Simple. I’m arrogant.In post 394, northsidegal wrote:i mean, that's the million dollar question now isn't it? did scum shoot nero or did nero save someone else?In post 392, Flavor Leaf wrote:Good work saving me, Nero.
what makes you think nero protected you? even more, what makes you think scum took a shot at you? from his iso it doesn't seem like he crumbed in any way who he was going to protect.
Thanks, Dunk. You a babe.
i mean... havent seen any reasons from you yet
Quoting for emphasis. Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.In post 407, northsidegal wrote:would any of you mind sharing a reason? i'm trying to be more active here and it'd get discussion going.
Says the person who vanity voted all of day 1 lolIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:VOTE: asp
I should have previewed that first. Alas.
Quoting for emphasis. Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.In post 407, northsidegal wrote:would any of you mind sharing a reason? i'm trying to be more active here and it'd get discussion going.
it's a waste of time explaining vote reasons to scumIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.
if you want to get scum lynched you'll need to convince other people to vote them, too. typically i've found that explaining your reasoning is more effective in getting people to believe you than just repeating your opinion. also, nobody is always right on their first guess - talking through your reads is a great way to make sure that they make sense and stand up to scrutiny.In post 413, Lapsa wrote:it's a waste of time explaining vote reasons to scumIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.
it's very important to convince other people to vote too. otherwise typically nobody will be voted. or somebody. most effective is getting people to believe you and repeat your right opinion. unless we convince people to vote scum will be lynched so it is very important suggestion to explain people their votes. voting through your reads stand up for talking through making sense. NB: read this! it's a very suggestion importantIn post 416, northsidegal wrote:if you want to get scum lynched you'll need to convince other people to vote them, too. typically i've found that explaining your reasoning is more effective in getting people to believe you than just repeating your opinion. also, nobody is always right on their first guess - talking through your reads is a great way to make sure that they make sense and stand up to scrutiny.In post 413, Lapsa wrote:it's a waste of time explaining vote reasons to scumIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.
anyways, just a suggestion.
I am utterly perplexed by this exchange.In post 418, Lapsa wrote:it's very important to convince other people to vote too. otherwise typically nobody will be voted. or somebody. most effective is getting people to believe you and repeat your right opinion. unless we convince people to vote scum will be lynched so it is very important suggestion to explain people their votes. voting through your reads stand up for talking through making sense. NB: read this! it's a very suggestion importantIn post 416, northsidegal wrote:if you want to get scum lynched you'll need to convince other people to vote them, too. typically i've found that explaining your reasoning is more effective in getting people to believe you than just repeating your opinion. also, nobody is always right on their first guess - talking through your reads is a great way to make sure that they make sense and stand up to scrutiny.In post 413, Lapsa wrote:it's a waste of time explaining vote reasons to scumIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.
anyways, just a suggestion.
i presume that i'm being made fun of. i was really just trying to find a polite way to say that the naked votes aren't worth much if nobody plans to ever explain them or if you don't follow up on them in some meaningful way.In post 419, Sunlit Diamond wrote:I am utterly perplexed by this exchange.
yeah, i realize that and i think that's entirely valid. i don't want to get into a lot of theory talk but without even the pretense of a reason i'd default to not voting someone over voting them. i'm not even questioning your vote on him, i'm just asking you to explain something behind your vote. i presume you have reasons for who you're voting so i'm interested in hearing what they are.In post 422, Lapsa wrote:@northsidegal what you might not realize is that you essentially defended Shinobi in a risk free way
mozamis gave a readPlayerX wrote: Hmm... Why should I vote Shinobi? Oh, I member - he's the dude being naked voted. Ain't worth bothering.
