Mafiascum.net

In post 361, BlurryX wrote:Antitown for sure. Antitown != scum though. Also, no intention for me to hammer as of yet. We will see how it looks in 24 hours.

how do things look now?

@yellow
do you have other scumreads that are not based on activity?

Yep l8.

So basically you're saying I don't add greater than 10 percent value to our win chances. Understood. No offense taken.

In post 392, YellowSnow wrote:In this case I disagree on a lynch being better than a no lynch. I think we are narrowing down who the scum are and can afford one no lynch and I can be a valuable player.

I'm definitely with Brass on questioning this one, as a semi-experienced player you would know how that works better than most of us, excluding Brass. A mislynch confirms a townie, it reduces the number of claims and can make it easier to locate scum merely by decreasing number of unconfirmed.

At this point I'm starting to believe that you would be a safe lynch in any case, even without a good read, because as you stated in your post #393 "I think you know from our newbie game that I am not a town liability in normal circumstances." and followed up stating that you haven't been able to be active due to IRL, meaning this isn't normal circumstances. Even if they were to lynch me, if your current playstyle continues it would be hard not to (mis)lynch you anyways due to the scum-reads people are already seeing from you.

You've been posting more frequently the last couple of days, but nothing substantial has come from you other than calling to lynch me instead or claiming that you can be valuable to town.

That's because I don't believe anyone is actually going to change their minds. Once I flip town my reads hopefully will be the basis for the next lynch.

@yellow
my vote is still on saint right now, but unfortunately we dont have much time left, should have pushed harder before..
i think i believe you, and i think brass also might believe you, but time's not on our side..so you're our best option right now, since we know at the very least, we're not lynching a PR..would have been better if we could lynch mafia, but such is life..

also, can you summarize why l8 is scummy for you please?

lastly, im still pushing for saint's lynch..i dont like his post 404..
basically just reusing brass and mine's argument unto yellow..feels very icky to me..

@saint: what do your reads look like now?

He's scummy because he's not scumhunting he's just trying to fit in.

how do you differentiate scumhunting and blending in?

Beecause of his position on his wagons and his focusing on low hanging fruit.

With the amount of time we have left, I feel like its time. A Saint wagon is going to develop at this point, and I don't want to miss the deadline.

VOTE: YellowSnow

im surprised with the hearth NK..i would think it was a lucky shot..
anyway, sorry yellow, time constraints..should have made votes earlier..
im still fine with this:

VOTE: saint

I'd also like to hear from Saint.

VOTE: Saint

Saint, your ISO looks awfully lurky. Is there a good reason for that?

In post 417, xwing wrote:im surprised with the hearth NK..i would think it was a lucky shot..

A bit odd that both the SE's and the IC made it through the night. I had expected scum to take out one of the more seasoned players.

I checked Hearth's ISO but didn't see any obvious breadcrumbs that scum might have picked up on. I might have missed it in one of his walls though.

I'm going to have to go back and read Hearth's ISO tomorrow because that was a bit surprising of a lynch.

I'm curious if Blurry has any thoughts on the end of Day 1 or where we are now since he didn't cast a vote and didn't post that last day

So, my NKA says, killing on the wagon means that scum was likely off the wagon yesterday... Unless somehow Hearthstone let slip that he was Dr. I don't see any crumbing in his ISO now that I look for it, but my rule of thumb right now is that I should likely reevaluate my reads unless someone finds something.

If anyone sees anything that hints at hearth being Doctor in his ISO let me know.

In post 421, brassherald wrote:So, my NKA says, killing on the wagon means that scum was likely off the wagon yesterday... Unless somehow Hearthstone let slip that he was Dr. I don't see any crumbing in his ISO now that I look for it, but my rule of thumb right now is that I should likely reevaluate my reads unless someone finds something.

If anyone sees anything that hints at hearth being Doctor in his ISO let me know.

I'm going to re-read through Hearth's ISO again as well, as I want to know if his nightkill was to generate WIFOM or if it was because scum deduced that he was the doctor (or at least a town power role in general).

Well from my read-thru i didn't find any indication that hearth was the doctor.

Where it stands now, I still want to hear from Saint. Hopefully he shows soon

quack