMO to sheep others. Nicely done though.
Yes I think PA and DBK's votes on me should be looked at especially the timing and reasons given. Nati is major lurking and I question it as I continue to find this type of play strange especially when it is accepted. I have already admitted I have played this game badly. I am just a dumb seal with no PR so, other than my vote, No major loss to town. Of course my lynch is a loss and stupid of me to have taken the stand I did. If I could undo my posts I would. So you can hammer now.
A majority of my reads have indications of where they are leaning to with only 4 being true null which i'm unsure of. I did how ever put kayne in the null read and then shifted him to null town at the of his read but I doubt you paid enough attention to notice that. So when you say they are all null that's pretty much misinformation as only 4/13 were true null and the other were either leaning somewhere or already there. I think you didn't actually read my post fully and just picked out the words null in them with out taking them in concept.
The bolded part is also wrong because plum was a null read this another sign you did not read my post correctly. Also my reasoning for Debonair Danny DiPietro
is different from everyone else, your post implies that I copied my reason for my scum reads from other people yet you did not post. Through I will admit my reasoning for you is somewhat shared by other players but you pretty much been picked clean.
Also your using of the word fluff is wrong. Fluff is useless information that doesn't contribute to anything. I do tend to fluff post but that post isn't one of them as it shows my mind set and players can decide from it and pick it apart and make a case if they want to or delve deeper into one of my reads. I like it when people delve deeper into my post and question me it helps build reads on them.
Basically what I think is you just skimmed the posts and looked for a cheap excuse to jump on my wagon.