Mafiascum.net

In post 281, Chara wrote:

In post 279, Macabre wrote:Furthermore, One-eye has stolen a term from the scarf boy to make a case in defense of the Chimera! Yet, this One-eye does not combat scarf boy directly. It acts without conviction. Careful!

defense of profii? i scumread profii.

as for stealing a term, i'm not sure which you mean, but it is highly possible i read something Ame said and repeated it. it's a fun fact of language that humans (or nonhumans) will tend to parrot terminology recently used by others. it's how we learn the rules of our discourse.

A bad One-eye has no reason to think critically of the words of the scarf boy if they are aware of their nature. Additionally! This crow suggests that the One-eye has seen the opportunity to blend in with the innocents! Mimicry!

It is this usage of mimicry which demonstrates the mindfulness and the lack of a will of this One-eye to combat the real reasons against the Chimera! Reduction! Slurp!

In post 282, Chara wrote:

In post 277, Macabre wrote:This crow will not recognize the greeting of the chimera, its initial vote, or past behavior of the Chimera as valid evidence. Inadmissible!

i object. all behaviour of the chimera is valid evidence!

The Knight having past experience with a good natured Chimera is unconvincing! New record!

In post 340, Egix96 wrote:

In post 272, Macabre wrote:Other parts of the case brought against the Chimera are not valid! However!

One-eye's reduction of the events that have transpired is suspicious!

Doom!

VOTE: Chara

I'm confused, where has Chara done that?

This One-eye has taken all evidence against the Chimera and labelled it as a bad vibration, yet this is a term used by the scarf boy when they delivered valid charges against the Chimera. Kokomo!

In post 402, Macabre wrote:

In post 282, Chara wrote:

In post 277, Macabre wrote:This crow will not recognize the greeting of the chimera, its initial vote, or past behavior of the Chimera as valid evidence. Inadmissible!

i object. all behaviour of the chimera is valid evidence!

The Knight having past experience with a good natured Chimera is unconvincing! New record!

oooh, you were talking about meta. no, i don't tend to use other player's meta without a good reason either.

In post 403, Macabre wrote:This One-eye has taken all evidence against the Chimera and labelled it as a bad vibration, yet this is a term used by the scarf boy when they delivered valid charges against the Chimera. Kokomo!

because i used the word "vibes"?

English may be your second language, bird, but as its my native tongue i can say with much confidence it's a term considered fairly common.
and i still have two eyes.

This crow will not take the words of the One-eye when the One-eye has taken the words from another. The evidence is as clear as many cut outs of various newspapers and cereal boxes: a letter gifted to us all as proof of the guilt of this One-eye. Scary!

In post 215, Chara wrote:it does make me wonder about what seems to be a consensus against profii, who as far as i can see hasn't done anything acutely scummy except for "bad vibes". not sure yet if it means an intuitive feeling on the part of some townies that she's scum, or scum seeing some remarks against a player and deciding they work.

In post 401, Macabre wrote:It is this usage of mimicry which demonstrates the mindfulness and the lack of a will of this One-eye to combat the real reasons against the Chimera! Reduction! Slurp!

it's more the lack of a laptop, actually...

but i understand now. it's because i reduced the profii cases to mere "bad vibes" that i was being reductive. that may be fair. i don't have any will to combat the reasons for scumreading profii because i don't think they're bad. it was the general sentiment against the slot that i found interesting, and what made me wonder if this was merely a scum that had been caught by the combined intuitions of some townies, or a towny that had happened to incite some suspicion incidentally.
but that's off of my memory. i'll need to see if it's even valid to wonder.

In post 288, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 279, Macabre wrote:Furthermore, One-eye has stolen a term from the scarf boy to make a case in defense of the Chimera! Yet, this One-eye does not combat scarf boy directly. It acts without conviction. Careful!

Dearest crow, if I may interject, this bug-slayer is actually condoning the acts of they one-eyed one. I believe they and most others in this village have condemned the chimera for his actions.

We must look beyond simple statements and question the nature of our peers if we hope to be victorious! Marvel!

For instance, it does not matter whether the One-eye and Chimera are bed mates or not! A lazy One-eye may still harm the trial against a good Chimera! Vanity!

i'm doing my best. :<

It is the duplicity of this One-eye that is most strange and open to question. How can this One-eye say one thing yet act contrary to these statements? Harvey Dent!

I've read what I've missed and these are my thoughts on the current state of affairs.
Frost and insomnia are both town.
Luca and Profii are both scum.
I felt that Luca's jump onto frost was opportunistic and a way to distract from the profii discussion which has now dissolved.
VOTE: luca
I'll read through Luca's iso now to see if it was just the way I was reading through the thread.

