Mafiascum.net

In post 392, ofrhz wrote:

In post 167, mbaki wrote: Right now I am working from Xtoxm, Lolwagons, and Dannflor as townies. I have waffled mentally a lot between Podoboq and Mewtaph, I do not believe it is theater though so if one is scum and flips there's that at least. bristep123 and Doughboy have not posted that I remember since I became involved in the game.

mbaki

, why the townread on Xtoxm?

In post 381, Trekkie99 wrote:I think he's town

In post 398, Trekkie99 wrote:Gamma Emerald is most likely to flip scum.

In post 402, mbaki wrote:VOTE: Ofhrz

Is it odd the two subs are the two most suss slots right now?

In post 406, mbaki wrote:I don't need an extension personally, but I will approve for others who do.

In post 371, Dannflor wrote:

In post 365, Trekkie99 wrote:Town: dannflor, mewtaph, podoboq, lolwagons

Mixed: gamma emerald, mbaki

Null: ofrhz, sheepsaysmeep

I ask again, why aren't you voting? You should at least be pressuring one of your mixed reads to get a better feel for them. Right now, you're doing... Nothing.

In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn’t see any broken tags though...

Literally just look at the post and then how he fixed it two posts later. He was trying to quote me and failed. Do you have anything useful to offer the game? I mean I townread you earlier but your ISO has improved 0%.

In post 377, sheepsaysmeep wrote:

In post 374, sheepsaysmeep wrote:this feels like a sort by postcount game where the game is being controlled by village currently

podoboq(70)

dannflor(50)
mbaki(50)

lolwagons(44)

mew(39)

trekkie/doughboy(31)

gamma(28)

sheep/xtoxm(27)

ofrhz/bri(11)

In post 379, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why do the three reds look the same



mew is stronger wolf than the other two

In post 393, ofrhz wrote:

Mew,

what is your read on gamma?

In post 405, Thespio wrote:

vc up in a bit, if you all would like to just dye to the holiday, we can extend the game 2 days to compensate for Christmas and Christmas Eve. Just need a majority approval.

In post 414, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 377, sheepsaysmeep wrote:

In post 374, sheepsaysmeep wrote:this feels like a sort by postcount game where the game is being controlled by village currently

podoboq(70)

dannflor(50)
mbaki(50)

lolwagons(44)

mew(39)

trekkie/doughboy(31)

gamma(28)

sheep/xtoxm(27)

ofrhz/bri(11)

Yeah that’s really not “sorting by postcount”
By your logic podoboq should be lock villa

In post 405, Thespio wrote:

vc up in a bit, if you all would like to just dye to the holiday, we can extend the game 2 days to compensate for Christmas and Christmas Eve. Just need a majority approval.

In post 239, LolWagons wrote:I think Trekkie is probably town for going after someone most people thought was town but Podo hopping off his read of me quickly is a bit disconcerting.

In post 258, mbaki wrote:

In post 214, podoboq wrote:I can't tell if mbaki's push on GE is scummy or not, but it's garbage either way. The fact that he came to the same conclusion, "I don't believe Gamma Emerald read the game and came to the conclusion his current nitpick is how he's going to find scum," but his next step was "therefore he's scum," doesn't make sense to me when that reads as extremely towny to me. Either mbaki is mistaking bad play for scummy play, or mbaki is just trying to justify his scumread without any real supporting evidence.

Except I'm

not voting Gamma Emerald

?

In post 352, LolWagons wrote:

I don’t really like how Mewtaph comes in and just asks Trekkie to explain after Dann is clearly already pressuring him.

Still have too many townreads but whatever. I’m fairly confident I was right the first time.

VOTE: Mewtaph

Still don’t know if Trekkie pushes me as scum but he isn’t responding well to Dans pressure.

Podo/Dann/Sheep still town. Be interesting to see if Bri’s replacement towns it up.

In post 361, Mewtaph wrote:I don't really like doing lists in general, but here's where I'm at currently...

-- Town --
{Dannflor, LolWagons, mbaki}
{Gamma, Trekkie}
{podopoq, ofrhz, Sheepsaysmeep}
-- Mafia --

In post 397, mbaki wrote:

In post 391, ofrhz wrote:

In post 166, mbaki wrote:

In post 164, podoboq wrote:Would scum openly misrep something so easy to just go back and check? Like, there's no way scum Gamma is intentionally misrepping this, knowing it takes 10 seconds to find out that it's not accurate. Using this as justification that Gamme is scum rather than he just mixed things up seems like a leap.

So do you think Gamma Emerald is posting good, townie thoughts?

Hmm, I don’t think pod said gamma was posting good, townie thoughts anywhere?

I am not Dannflor and my gripe with Gamma Emerald is that his full iso is nothing, calling someone else out who's doing nothing, even though that someone did something, finding a weird way to push them on something outright false, said thing gets proven false, and Gamma doubles down and says that's even scummier!

This is not a townie thought process.

And now, one person has explicitly agreed with me and another has called Gamma Emerald's posting scumposting, but Gamma's vote remains despite it being disapproved by multiple people.

This is after Gamma chose only to comment on the not relevant thing in the first place. He still has not answered why he questioned myself over Xtoxm either even though

Xtoxm is the one who started the "scummy" tangent

.

The bolded is a fallacy and kind of appeals to the majority, e.g. “Other people think this as well, so why don’t you?”

your quoted example is a valid question. going against the status quo requires expansion.