Mafiascum.net

In post 397, Accountant wrote:if you're going to say "it's okay to refuse correct opinions because the person with the correct opinion has no power to enforce it", this is a ridiculous point of view.

Your idea is not correct! maybe it might be but you have no background to have an opinion on the matter! Its definitely ok to refuse whatever your saying on this matter !

In post 393, Yume wrote:

In post 386, Accountant wrote:

In post 385, Yume wrote:

In post 383, Accountant wrote:

In post 380, Frozen Angel wrote:Even I as the moderator of the game ; I have no opinion and won't express any sympathy with eaither side.

seriously why you think you have the right to talk about everything?

this is called the freedom of speech

Apparently, said freedom doesn't extend to me.

are you post restricted?

No, but the moment I say something that someone doesn't like, they scream harassment. I PMed Kuroi saying stuff he didn't like. I was not threatening him in any way or something similar. I just said something he didn't like. He called it harassment.

Did I say you were harassing me?

I didn't.

You brought that ugly accusation against me because I wouldn't just go away.

I have no desire to harass you. I'd like you to prove me wrong.

In post 400, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 397, Accountant wrote:if you're going to say "it's okay to refuse correct opinions because the person with the correct opinion has no power to enforce it", this is a ridiculous point of view.

Your idea is not correct! maybe it might be but you have no background to have an opinion on the matter! Its definitely ok to refuse whatever your saying on this matter !

Well, there's no need to have a background on something to understand it easily. The ability to perceive and judge something even though you have no prior experience with it is important for mafia players and as a general critical thinking skill.

Oh, and House, if one game doesn't make a pattern, where is your pattern of me ruining games? Afaik, you only have one game as evidence. If you have more, bring them out, otherwise your statement makes no sense.

p-edit: I said Kuroi, not House. You intentionally playing dumb or something? :/

In post 400, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 397, Accountant wrote:if you're going to say "it's okay to refuse correct opinions because the person with the correct opinion has no power to enforce it", this is a ridiculous point of view.

Your idea is not correct! maybe it might be but you have no background to have an opinion on the matter! Its definitely ok to refuse whatever your saying on this matter !

The circumstances behind the threat of rule breaking are irrelevant to the fact it was in EXTREMELY poor taste and without regard for the well-being of the community to make any such remark.

There no excusing or defending it, so please stop trying because it's not pretty.

I'm not defending anything!

I am the one who messages the listmod about the matter

I am saying someone with no idea what the hell happened has no right to judge it.

I have sirious issues with the "way you all talk" not what your saying

In post 405, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm not defending anything!

I am the one who messages the listmod about the matter

I am saying someone with no idea what the hell happened has no right to judge it.

Don't worry, I filled Accountant in.

Problem solved. Wasn't that easy?

Only one game is needed as evidence of you being a game-ruiner. However, a strong pattern of consistent non-game-ruining is needed to overturn that status. The reason for this discrepancy is due to the fact that goodwill and trust are fragile and take time to build up.

In post 407, House wrote:

In post 405, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm not defending anything!

I am the one who messages the listmod about the matter

I am saying someone with no idea what the hell happened has no right to judge it.

Don't worry, I filled Accountant in.

Problem solved. Wasn't that easy?

still neither she , nor you has any right to judge if that was a site role vilation or not. You may hate yume as much as you want! you can't enforce anything so you shouldn't talk like you can!

do that and the rest is ok

acc was a he I persume? sorry for that

In post 409, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 407, House wrote:

In post 405, Frozen Angel wrote:I'm not defending anything!

I am the one who messages the listmod about the matter

I am saying someone with no idea what the hell happened has no right to judge it.

Don't worry, I filled Accountant in.

Problem solved. Wasn't that easy?

still neither she , nor you has any right to judge if that was a site role vilation or not. You may hate yume as much as you want! you can't enforce anything so you shouldn't talk like you can!

do that and the rest is ok

Be a dear and quote me acting like I can enforce something.

Never said you ever tried that

In post 376, Accountant wrote:even an empty threat would still embody a certain disrespect for the rules

This is whats wrong!

In post 412, Frozen Angel wrote:Never said you ever tried that

You certainly implied it in your rant towards me. After all, if I'm not doing what you are complaining about, why complain at me?

it's okay. I understand what FA is trying to say now. let us simply say that we will be talking under the banner of "people giving their personal opinions". there's no way for me and house to try to enforce anything, so that issue should be solved.

I answer to any set of pronouns you wish. I'm not a picky person

In post 413, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 376, Accountant wrote:even an empty threat would still embody a certain disrespect for the rules

This is whats wrong!

It's true though.

i'm opting to blacklist anyone with more than a page worth of posts in this thread

No no no sorry. I never complained at you. you attacked me for complaining at acc so I put his and your name there (and yours was just an example as I mean its not just about him)

it applies to me as well.

FA is like that judge on The Good Wife that requires lawyers to end assertions in "in my opinion".

In post 417, Hoopla wrote:i'm opting to blacklist anyone with more than a page worth of posts in this thread

You can ban me it won't make me wrong

be more direct please

Hey, House. Here's a google form binding you. Select 'yes' and we're good to go

https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/d/1JW ... gN47r9VoWk

In post 419, House wrote:FA is like that judge on The Good Wife that requires lawyers to end assertions in "in my opinion".

I guess we're getting out of topic and I have no idea what your trying to ask me here

I'm fine with signing that form. You can consider this my signature in spirit.

In post 420, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 417, Hoopla wrote:i'm opting to blacklist anyone with more than a page worth of posts in this thread

You can ban me it won't make me wrong

be more direct please

don't try and rope me into arguing and forcing me to ban myself!