Mafiascum.net

And here is a TL:DR

Town; rb, Aristophanes, JarJar, infinity, Raskolnikov
Null; Rem, Iprobablysuck, DrippingGoofball, kraska77
Scum; Slandaar, Manuel87, LicketyQuickety

You are correct.. I am terrible at this game.

Sorry I forgot about this game

Actually I'm bored and unable to sleep so I might as well start reading this now
So I'm on page 3 now and...
Eh...regarding the "fake townslip"...I just glossed over that when I read it. All I thought of it was: rb's fooling around. But then was surprised a "fake townslip" suggestion came at all. Just to be clear @rb and infinity
Is that like a playstyle gimmick infinity is known for or sth? Pointing out townslips or whatever?

In post 54, Naomi-Tan wrote:baring my soul

Fhdjdjdjdgsjsksjdj Naomi is adorable ♡
And town

Aww thanks Kraska ~ ♥

I think rb is town

Liquety & Slandaar are scum but rb says LQ is lynchbait so mmmmm

And yeah Aristo is scum too

I like Jarjar, I'm not buying the fake townslip reaction test either LOL

I also like Manuel - I don't like NaomiTan's case on him, it feels like scum making up shit

Right now I'm considering voting either Aristo or Slandaar

I'll iso and decide

In post 403, kraska77 wrote:Actually I'm bored and unable to sleep so I might as well start reading this now
So I'm on page 3 now and...
Eh...regarding the "fake townslip"...I just glossed over that when I read it. All I thought of it was: rb's fooling around. But then was surprised a "fake townslip" suggestion came at all. Just to be clear @rb and infinity
Is that like a playstyle gimmick infinity is known for or sth? Pointing out townslips or whatever?

It relates to an ongoing game.

Can't you answer without referring to that ongoing? Is this "are you fake townslipping" a consistent playstyle gimmick or not? Because that's a weird way to interpret rb's posts on page one and this whole reaction test episode makes me scratch my head

Im guessing its an in joke between them.

In post 105, Iprobablysuck wrote:UNVOTE: rb

I feel like someone on that early Manuel wagon is scum.. Don't know who though.

I have no idea why everyone suddenly started scumreading Naomi.

In post 110, Iprobablysuck wrote:I am not ''defending'' you nor am I townreading you (you're null to me) I just don't know why everyone started scumreading you.

This is scum I think

In post 408, kraska77 wrote:Can't you answer without referring to that ongoing? Is this "are you fake townslipping" a consistent playstyle gimmick or not? Because that's a weird way to interpret rb's posts on page one and this whole reaction test episode makes me scratch my head

No, but I think you would understand within the context of that game.

It's not a consistent playstyle thing.

PEdit: yeah I agree

In post 116, Raskolnikov wrote:I think 1-2 scum are likely in the inactives at this point

This is a very weird post considering it was page five and barely anything noteworthy had happened, and lurking had yet to become a thing

In post 410, kraska77 wrote:

In post 105, Iprobablysuck wrote:UNVOTE: rb

I feel like someone on that early Manuel wagon is scum.. Don't know who though.

I have no idea why everyone suddenly started scumreading Naomi.

In post 110, Iprobablysuck wrote:I am not ''defending'' you nor am I townreading you (you're null to me) I just don't know why everyone started scumreading you.

This is scum I think

I'm unsure if this is or is not. good catch though. just seems too easy.

Well I make a practice of discerning scummy town and defending them. But this one feels like noob scum

Keep reading anyway to catch up. we have differing opinions on this though its clear the truth, its just too easy for me to accept. lets hear more keep going.

In post 125, Iprobablysuck wrote:PEdit: It's been a while since I've played Mafia so my style might be a little different.

Or you're noob scum being coached over day chat? :p
seriously though, ips' posts exude noobness but also feel strangely...directed

gtg now. I read up to page 7 and I guess my segmented catchup posts are starting to get annoying so I'll do one proper catchup post on the rest of the thread tomorrow

In post 416, kraska77 wrote:

In post 125, Iprobablysuck wrote:PEdit: It's been a while since I've played Mafia so my style might be a little different.

Or you're noob scum being coached over day chat? :p
seriously though, ips' posts exude noobness but also feel strangely...directed

gtg now. I read up to page 7 and I guess my segmented catchup posts are starting to get annoying so I'll do one proper catchup post on the rest of the thread tomorrow

I can honestly say, I have NEVER been coached as Scum.

In post 416, kraska77 wrote:

In post 125, Iprobablysuck wrote:PEdit: It's been a while since I've played Mafia so my style might be a little different.

Or you're noob scum being coached over day chat? :p
seriously though, ips' posts exude noobness but also feel strangely...directed

gtg now. I read up to page 7 and I guess my segmented catchup posts are starting to get annoying so I'll do one proper catchup post on the rest of the thread tomorrow

No I enjoyed them greatly. I just wanted you to focus on finishing your reads before we went deep into that one we differ on. as it gave me much enjoyment.

In post 384, kraska77 wrote:I know rb off-site
QT too
I'll read and post tomorrow cya

Oh cool can't wait for some more godlike meta reads from more people who think they know me.

Oh hey but you made good posts you can be town.

IPS' early posts were gross. His lurking after receiving some pressure is even grosser.

VOTE: IPS

I could join that wagon too

Support IPS, manuel, aristo, and to a lesser extent LQ wagons.

In post 420, rb wrote:Oh hey but you made good posts you can be town.

RB what you think of my theory!