https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I think this is scum shadow_step slipping because he does have fake claims for whatever reason... as town there's no reason to think like this; becauseIn post 400, Shadow_step wrote:Also I have no idea about the flavor so I assumed like in most games with flavor there are some characters who are evil and are more likely to be scum, like team rocket in a Pokemon game. Which is why I said what I said about the mass claiming thing. If mafia have such characters who are considered to be evil then they might have fake claims, no?
Right, and in the last dance game you never "explained" your inactivity even when you were under pressure, and you eventually got lynched as town with a town partnerIn post 399, Shadow_step wrote:What I said wasn't an excuse, I didn't say my activity will be lower because xyz reason, I explained why my activity was lower than usual.
In post 212, Shadow_step wrote:This is the pathetic attempt to make something look worse than it actually is.In post 143, Aj The Epic wrote:Why? You'd advocate a PL 2 days into d1?Dunnstral wrote:Wouldn't mind lynching shadow-step at the moment
When Dunn replies to him he just avoids answering it which is even worse.
In post 147, Dunnstral wrote:Never said anything about plIn post 143, Aj The Epic wrote:Why? You'd advocate a PL 2 days into d1?Dunnstral wrote:Wouldn't mind lynching shadow-step at the moment
In post 331, Shadow_step wrote:I think AJ is just manufacturing reasons to SR Ob Alt, he's on l-2 and thinks that he needs to make a counter wagon and Ob Alt looks the best bet right now.
In post 398, Shadow_step wrote:Dunn is scum who knows AJ is town hence the defense.
Pretty quick 180 between the top two and bottom two, I don't think it's warranted by anything either.In post 399, Shadow_step wrote:This is the typical mafia move of trying to get someone who isn't being widely scum read lynched to save the scummy player for a future ML. They also get town cred this way because lol why is he defending town and is a good way to buddy up to AJ.
His whole reason to vote me is "I don't like this" and then accuses me of "nitpicking"
Why the hell do I need to talk to Pie?
What I said wasn't an excuse, I didn't say my activity will be lower because xyz reason, I explained why my activity was lower than usual.
This makes no sense whatsoever.In post 402, Dunnstral wrote:I think this is scum shadow_step slipping because he does have fake claims for whatever reason... as town there's no reason to think like this; becauseIn post 400, Shadow_step wrote:Also I have no idea about the flavor so I assumed like in most games with flavor there are some characters who are evil and are more likely to be scum, like team rocket in a Pokemon game. Which is why I said what I said about the mass claiming thing. If mafia have such characters who are considered to be evil then they might have fake claims, no?Shadow sent in his picks himself.
What he's saying here doesn't make sense from a town perspective because it assumes scum have fake claims, when he should know it's not alignment indicative (but him having one is pushing it)
Also, the way you talked to pieguy early like you wanted to work with them and then never again is what irked me.
I was never inactive in the last game, never got a prod.In post 403, Dunnstral wrote:Right, and in the last dance game you never "explained" your inactivity even when you were under pressure, and you eventually got lynched as town with a town partnerIn post 399, Shadow_step wrote:What I said wasn't an excuse, I didn't say my activity will be lower because xyz reason, I explained why my activity was lower than usual.
So what you're saying is that I shouldn't update my reads after reading the latest stuff? Okay scumfuckIn post 404, Dunnstral wrote:In post 212, Shadow_step wrote:This is the pathetic attempt to make something look worse than it actually is.In post 143, Aj The Epic wrote:Why? You'd advocate a PL 2 days into d1?Dunnstral wrote:Wouldn't mind lynching shadow-step at the moment
When Dunn replies to him he just avoids answering it which is even worse.