It's best to ignore wimpy for now. Really don't want to read 20 pages on something so silly and it just gives scum a way to engage with something if no value.

@ev read in the context of his overall play.

@chara I meant you, I was just hesitant to use 'it'. i don't think it's likely you're scum with Aaron, particularly for the post i found telling of his alignment (288). Unlikely scumate would interject I think.

@insomnia agree that aa, al, and pr cannot all be scum together.
aa-pr or aa-al. But pr cleared from being scum with al.

I'm quite certain on aaron. I don't intend to move my vote to anyone else today. Full analysis sometime later if there's time.

In post 413, Ame wrote:@chara I meant you, I was just hesitant to use 'it'. i don't think it's likely you're scum with Aaron, particularly for the post i found telling of his alignment (288). Unlikely scumate would interject I think.

ah, i see. glad i asked then. i'll still answer as soon as i'm able.

and you can use 'they' if you don't like 'it'. :>

That’s kind of shitty. Why are you encouraging people to ignore me? Don’t agree with me that’s fine but ignore me is uncalled for.

In post 414, Chara wrote: ah, i see. glad i asked then. i'll still answer as soon as i'm able.

and you can use 'they' if you don't like 'it'. :>

Ok!

@wimpy I mean as it pertains to your Mac/lynch me shenanigans. Referring to these specifically:

In post 384, Wimpy wrote: Until he’s gone I’m not doing anything else.

I don’t give a rats ass about yours or anyone else’s town read on me.

In post 385, Wimpy wrote:You guys may as well just Lynch me cause my vote will forever stay on macabre until he speaks normal.

We're not lynching Mac for his playstyle, he isn't changing it, and you're not changing your vote. There's no point in continuing that line of discussion. Of course we shouldn't ignore anything else you have to offer!

In post 319, Looker wrote:

@Macabre / AaronFrost / profii / Alchemist21

:

• Do you find this interaction suspicious?
  
• Do you feel that either of these players is town?

Scarf boy has a warm aura. A well researched scholar. Winters respite!

The Knight has not proven himself yet, though has appeared to care much of the inconsistencies of the Colonel. Defection!

To further this thought: could this scarf boy had corrected this knight in secret, and hoped to give them a way out of their own mess? Could this knight, so worried about the inconsistencies of the Colonel, truly forget his own if he were an evil doer? It seems to this crow that this knight would worry more about his own misadventures in this case! Doubt!

In post 413, Ame wrote:aa-pr or aa-al. But pr cleared from being scum with al.

The Ghost echoed the Knight's argument against the Chimera. Is this Ghost so easily aligned with the Chimera?

In post 184, AaronFrost wrote:I kind of agree with you on profii. Last game I played with him he felt pretty obviously town. Granted I was scum in that game so I didn't exactly have to read him too much but I could never push him either. Not quite getting the same vibes from him here as he's been mostly under the radar.

I'm miles behind sorry - working long days away from home, missing out my on my usual lazy days of browsing in work

In post 413, Ame wrote:@insomnia agree that aa, al, and pr cannot all be scum together.
aa-pr or aa-al. But pr cleared from being scum with al.

I think if Aaron is scum then Profii is Town. He handled Profii’s early game statements about me the same way he handled Insomnia’s and scum Aaron would have been trying to undermine 2 Town slots’ posts in that scenario.

Why do you think Alch and profii can’t be scum together? I haven’t seen anything that proves that theory or at least makes it somewhat viable. @Ame

I think this Luca thing is blown out of proportion, Aaron was much worse with his progression on me.

Cleanse that JT town read. I actually lied because of conf bias, I don’t have anything strong to base my read on him. He was more of a PoE town read than anything because I thought I’d always hit scum in alch - profii and aaron.

Profii sobbing about how he was a point of contention and busy posting right now is giving me the chillies now that everyone focuses on Luca. He could always post about actual reads than keep on apologizing and saying he’s going somewhere.

It’s weird because he didn’t even have any votes when he said that. I think he thought he was getting a much larger amount of heat than players were actually giving him, and him freaking out when his usual play style is to ignore whatever’s going on with his slot is definitely eyebrow raising.

Neutral mentality? Being extra self-aware and self-centered reads to me as he’s trying to actively fight against a lynch that isn’t even happening, which reeks of like neutral mentality.

Claiming he’s playing devil’s advocate is basically admitting to not taking a stance on anything and just posting for the sake of posting.

Lynch Aaron, get Profii next.

I’ll re-assess Luca but I don’t think we’re hitting scum there tbh