Mafiascum.net

In post 208, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: TIC

just read the game this is transparently scum

In post 211, ThoseInCharge wrote:Ok so here's where we stand right now

VOTE: Fuwa Fuwa Time

In post 191, Fuwa Fuwa Time wrote:

In post 189, shortaru wrote:

In post 188, Fuwa Fuwa Time wrote:

In post 143, Carcalilly wrote:Man, did the joke really fly that far over your head...?

I wasn't completely caught up and thought he was serious when I asked the question.

How can a vanilla townie cc on the first few pages be serious?

I thought it could have been a Newbie mistake.

In post 192, Fuwa Fuwa Time wrote:Mistake as in a newer player thinking that Vanilla was something they needed to CC.

This argument here makes no sense. I don't see anyone thinking that newbies would counterclaim vanilla, so claiming to think it was a newbie mistake is ridiculous. I also think that it is scummy, because I usually see this kind of out-of-the-world logic come from scum than town.

Earlier on I said I was evaluating FFT's posts on Page 5. That was because I felt that they were posturing to scumpaint shortaru given how much flak he already got. However I did a double take there because it could also be a town push. FFT ended up concluding shortaru town but given how their questions I see it as scummy.

-BNL

p.s. This slot has 2 heads, it's not just Ari

In post 243, BBmolla wrote:k

VOTE: Gamma

In post 247, shortaru wrote:VOTE: ThoseInCharge

A few votes might motivate them to town up if they are.

If I see an opening for a Thor wagon, I'm abandoning ship.

In post 275, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: carca
you guys can fight me this is scum

In post 289, Performer wrote:

Votecount 1.03

shortaru (3): Akarin, Carcalilly, Gamma Emerald
Carcalilly: SirCakez
SirCakez: Wisdom
Fuwa Fuwa Time (2): Flubbernugget, ThoseInCharge
Gamma Emerald (2): Thor665, BBmolla
Thor665 : Fuwa Fuwa Time
RadiantCowbells:
ThoseInCharge (2): RadiantCowbells, shortaru
Flubbernugget:
Creature:
BBmolla:
Wisdom:
Akarin:


Not voting : Creature
No lynch: no one
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Day 1 ends on (expired on 2018-11-07 16:12:53)


Moderator notes: if you have to replace out for any reason,

please

make it clear in a pm to me. Thank you!

In post 299, Akarin wrote:That said, this is the scummiest thing about how the Shortaru wagon dissolved:

In post 64, Creature wrote:

In post 57, shortaru wrote:

In post 54, Creature wrote:

In post 3, shortaru wrote:First!

VOTE: Fuwa Fuwa Time

First vote in the first post goes to the first player listed.

Too scummy post

Where's your vote?

When I finish catching up

In post 77, Creature wrote:

In post 63, shortaru wrote:Oh noes!

Not liking these

In post 174, Creature wrote:

In post 83, ThoseInCharge wrote:Creature, why no vote?

idk who to vote, man

If Shortaru is town, Creature is pushing the wagon without actually committing to it and jumping on in one of the more suspicious wagon positions.
If Shortaru is scum, Creature is set up to bus him if it looks inevitable.
Either way, VOTE: Creature

In post 308, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 281, Thor665 wrote:

In post 278, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well I’m not anticipating you doing research, because why would you? And what research have you done anyway?

I lost interest in discussing stuff with you about the time you claimed I would have no recent meta on you after agreeing my meta conclusion was right and being aware we do have recent interactions that could easily lead to me having more recent meta awareness of you. Also, when you said that Shortaru's case on me had merit.
You're not dealing with this conversation honestly.

I don’t think you’re approaching this honestly if the second you’re forced to provide specific backing for your read you clam up.
VOTE: Thor

In post 310, Fuwa Fuwa Time wrote:VOTE: Gamma

In post 319, shortaru wrote:That said,

VOTE: Gamma

I'm just disappointed in how this conclusion was reached.

Method matters.

In post 402, Thor665 wrote:If you're aware of it, why are you asking me what issue I'm referencing? You went dead silent while I've been getting louder.
Not that I'm aware of.

In post 399, Thor665 wrote:With an awareness that the bolded is, functionally, a lie in his dismissal of my ability to read him

In post 399, Thor665 wrote:He's also admitting I'm right about his current meta presuming I know his current meta - which I do.

In post 404, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 402, Thor665 wrote:If you're aware of it, why are you asking me what issue I'm referencing? You went dead silent while I've been getting louder.
Not that I'm aware of.

Dead silent HOW?
And in that case, which games of mine have you read that are recent (recent in this case means I started that game in May of this year onward)?

In post 406, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 399, Thor665 wrote:With an awareness that the bolded is, functionally, a lie in his dismissal of my ability to read him

Cite this pls

In post 407, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 399, Thor665 wrote:He's also admitting I'm right about his current meta presuming I know his current meta - which I do.

Same here

In post 408, Flubbernugget wrote:And if the answer is "I'm cornering you into breaking the rules" the REAL answer is "I have no reason to trust your read"

In post 273, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t trust you using outdated yet incorrect meta to form a scumread on me, even if it is correct meta nowadays.

In post 409, Thor665 wrote:

In post 404, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 402, Thor665 wrote:If you're aware of it, why are you asking me what issue I'm referencing? You went dead silent while I've been getting louder.
Not that I'm aware of.

Dead silent HOW?
And in that case, which games of mine have you read that are recent (recent in this case means I started that game in May of this year onward)?

Still can't reaally talk about my methodology, but basically i went and clicked on your threads and skimmed through a handful at the top for compare/contrast purposes.

I'm willing to go back and skim them again to try to recall specific games - but will only do so if you absolutely assure me this will;
1. Provide a game relevant interaction from you.
2. That you will explain how me bringing up meta you know is accurate and pointing out I'd checked recent games equates to you voting me. Because I'd love to hear that scumclaim explained.

Deal?
Because busywork is busy and empty as a question as far as I can see.

In post 416, Flubbernugget wrote:Gamma,

Do you believe thor's current meta on you is correct?