Mafiascum.net

In post 313, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:hi i'm ofrhz

I just posted on the wrong account

I really want you and lion to be town so we can have a town block of Cats

Please please please don't be scum I should be so sad

In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

popo feels like mafia as well.

Do you think their vote pact is something 2 scum would do together?

In post 352, LicketyQuickety wrote:LOL. IDK about how strong Norway is pushing GL as a kind of OMGUS, but this sure looks different from his Scum game.

How so?

In post 349, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 347, NorwegianboyEE wrote:GL's first post actually pinged me hard, but i held back on commenting it until i'd seen what he would be up to. Since i've clearly seen his bad intentions by now there's no point concealing it.
Making a "RVS" vote like that on a random familiar slot and then leaving without doing any solving is an archtypical scum entrance i've seen a couple times by this point. Especially on my home forum. I can't explain it well. But if GL flips scum i'm going to celebrate my ability to see right through shit like that.

Take a look at post 16 for me crumbing that i would take this stance.

Lolwtf is this post even

In post 359, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 344, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 322, Truth wrote:I like GuiltyLion's case and may follow him for a while. Let's vote the person so he feels more pressure when he comes back and then has to respond while being a little self-conscious.

I don't feel pressure from a case on me that's as bad as GuiltyLion's.

for somebody who "doesn't feel pressure" you sure felt the need to ramp up your activity and argue with every point

Hol up

Didn't you shade him for not addressing your accusations point by point when he flat out called it bs?

Are you now shading him for then going and doing that?

Say what now

Again, take a look at my Large 227 game. I basically formed an alliance with Stan1ey early on. It's not scum indicative for me to do that kinda shit. And it would be pretty damn obvious if we were both scum don't ya think? I don't mind if anyone is suspicious about me pocketing or whatever, but i often find it to be a big advantage to town if i can put more pressure behind my words by getting people on my side. And it was fully up to Popopo whether he wanted to do as i said or not.

Again, take a look at my Large 227 game. I basically formed an alliance with Stan1ey early on. It's not scum indicative for me to do that kinda shit. And it would be pretty damn obvious if we were both scum don't ya think? I don't mind if anyone is suspicious about me pocketing or whatever, but i often find it to be a big advantage to town if i can put more pressure behind my words by getting people on my side. And it was fully up to Popopo whether he wanted to do as i said or not.

^Sorry double post.

In post 404, Nauci wrote: Hol up

Didn't you shade him for not addressing your accusations point by point when he flat out called it bs?

Are you now shading him for then going and doing that?

Say what now

Can you now see how in-genuine he is being?

GuiltyLying also left without answering my question which i helpfully reminded him to do.
Scum claiming.

In post 398, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Nauci how are you reading Truth?

Truth is on my list of players I'm not really going to bother sorting on day 1 due to the claim

Quick is almost always automatically on that list

Weirdly enough

I now think that GL and NB are either both town or both scum

Unlike Osuka and Quick, I find it fully plausible that these two could put on scum theatrics worthy of The Globe

My painkillers and edibles are kicking in now so I'm going to procrastinate and do all of that meta reading tomorrow

I have only played 1 game with GL and it was a newbie he replaced into like 2 years ago so I can't even remember his alignment

I just found it odd that popopopopo immediately accepted the voting alliance without questioning, and that this in turn was accepted without questioning. It felt alignment indicative to me but I couldn't fathom in which direction without doing some heavy meta lifting

I’m neither town or scumreading Popopo right now if you’re curious.

In post 410, Nauci wrote:Unlike Osuka and Quick, I find it fully plausible that these two could put on scum theatrics worthy of The Globe

Aw that’s sweet of you to say.
It’s not SvS though.

I usually don’t put much effort into bussing. And GL definitely doesn’t himself.

Did i mention GuiltyLion's scumgame sucks compared to his towngame yet?

It's also bloody hilarious that he calls me out as "tunneling" when that's basically what he's been doing himself. Town!GL is usually much more subtle and takes a look at the whole game, he doesn't double down on a shitpush.

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11537499
Take a look at GL's ISO here. Notice how he actually plays like town?

I'll give you some action for now because of the post I called out earlier looking so, so bad

VOTE: GuiltyLion

Lynching

With 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to lynch.

GuiltyLion

(4): Cat Scratch Fever, LicketyQuickety, NorwegianboyEE, Nauci

LicketyQuickety

(3): Glitch, Looker, osuka

NorwegianboyEE

(2): GuiltyLion, Truth

Nauci

(1): popopopopopopo

popopopopopopo

(1): mavsfan41

No Lynch

(1): Candy Shop

Not Voting

(1): Rozyroz

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-07-01 18:16:10).

• It's gonna be one of those games where people only play while I'm asleep, huh?
  
• I'm currently celebrating midsummer, which means inconsistent vote counts until Sunday.
  
• Rozyroz has another (expired on 2020-06-19 09:28:39) to pick up their role PM before I start looking for a replacement.

[/area]

Glitch and Looker, remind me why you two are voting Quick?

In post 176, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 144, Looker wrote:Do you feel we have a legitimate claim 7 pages in?

I don't think there is a rule that you can't claim within 7 pages...

What do YOU think about the claim? Do you believe they are millar?

I think I'm accustomed to Saudade claiming mason every game, so I think I could care less. I was trying to offset my bias with your opinion.

In post 183, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 144, Looker wrote:...

I kinda don't like this post.

-Apathy
-laziness
-voting for no reason

Don't like anything about this post actually.

• I don't see how it's apathy when I'm asking you questions. Apathy would be ignoring you entirely.
  
• Lazy is a strong accusation to make. Lazy compared to who and using what metrics?
  
• I definitely have a reason for voting you. Is your accusation your way of asking for it?
  Voting you will help me sort you, Glitch, and osuka all at the same time.

In post 206, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Looker, why did you vote for Quick?

To sort more players than Quick

In post 221, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:lol this game is going to be a clash of egos huh

That's any game where the players are insecure. Don't let that poison you.

In post 299, Glitch wrote:Why with all this to go on would we still be in RVS?

Simple - a mason claim is self-resolving: Truth should die tonight or get lynched tomorrow. I'm not fond of people hijacking my attention as a form of distraction. There are still 11 other people that I have to go through.

In post 299, Glitch wrote:I'm just gonna say Looker really bugs me with the very little contribution he has. There's nothing good he contributed here.

Would you prefer an overexaggeration of word vomit that no one's going to read? Please challenge my thoughts: With what that I've presented do you disagree? Are you accusing me of playing it safe with my first two posts of the game...? Your expectations are unclear.

In post 420, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Glitch and Looker, remind me why you two are voting Quick?

Is this sarcasm? Everything here is written down...forever...why would you need to be reminded of something...? The intent is to sort.

I should have more time to post this weekend; sorry I've been so busy.

In post 421, Looker wrote:Is this sarcasm?

Everything i have ever posted is always 100% serious.

In post 421, Looker wrote:Saudade claiming

In post 342, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Popopo
Scum has been caught. Vote GuiltyLion with me or you will be scum claiming. K tnx.

Ok senpai