In post 147, Dunnstral wrote:Never said anything about plIn post 143, Aj The Epic wrote:Why? You'd advocate a PL 2 days into d1?Dunnstral wrote:Wouldn't mind lynching shadow-step at the momentIn post 331, Shadow_step wrote:I think AJ is just manufacturing reasons to SR Ob Alt, he's on l-2 and thinks that he needs to make a counter wagon and Ob Alt looks the best bet right now.In post 398, Shadow_step wrote:Dunn is scum who knows AJ is town hence the defense.Pretty quick 180 between the top two and bottom two, I don't think it's warranted by anything either.In post 399, Shadow_step wrote:This is the typical mafia move of trying to get someone who isn't being widely scum read lynched to save the scummy player for a future ML. They also get town cred this way because lol why is he defending town and is a good way to buddy up to AJ.
His whole reason to vote me is "I don't like this" and then accuses me of "nitpicking"
Why the hell do I need to talk to Pie?
What I said wasn't an excuse, I didn't say my activity will be lower because xyz reason, I explained why my activity was lower than usual.
This ^In post 384, borkjerfkin wrote:this all looks a bit "let me fit this evidence to the conclusion I already came up with"
So when are you voting OA?In post 408, Shadow_step wrote:This ^In post 384, borkjerfkin wrote:this all looks a bit "let me fit this evidence to the conclusion I already came up with"
Join me on the Dunn wagon.
meh. he's starting with a very obviously misguided mindset (OP states flavor is independent of alignment, standard U-pick shit, he obviously is assuming otherwise), which is proof of nothing other than he's not really being very analytical. If scum don't have fakeclaims, and I have no reason to see why they would (as you yourself admit too) then this isn't a scumslipIn post 402, Dunnstral wrote:I think this is scum shadow_step slipping because he does have fake claims for whatever reason... as town there's no reason to think like this; becauseIn post 400, Shadow_step wrote:Also I have no idea about the flavor so I assumed like in most games with flavor there are some characters who are evil and are more likely to be scum, like team rocket in a Pokemon game. Which is why I said what I said about the mass claiming thing. If mafia have such characters who are considered to be evil then they might have fake claims, no?Shadow sent in his picks himself.
I don't have some super amazing power that's going to keep me from being lynched; but you also shouldn't have a reason to keep saying this.In post 412, borkjerfkin wrote:I'm rereading.
I don't really want to lynch Dunn today; scrutinize him Day 2.
Who are you considering?borkjerfkin wrote:rereading AJ's body of work in ISO is giving me very cold feet on that lynch
What about the rest of his play?borkjerfkin wrote:meh. he's starting with a very obviously misguided mindset (OP states flavor is independent of alignment, standard U-pick shit, he obviously is assuming otherwise), which is proof of nothing other than he's not really being very analytical. If scum don't have fakeclaims, and I have no reason to see why they would (as you yourself admit too) then this isn't a scumslipIn post 402, Dunnstral wrote:I think this is scum shadow_step slipping because he does have fake claims for whatever reason... as town there's no reason to think like this; becauseIn post 400, Shadow_step wrote:Also I have no idea about the flavor so I assumed like in most games with flavor there are some characters who are evil and are more likely to be scum, like team rocket in a Pokemon game. Which is why I said what I said about the mass claiming thing. If mafia have such characters who are considered to be evil then they might have fake claims, no?Shadow sent in his picks himself.
OA, SS, still not entirely certain on syrIn post 415, Dunnstral wrote:Who are you considering?
was responding to SS telling me to vote youIn post 415, Dunnstral wrote:I don't have some super amazing power that's going to keep me from being lynched; but you also shouldn't have a reason to keep saying this.
I claimed because people found me not voting suspicious when it really shouldn't have been
I don't mind his syr push or AJ pushesIn post 415, Dunnstral wrote:What about the rest of his play?
I'm uneasy about themIn post 419, borkjerfkin wrote:Also I would bet the farm on Seiko being town at this point if that's relevant to you
It's simpler than that, he voted me because I voted himIn post 418, borkjerfkin wrote:I don't mind his syr push or AJ pushesIn post 415, Dunnstral wrote:What about the rest of his play?
It's possible he saw a tactical opening to push you in my 348
still feeling that out
What about the way he said aj was town out of nowhere?In post 418, borkjerfkin wrote:I don't mind his syr push or AJ pushes