Mafiascum.net

Menalque, Oversoul, Delta, serene, the Potter guy all town. I guess gandalf but that's more of a townreads townread consensus. Carl can be Fringe town.

The rest of you are getting mowed down.

HA!

In post 398, Oversoul wrote:

In post 397, Menalque wrote:

In post 396, Oversoul wrote:I’m gonna be really sad when I joined this game to shoot a gun and then I don’t get the chance to shoot a gun

Why would you not get the chance to shoot a gun?

If Most Absurdly Beautiful gets their way i will be stranded and thus unable to fire

Dw we’re not stranding u

In post 401, Tet wrote:HA!

You have freed me from the burden of the pagetop streak and for that I thank you

Hmm Tet might be scum after all

In post 404, Oversoul wrote:Hmm Tet might be scum after all

You think that readslist was a pocket or..?

It would be a shame if I had to shoot you too soul.

In post 406, Tet wrote:It would be a shame if I had to shoot you too soul.

You have control over more than one shot?

Serene definitely seems a bit scummish from their argument with Carl. I do not think it to be implausible that Serene and Carl are scum-on-scum, but there's not much to support that on Carl's side so T-T is more likely. Scum!Carl probably wouldn't be looking for this fight.

Also have Gandalf and Egduf as scumreads, though they may be newb!town and slightly-less-newb!town respectively. Oversoul was initially a light scumread but looks more like town as the day has gone on. Menalque is town, Espresso is townish. Tet is hard to read at this point, that last post isn't doing any favors.

I can middle of the pack it. Scummy enough scum leave me be. All the townies aren't shooting. I'd guess I get two shots this game yeah.

In post 405, Menalque wrote:

In post 404, Oversoul wrote:Hmm Tet might be scum after all

You think that readslist was a pocket or..?

I don’t think it was a pocket (mafia theory wise: I don’t think Pocketing is actually a valid tactic). I think the reads’ list was an easy one to make. There were no controversial reads in that list.

Menalque's - good contributions and obsession with is good.

Carl's - self explanatory

I can see Serene being scum - but only with me, town otherwise, so only a slight scumlean

Tet hasn't explained any reads yet, and most of their posts are setup-related or . Also, that last post of theirs is just a bit slightly kind of LAMIST.

VOTE: VOTE: Vote: Tet

Persivul:

All good if I use the vote tags?

PageMiddle

In post 411, Hectic wrote:I can see Serene being scum -

but only with me

, town otherwise, so only a slight scumlean

Huh?

In post 413, Oversoul wrote:

In post 411, Hectic wrote:I can see Serene being scum -

but only with me

, town otherwise, so only a slight scumlean

Huh?

Uhhhh... bit of a scumslip there. Disregard that please.

No, but I should probably clarify that was a joke before it wastes too much discussion.

In post 410, Oversoul wrote:

In post 405, Menalque wrote:

In post 404, Oversoul wrote:Hmm Tet might be scum after all

You think that readslist was a pocket or..?

I don’t think it was a pocket (mafia theory wise: I don’t think Pocketing is actually a valid tactic). I think the reads’ list was an easy one to make. There were no controversial reads in that list.

Controversial doesn't mean town so idk what you're getting at?

Unless you find issue with me trying to appease you (Oversoul) and serene since they are probably the two most likely to take a shot tonight if town. That would also have to assume I'm not barricading tonight and have to worry about taking a bullet.

In post 411, Hectic wrote:Also, that last post of theirs is just a bit slightly kind of LAMIST.

Not a game read but these buzzwords really bug me.

Like I said, I don’t care about appeasing. But the reads you came up with seemed more like trying to mirror popular opinion than you really thinking those things

Yeah LAMIST (look at me I’m so town) is something I still don’t fully understand. Mainly because I don’t think it properly captures the specific action that people think it does. I think LAMIST is too broad.

Hectic: I will keep that potential slip in mind; I had a null read on you and this does not change that. It probably just a poorly thought out joke.

Oversoul and Tet: That post was in no way LAMIST. It's neutral at worst, making an observation about the setup.

VOTE: Iconeum just for the sake of having it on someone.

In post 418, Oversoul wrote:Like I said, I don’t care about appeasing. But the reads you came up with seemed more like trying to mirror popular opinion than you really thinking those things

Yeah LAMIST (look at me I’m so town) is something I still don’t fully understand. Mainly because I don’t think it properly captures the specific action that people think it does. I think LAMIST is too broad.

Fair you don't know why I have any of the reads I have. But no one has asked why I'm reading anyone one way or the other.

I'm not keen on wasting time on reads that maybe will maybe won't be considered.

True, people do seem to overuse words like and nowadays, and calling that post LAMIST was probably wrong on my part. Basically, I think Tet's post (although probably a joke) was more scum-indicative than town, because scum!Tet would want town to see them in a townie's mindset, looking like they're thinking about whether scum is gonna kill them, and if they can live as a townie long enough to fire off 2 shots. It's minor though and probably not even worth this .

Knock knock

In post 411, Hectic wrote:I can see Serene being scum - but only with me, town otherwise, so only a slight scumlean

I honestly feel like I got what you were trying to say until you said "only a slight scumlean." Consider me very confused.
"X could only be scum with me" is a plausible thing for town to say to townread someone else. Something like "Because of X's interactions and blablabla, the only way X could be mafia is if X were partners with me, so [because I'm town] X is town."
I don't get why Serene is leaning scum to you in the world where Serene can only be scum with you.

PageBottom