Mafiascum.net

I'm about to step off to work on a paper, so let me solidify my claim more:

First, Night 2 had no deaths, obviously.

Second, if there is another protective role, he will step forth and counterclaim me.

Third, as the (theoretically) last scum (or even as the second-to-last scum), I would have nothing to benefit from trading myself for a Doctor/etc.

Fourth, set-up spec-wise, with the Neighborizor and my 1-shot BP, they make for decent protection of the Cop without becoming too "follow-the-cop."

Fifth, in terms of last mafia role spec, he is probably not a Roleblocker (would have RB'd Albert, and after Albert came up with guilty on Mark, he would have probably not tried to kill Albert again Night 3) and neither a Godfather (wouldn't be concerned about a Cop, especially so much as to attempt to kill him twice when he was protected once already; he's definitely scared of being 'copped'). Could be dealing with a Tracker, since that would be a way to find PRs for himself and a 'light' way for him to subvert the pseudo-follow-the-cop strategy.

Leaves me with Clusk, Marquis, or Fitz.

Marquis' posts about the doc/JK possibilities seems too informed.

Fitz isn't posting enough and has me worried. Clusk had an awkward post when he was at L-1 I believe about how the JK should remain silent or something.

Basically I hate you all, besides my bae of course.

WHOM YOU THOUGHT WAS SCUM </3

...I- I'm sorry, babe. I was out of line. I'm just a little frustrated by the game is all...

<3

↑ Prof Fridays wrote:Y'all are foolish.

I'm a 1-shot BP bodyguard. Protected Albert Night 2. Didn't get notified that I lost my shot (Idk what standard procedure is for that), so I figured the possibility of a JK/RB was out there, but alas. I WIFOM'd last night and decided to protect bjc last night. Night 1 was Marky Mark. I kinda thought he was town at the time, but looking back on it, it makes sense. If I'm lucky, I'll be dead tomorrow.

SO I suggest you take your votes back.

That's a lot of protecting for 1-shot. And any BP role I've ever seen has the BP die if their protectee is targeted....as you are inferring wrt Albert.

your claim sucks.

...what.

Bodyguards die if they or their protected person is targeted, yes, but I am (or was) 1-shot bulletproof, so I could take a hit. I'll probably die next time around.

Yeah - I'm not convinced. And if you are telling the truth, which I find less likely than you being untruthful, you're only a 1-shot and we wouldn't lose a PR. If you're going to fakeclaim at least claim something invaluable.

They probably didn't get a kill submitted for night 2 and now Fridays is using that as justification for there being a defensive PR even though it was obvious the best time to claim that was yesterday.

I sense a scum push afoot.

If you're a town PR, why didn't you claim yesterday?

Anatole Kuragin wrote:Yeah - I'm not convinced. And if you are telling the truth, which I find less likely than you being untruthful, you're only a 1-shot and we wouldn't lose a PR. If you're going to fakeclaim at least claim something invaluable.

They probably didn't get a kill submitted for night 2 and now Fridays is using that as justification for there being a defensive PR even though it was obvious the best time to claim that was yesterday.

Are you freaking kidding me? That is the most absurd argument I've ever heard.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:If you're a town PR, why didn't you claim yesterday?

Why would I? I had no reason to.

If you think I would forget to submit my kill WHEN I AM ACTIVE AS ALL HELL ON THIS SITE, that's insulting.

Also, it just shows that your logic is severely flawed. Occam's Razor, anyone?

↑ Prof Fridays wrote:

↑ Clusk92 wrote:Sorry for the long abscence guys, which I see has put me in a spot of bother.

Obviously the no-kill and me being gone is just a coincedence, but I can see why you'd come to the conclusion that I'm scum from that.

Don't think the JK/RB should step forward though to save me, we want those PR's being hidden for as long as possible.

Marquis is scummy for not wanting to lynch me before a replacement even had a chance to defend themselves though.

Why shouldn't the JK step forward if there is one? Their roleblock could account for the no-kill and we can lynch the last scum.

PEdit: DAMMIT ALBERT

↑ Prof Fridays wrote:Not sure why I'm suspicious, but whatever. I'm guessing we don't have a RB/JK at this point, which doesn't exactly surprise me.

I am still a PR. I can defend the Cop. Why would you not want me to protect our investigative role?

Agreed. Nothing bothers me more than a case built on the assumption that scum operate with an IQ of a banana.

But you knew that. <3

Not sure how that claim isn't all that believable.


p-edit: you know me well, I love his razor.
p-p-edit: The second quoted post only makes his claim more believable IMO>

Straw man argument anyone?

So your role is that you're a bodyguard that has 1 shot BP not a BP that has a 1 shot bodyguard?

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ Prof Fridays wrote:

↑ Clusk92 wrote:Sorry for the long abscence guys, which I see has put me in a spot of bother.

Obviously the no-kill and me being gone is just a coincedence, but I can see why you'd come to the conclusion that I'm scum from that.

Don't think the JK/RB should step forward though to save me, we want those PR's being hidden for as long as possible.

Marquis is scummy for not wanting to lynch me before a replacement even had a chance to defend themselves though.

Why shouldn't the JK step forward if there is one? Their roleblock could account for the no-kill and we can lynch the last scum.

PEdit: DAMMIT ALBERT

↑ Prof Fridays wrote:Not sure why I'm suspicious, but whatever. I'm guessing we don't have a RB/JK at this point, which doesn't exactly surprise me.

I explained this already. But basically, I was not informed of losing my 1-shot BP, so the possibility that a RB/JK roleblocked scum is perfectly plausible, and with two scum dead, I could risk the gambit of lynching the roleblocked player, since chances would be pretty good they would be scum.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Straw man argument anyone?

So your role is that you're a bodyguard that has 1 shot BP not a BP that has a 1 shot bodyguard?

Who's running the straw man here?

Sorry, I was confused about what you were claiming, but after looking at your targets that should have been obvious. If there isn't another protective role claim then you're probably legit.

Why would you not want me to protect our investigative role?

This was his straw man.

That's not a straw man - that's the truth. He could block the kill entirely.