do you dislike it, cakez? is your group full of townies?
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:22 am
by SirCakez
zMuffin is the only one I'm townreading so IDK. Dram and RMOJ could go either way for me.
Moreso I found it intriguing b/c you spent the last 16 pages insisting 2 dies.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:28 am
by Wisdom
have you heard about read progression? or did you even read my reads?
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:29 am
by Wisdom
or are you just trying to shade me now that 3 is in danger?
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:38 am
by SirCakez
In post 402, Wisdom wrote:have you heard about read progression? or did you even read my reads?
I did read your reads but I didn't see your "might vote 3" below the readwall. You seemed really convicted earlier but rereading the previous page it makes more sense.
Wisdom wrote:or are you just trying to shade me now that 3 is in danger?
I don't mind 3 dying. Tbh I don't mind any of the groups dying now that I think about it.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:39 am
by Eddie Cane
fitz group 3 is not conf xcum for role related reasons idk what's hard about that for you to grasp lol
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:40 am
by Eddie Cane
In post 384, Wisdom wrote:nope.
He's tunneling group 3 with zero consideration of his own group having scum
The only times he's mentioned them was to hand both nsg and dv weakly reasoned townreads and call fitz meh
I think my group could have xcum. yours probably does. in our last game I did not reason any read for a long time and I basically active lurked for 30 pages and you didnt say shit. now you're shading me over it.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:41 am
by Eddie Cane
In post 388, BuJaber wrote:Eddie 3 questions:
Do you think it's possible group 2 has 0 scum?
Do you think it's possible group 1 has 0 scum?
If yes to both do you think it's possible they could have 0 scum at the same time, ie 3 scum in group 3?
In post 384, Wisdom wrote:nope.
He's tunneling group 3 with zero consideration of his own group having scum
The only times he's mentioned them was to hand both nsg and dv weakly reasoned townreads and call fitz meh
I think you're scum, because this is not how you treated me previously when I was useless. Thoughts?
i nowhere called you useless in that quote, cool misrepping
but I called me useless
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:41 am
by Eddie Cane
In post 393, BuJaber wrote:The only thing that was stopping me from voting group 3 was that I thought RMOJ and dramon are too scummy to be scum and my strongish townread of cake. I read cakes ISO and I couldn't see what made him a strongish townread for me . So if I take out these two factors group 3 becomes a pretty attractive lynch.
I'm also not convinced eddie is town but we do agree on one thing - group 3 has to contain 1 scum at least. No way all 4 of them are town.
But I'm paranoid thinking about the wagon progression:
why was group 2 not hammered? I'm pretty sure we got to L-2. Maybe L-1 if I missed a vote.. isn't it weird considering we only needed 4 votes from outside the group for a lynch? Even if there's 1 scum in group 1 not 0 scum benefit a lot from lynching the big group. If scum aren't in 2 why didn't they?
when was this?idts
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:43 am
by Wisdom
I did briefly scumread you in our last game but the other reads were stronger and then you townposted again and I changed my mind
Here it's not that you haven't reasoned reads that pings me, it's that I am looking for people who have an agenda of not lynching their group and you're fitting it
In post 410, Wisdom wrote:I did briefly scumread you in our last game but the other reads were stronger and then you townposted again and I changed my mind
Here it's not that you haven't reasoned reads that pings me, it's that I am looking for people who have an agenda of not lynching their group and you're fitting it
I do have an agenda of not lynching my group. 25%of it is conf town. if I had scumreads in it sure I'd consider it but as a townie and a possible pr I'm not really interested in self voting qhen mu 3 groupies are 3 of the townier slots. I say townier hesitantly because most people are pretty null.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:47 am
by Wisdom
which is not a town mindset
whether you survive shouldnt be relevant if you kill scum with selflynching
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:48 am
by Eddie Cane
yes it is. thank you for demonstrating how . cant even finish a sarcastic insult because i like you sorry you're xcum
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:49 am
by dramonic
In post 410, Wisdom wrote:I am looking for people who have an agenda of not lynching their group and you're fitting it
You're supposed to be looking for scum.
Thought you'd like to know.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:49 am
by Wisdom
which im doing and ive found them
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:50 am
by Eddie Cane
you'll see why you're objectively wrong eventually. focus on other things if you're town now, specifically why I should be scumreading anyone in my group.
pedit; lol
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:51 am
by Wisdom
if you need me to tell me why you should be scumreading them it means you default to townreading them and dont even care if they are scum
again, not a town mindset
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:54 am
by implosion
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:56 am
by Eddie Cane
In post 418, Wisdom wrote:if you need me to tell me why you should be scumreading them it means you default to townreading them and dont even care if they are scum
again, not a town mindset
no, it means I've already stated I town lean them and you're giving me no reason to disagree. I'm really tempted to vote group 2 solely for your lynch tbqh.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2018 8:56 am
by Eddie Cane
also lol at all of group 3 being the group 1 votes except jungle
