Mafiascum.net

I was expecting more, honestly. I can distinguish between genuine and false reactions. You unconscious do not seem uncomfortable with anything I said, because you know I am correct. Of course, as the rules suggest, you should try until the end, for your partner's sake.

In post 396, 72offsuit wrote:Your vote is just bad. Your reasoning is bad. You completley ignored my responses to your questions which makes you scummy.

"Just" ? I have never seen such a controlled and superficial response as this. The two genuine reactions here would be: 1. dialogue to improve the accuracy of the PoE (because you know that your role is not scum) or 2. Show firmness in the denials, making your opposition clear. In both scenarios you have failed miserably, as you choose to adopt a neutral stance.

The fact that you did not vote automatically on me shows a lack of emotional response to the accusation. Evidently, when a liar is aware that someone else knows that he is faking, he spares himself wasting time on chemical reactions such as anger or distress, because he knows that his position is false. I don't need to pressure you, because these signs are transparent to me.

Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Anyways, we are lynching you today. L-3 (3 votes remaining to lynch)

In post 332, clidd wrote:

ceejayvinoya

, you are usually misslynched in many games (that i read). Why ?

I'm not usually proactive and outspoken as town, and I tend to be inactive.

In post 380, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 326, ceejayvinoya wrote:

In post 263, clidd wrote:Now, changing the subject: who is the second

mason

among us ?

72offsuit
Maduisha
GeneralWu
OldMapleNostalgia
ceejayvinoya (SE)
JacksonVirgo (SE)

At this point, the chance of fake claims has passed. There is no point in continuing to keep your identity hidden.

Agree with this. It would stop scum from ccing and give us a confirmed townie

A Cc gives 50*50 of lynching scum. Should be saved for tomorrow. Mafia have only 20 percent chance of night killing mason tonight. We scumhunt without a mason claim.

Excuse me. What?

In post 396, 72offsuit wrote:Your vote is just bad. Your reasoning is bad. You completley ignored my responses to your questions which makes you scummy.

Why is your vote not on clidd then

I guess I could help out

VOTE: 72offsuit

Because GW is scummier.

Ohh, I woke up to such an interesting change of pace. I wonder if GW will counter claim Mapple.

72 has been wanting to lynch him almost since the game started, too...

Both seem scummy to me for some reason, but I agree throwing someone under the bus super early on doesn't seem like a good idea for scum, so I'm inclined to believe they're not a team, for now.

So, there are 7 people left. I think JV, clidd, and me (heh) are townies.

Mapple, GW, and 72 are scummy, although I'm tempted to say that if GW is scum, 72 is probably not. Let's see if there's counter claim to make things more interesting.

As for ceejay, the fact that apparently he's usually this quiet no matter what he plays as makes it very hard to read, so they can be scum hiding in plain sight and nobody will bat an eye, very problematic.

In post 411, Maduisha wrote:Both seem scummy to me for some reason, but I agree throwing someone under the bus super early on doesn't seem like a good idea for scum, so I'm inclined to believe they're not a team, for now.

Could you possibly get a more fence sitting post?

Mad's recklessness hammer just feels more like scum trying to pretend to be too scummy to be scum.

In post 403, clidd wrote:Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Do you think scum votes for a player without too many scumreads on them, then asks for others to join wagon on said player, who has had at least one player already town read them?

In post 403, clidd wrote:Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Explain how ineffective = scummy. I'm all ears

In post 401, clidd wrote:

In post 396, 72offsuit wrote:Your vote is just bad. Your reasoning is bad. You completley ignored my responses to your questions which makes you scummy.

"Just" ? I have never seen such a controlled and superficial response as this. The two genuine reactions here would be: 1. dialogue to improve the accuracy of the PoE (because you know that your role is not scum) or 2. Show firmness in the denials, making your opposition clear. In both scenarios you have failed miserably, as you choose to adopt a neutral stance.

Why would I agree with a PoE with someone I do NOT have a TR on?

In post 403, clidd wrote:Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Ok, so if i'm lynched today, then you are happy to lynch GW tomorrow?

In post 392, clidd wrote:Im considering

you

and

GeneralWu

as a team. Checkmate.

^See above

In post 415, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 403, clidd wrote:Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Do you think scum votes for a player without too many scumreads on them, then asks for others to join wagon on said player, who has had at least one player already town read them?

What did you try to say here ?

In post 413, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 411, Maduisha wrote:Both seem scummy to me for some reason, but I agree throwing someone under the bus super early on doesn't seem like a good idea for scum, so I'm inclined to believe they're not a team, for now.

Could you possibly get a more fence sitting post?

Maybe I misunderstand what fence sitting means because I'm not a native speaker, but I don't think that's what I did there? I'm saying there that I still suspect both but I'm more inclined to believe you're a townie.

In post 416, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 403, clidd wrote:Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Explain how ineffective = scummy. I'm all ears

Attempt to materialize a death tunnel since day 1 that did not work. It is not the first time that I have seen scum doing this.

In post 417, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 401, clidd wrote:

In post 396, 72offsuit wrote:Your vote is just bad. Your reasoning is bad. You completley ignored my responses to your questions which makes you scummy.

"Just" ? I have never seen such a controlled and superficial response as this. The two genuine reactions here would be: 1. dialogue to improve the accuracy of the PoE (because you know that your role is not scum) or 2. Show firmness in the denials, making your opposition clear. In both scenarios you have failed miserably, as you choose to adopt a neutral stance.

Why would I agree with a PoE with someone I do NOT have a TR on?

It is not how it works. You did not show collaboration with our mathematical solution. If you REALLY was town, you would have concisely elucidated why your didn't want your SR on it and probably would know who the scum team is (since you would discard your slot via PoE).

In post 418, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 403, clidd wrote:Your tunnel was hasty and ineffective. Even if it is not a buss, I am convinced that you are scum given your latest interactive comments about my theory.

Ok, so if i'm lynched today, then you are happy to lynch GW tomorrow?

Yes, we are.