Mafiascum.net

will put in vc at not 4am

I can understand with the pop ins and not posting. Unless I see something I can directly answer I'm playing catch up. My evaluation is shifting slightly, but need a bit more time. Once my set of shifts have finished I'll have more time, but until monday 14 hours of my day is taken out by work and travelling unfortunately.

I am so close to voting Flavor..... I dont care if he is town or not. he is lurking on purpose. Atleast Jorge is atleast putting some effort in. My issue is what happens if we get to Lylo and we are stuck with a lurking Flavor. Also it makes him hard to read. The sooner the reads we have the better. Right now Flavor is just being plain anti-town

I really really hate policy lynches..... I hope Flavor will not push this. I dont want to policy lynch anyone.
Please for the shake of the game stop lurking. I am asking as nice as I can man, you are ruining the game for the rest of us

Starting to write my post now, I’m doing a full reread of the game so far.

I’m waiting for someone to take my bait.

What bait? If somebody votes you it’s completely justified. You can’t claim you’re intentionally lurking until somebody votes you and then expect us to believe you when you call them scum

In post 405, Wimpy wrote:What bait? If somebody votes you it’s completely justified. You can’t claim you’re intentionally lurking until somebody votes you and then expect us to believe you when you call them scum

You act like I’m baiting the person who votes me.

I actually haven’t been even lurking here, I’ve literally just done a few pop ins and not been keeping up. I got a lot on my plate! So i chose to do a bait. I wish you guys would wait. If i stay here, imma be late. Trust me, it’s fate.

The first non-rvs vote occurs in post 16, where Invisibility accuses theFuzzyLogic99 of being scum. He does this because Fuzzy voted himself during rvs. I think that for Invisible to vote because of that during rvs is unreasonable. can be voted in rvs, it’s just jokes which will eventually create discussion. This forces me to come to the conclusion that further discussion was exactly why Invisibility voted Fuzzy here. Scum!Invisibility should know this is an inviable option, and town!Invisibility has no reason yet to believe Fuzzy is scum.
In the next post, Fuzzy calls it scummy to want to lynch the town potato. I find this strange, as, by this point, nobody has established themselves as anything, much less a “town potato”, which (correct me if I’m wrong), means people have good reason to believe he is town, and is being needlessly voted. For Fuzzy to simultaneously vote himself and call himself a “town potato” seems contradictory.
In 42, Kanna asks Fuzzy why he called himself the town potato. Fuzzy answers about 40 posts later, saying:
“Why did you self vote.....

because it was a funny response, at least in my opinion. TBF though I am easily entertained.

Why did call yourself the town potato?.....
see above statement”
I don’t see this as an appropriate justification, but, due to it being rvs and Fuzzy not appearing to do anything scummy later, I will let it pass. For now.

It is now that I make my first dispute with Nicholai. I voted him for what I felt was biased treatment against people, and not necessarily because I thought that he was scum. If someone has no votes on them, a vote can be used not only to indicate you think they’re scum, but also just to get their attention and show you didn’t like a comment. This was my intention during this post. This will cause the other player to write a defence, which Nicholai did, as I expected. However, this post was based around meta, and, having no meta experience with Kanna, I was unable to accept it fully. However, I could partially accept it, which helped shift Nicholai from scum to null. I know I wrote in 105 that I thought it was scummy, but upon further consideration I don’t think it was.

In 96, Salemence calls Fuzzy town, I would like him to elaborate on that.

In 132, Nicholai calls Non Ihm town, but I believe this to be sarcasm.

In 151, Nicholai says Kanna has obvtowned, but I’m not seeing where she did that by that point. The only thing that comes close is 115, but that’s not enough for a guaranteed town.

Near this point, a Salamence wagon forms, reaching L-3. I disagree with this wagon, at this point Salamence hasn’t done anything scummy.

Will be continued later.

Whoever you’re baiting. You’re going to have trouble convincing people

In post 408, Wimpy wrote:Whoever you’re baiting. You’re going to have trouble convincing people

I’m quite persuasive.

In post 402, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:if we get to Lylo and we are stuck with a lurking Flavor.

Why would this ever be a thing?

If i got to lylo through lurking, town would be in luck, because I’d solve the game and put forth the reasoning as to why.

I won 10 scum games in 2019, none by lurking all the way, don’t worry.

In post 409, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 408, Wimpy wrote:Whoever you’re baiting. You’re going to have trouble convincing people

I’m quite persuasive.

I’ve heard. You’ve pretty much lost me though. Maybe some others

In post 412, Wimpy wrote:

In post 409, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 408, Wimpy wrote:Whoever you’re baiting. You’re going to have trouble convincing people

I’m quite persuasive.

I’ve heard. You’ve pretty much lost me though. Maybe some others

What is lost, can always be found. That’s why we have a lost and found.

In post 401, Gjt wrote:I can understand with the pop ins and not posting. Unless I see something I can directly answer I'm playing catch up. My evaluation is shifting slightly, but need a bit more time. Once my set of shifts have finished I'll have more time, but until monday 14 hours of my day is taken out by work and travelling unfortunately.

Ouch thats bad. Its hard enough to make time when your in shift pattern where work is taking 11 and half hours. Leaving only 2 hours to what ever you need to do that isnt essential. That still leaves you short of sleep. (takes me a while to nod off) For me this is citting it very fine

kek, afternoon
so who we be mislynching, idc

YOU

In post 407, SausasaurusRex wrote:This forces me to come to the conclusion that further discussion was exactly why Invisibility voted Fuzzy here. Scum!Invisibility should know this is an inviable option, and town!Invisibility has no reason yet to believe Fuzzy is scum.

ok

In post 391, Flavor Leaf wrote:Could, and I would eventually

you'll do more when people start suspecting you???

is this the "bait"?

We’ll see

In post 334, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:BTW
Nicholai keeps defending Wimpyy when it is absolutely not needed. I have not seen anything to make me think Wimpy is incapable of defending himself.

hey Fuzzy my favourite tiger, are you still of this opinion after the discussion following it?

In post 419, Flavor Leaf wrote:We’ll see

how do you reply so quickly? do you have notifications? tell me your secret please

upon reconsideration i think Rex is just a very earnest player and takes things at face value, so i wouldn't scumread him for suspecting Wimpo. the ways his posts are structured and the robotic tone do point towards scum caring very much about how they're perceived which would be my only doubt on him

actually i'll go meta him real quick

In post 421, Nicholai wrote:

In post 419, Flavor Leaf wrote:We’ll see

how do you reply so quickly? do you have notifications? tell me your secret please

This site’s essentially like a social media site, so i refresh often. Sometimes I’m more active on Insta than LinkedIn, though,but i still see stuff happening on LI.

This game is the LinkedIn, if that didn’t make sense.

VOTE: FlavourLeaf

I will take the bait. Bring it.