Mafiascum.net

In post 397, skitter30 wrote:march i kinda think that you lot might be scum

Lets talk about it tomorrow

-march

In post 398, Irrelephant11 wrote:Feeling sick. Glad my “hot take” got a conversation moving
Kinda don’t townread the two votes that followed my read, but I also doubt they’re ever s/s
Hopefully I’ll be healthy and clear headed tomorrow

Skitter I’ve only mindmelded with you like 1.5 times this game. Are you scum

nope

hope you feel better!

idk is there anything i said/did that you want to talk about? do u usually mindmeld with town!me? i don't remember.

tomorrow irl or tomorrow like the next phase of the game?

Irl tmr

Im going to bed.

Do speak with the other four though if they show up!

I meant tomorrow irl
Idk about Smile’s meaning of the word
Yes I want to talk to you about things but not right now I’m gonna sleep now

sounds good

In post 335, skitter30 wrote:

In post 255, tris wrote:I think it's comparable to how I was with my vote on ofrzh in RVS. I don't really see what you're talking about.

fair enough; i didn't remember your rvs vote there
i also don't know if scum!you argues with me for giving you a townread so

heh

------------------------

335 and some of skitter's recent interactions are leading me to townread skitter now. Seems natural.

... i actually have no memory of writing that.
(i'm kinda expunging the particulars of that game from my memory)

to clarify, is the bit you highlighted part of what you liked about 335?

VOTE: MKM I don't like 321

i'll also be here tomorrow. sorry guys.

In post 379, skitter30 wrote: i'm still mulling over whether or not it's scummy; i'm not sure that scum says this post in conjunction with the next one tho (the one pointing out that scum could defend lhf just as easily as vote them) - if you're scum trying to stave off the wagon you'd kinda want to incentivize people defending you, i'd imagine, not point out that it's a good place for scum to sit

I think this is correct. I'm still townreading Fuscezu.

oh, and given another game just ended, i'm more comfortable saying i townread Fuscezu, and i agree with skitter's take that you quoted there.

I'll also do stuff tomorrow. Sorry y'all

In post 364, Fuscezu wrote:LHF wagons are really bad for vca

In post 365, Fuscezu wrote:Scums literally as likely to defend LHF with minimal content as attack it.

Maybe you should actually vote then, and start a good wagon.

nah. im still reading

Im sorely tempted to vote irre the more of him i read.

In post 153, skitter30 wrote:not sure scum!tris says this really?

I noticed it last night and its been an allgame thing it seems.

Why do you townhunt using anti-scum tells? idgi it seems kind of wifomy.

In post 171, Miss Kobayashi Maru wrote:today i townishly slept through all my alarms

I feel like they may have townishly rolled scum, but thats not really a strong or science-backed read.

In post 205, Persivul wrote:That's either an uncannily keen observation...or you read ahead and are only pretending to be doing a post by post catch-up.

Im back and forth on this in general; ie as scum i often feign ignorance or read ahead and 'anticipate' concerns people raise later on when i catchup. But as town/scum i also tend to read the most current pages first just to make sure i didnt miss any big new developments. I think its a kind of weak point to raise whatever the case though, and wonder why you felt the need to bring it up. But thats not something I can pin down as scum or not yet. Soon though

In post 214, insomnia wrote:It feels rather shallow to vote based on such a weak push. Did you even read my other posts or you saw something that you could've easily jumped on?

You put words in my mouth in the beginning and now are pushing me based on not paying attention.

VOTE: Persivul

Yes, im more in agreement here than not.

In post 214, insomnia wrote:Bring it dude, you picked the wrong tunnel

No, its not a tunnel.

In post 231, ClearlyClarity wrote:- Third-party factions indicate roles like SK or Survivor iirc? I haven't ever played in any games with those roles, what's the meta?

Anti-town roles win try to further their wincon.

sk will want to kill scum on day and kill town at night.
they will tend to be standoffish and may or may not claim anything.
they tend to be ascetic and cant be copped or tracked
they may have an additional power

Survivor is basically town, but they care less about scumhunting.

Please dont complicate the game rn and try to imagine all manner of wild and crazy roles. We know there's a group of bad guys, and there are good guys...

we should not assume the presence of an sk until we have too many bodies.

we should not assume survivors until somebody starts acting weird and appeasy. Survivors are not anti-town in that they can achieve their wincons whilst we achieve ours. They just arent reliable sucmhunters.

Also, as of 231 clarity has done fuckall for content

In post 254, Chara wrote:i was going to put some effort in here, but then skitter did town things and i decided i could rest instead.

also, as someone who holds onto its vote far too much, i don't find insomnia's not immediately voting to be a bad thing, really.

In post 273, Irrelephant11 wrote:why did the game stall? scum apparently feel comfy

Let's go.... here VOTE: chara

good vote