Mafiascum.net

Yeah I don’t hate how klicks been I don’t really get the pervasive scumread

But there’s also one re me so this game is weird

I don't think notscience knows who is on the scumteam

I don’t know but my current team looks something like

Dunn/bob/???

Read- I don’t know who the scum team is but that is my suspected team atm bc Typing is hard

nope too late locking in that you are in a scum PT with Dunn, Bob, and Sujimichi. Four is a lot I assume you're all goons?

What would an Una scumgame look like here? Can you give me some perspective on how you play differently as town vs scum?

I only joined a gasp normal gasp game to play with Sujimichi so I am gonna only post a meme every 47 hours now.

People I'd be interested in lynching today is starting to look something like this:

bob3141
Sujimichi●
Bellaphant
Emperor flippyNips
Hoopla
popopopopopopo

With like meh maybes on Galron and Dunn.

Of course I'd have to roll a 7 or above on a d10 when push comes to shove if I actually decided to pursue a D1 Hoopla lynch.

In post 408, Klick wrote:Of course I'd have to roll a 7 or above on a d10 when push comes to shove if I actually decided to pursue a D1 Hoopla lynch.

Please keep note of the below rule.

In post 1, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:...

5.

Provable randomness

- is against the rules. Saying that you rolled a die or some dice or used random.org is fine, using dice tags or quoting from random.org is not.

...

Don't worry I'd tell Bella to leave the room first

In post 404, Isis wrote:nope too late locking in that you are in a scum PT with Dunn, Bob, and Sujimichi. Four is a lot I assume you're all goons?

Suicidal lover goons

2 sets

I want to be suicidal lover goons with Sujimichi

In post 408, Klick wrote:Of course I'd have to roll a 7 or above on a d10 when push comes to shove if I actually decided to pursue a D1 Hoopla lynch.

you wouldn't dare!

As soon as I started calling certain people scum there was a perceptible shift in the way people started treating me

In post 407, Klick wrote:People I'd be interested in lynching today is starting to look something like this:

bob3141
Sujimichi●
Bellaphant
Emperor flippyNips
Hoopla
popopopopopopo

With like meh maybes on Galron and Dunn.

You shouldn't be ok with my lynch

In post 414, Dunnstral wrote:As soon as I started calling certain people scum there was a perceptible shift in the way people started treating me

Who is doing it in particular and what does it say about their alignment?

You and UnaB and it looks bad for you and neutral for UnaB

There's a notable lack of responding to things from Isis where I expect one

Hoopla's push on me is bad

Why does it look bad for me?

In post 371, Hoopla wrote:to the people calling the geraintm "ass": is this stemming from reading geraintm behaviourally or distrusting the constituents of the wagon itself?

I think he's town for reasons Ive elaborated on before and I replied to this part while im at work. I also think its naive to assume a RVS wagon that got to 5 would have no scum on it and I'm a little concerned you think everyone is town as well.

In post 372, Hoopla wrote:when i witness someone seeing the game through the same lens as me early - though through independent means - it's often a good sign.

I like this stance even though i didnt agree with it.

In post 375, Hoopla wrote:this sequence is good. i think town is more likely to show restraint/concern here given a bob-vote could have easily been justified by popo-scum (assuming bob is town).

It is damning if bob flips scum later however. Not worth talking about now though.

In post 377, Klick wrote:Geraintm looks obvtown to me. The wagon is indeed ass.

I like drunk klick drunk klick is goodposting and I agreed with pretty much the entire post I just snipped

In post 379, Hoopla wrote:notscience and klick were the latest adopters of the bob-wagon - both slots i am wary of.

dunnstral was the first bob vote i remember disliking, flippy being more neutral. but the fact that notscience and klick got on there too. literally the last four voters of bob were suss.

how coincidental.

more likely, it was scum-pushed.

Yeah but Id stated in advance why i liked the wagon and i dont really think it was a secret on why i was there.

This feels like roping in last minute to justify departing the wagon.

In post 384, Hoopla wrote:i'm nervous that i drew town with a bunch of passive townies afraid of taking on the big dogs of the game. there's only so much heavy lifting i can do, and my vote is currently hard at work.

Who are the big dogs? Me, you, Klick, Una?

I don't think its entirely justified assuming all the vocal players are scummy and it feels way more paranoid than I expected. I guess it can kinda make sense what with the scum leaking in to the townbloc, but I kinda want to take a second look when sober.

In post 387, Klick wrote:The problem I'm having with you right now, aside from coming to wildly different conclusions on almost everything that's happened so far, is that it almost feels like you've set up a narrative that you'd like today to go by, in a way that doesn't feel entirely guided by your reads like last game. I can see this coming from you as town (and feel free to state if that is indeed something you're doing here), but I feel like there's more clear and obvious motivation for it to come from scum.

I can kinda see it I feel like her view of the gamestate feels very inorganic compared to what i expected

Because you threw shade at me twice

In all honesty Ive been thinking about it most of the game even if i didnt outright say it.

Youve come up in my ISO a handful of times-
Una asked me about an interaction and my stance on it

When I left the wagon because i wasnt as confident in it anymore because of you

and when I named you as one of my scumteam

That's shade? That seems like a stretch. The only one I'd say /could/ be shade is the unvote.

Which scumread do you think my "read change" is reactionary to?

That is unclear, but this is when it started:

In post 346, notscience wrote:Maybe dunn in the red but nothing re hoops.

In post 395, notscience wrote:UNVOTE:

I don’t think. I wanna be on a dunn lead wagon

In post 414, Dunnstral wrote:As soon as I started calling certain people scum there was a perceptible shift in the way people started treating me

So its not clear but clear enough to mention?

Or you got caught in a lie and are trying to rectify it.