Page 17 of 225

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:42 am
by unwnd
Cakez from the last game you played you weren't nearly as active. I'm not going to resign you to playing one way but your excitable levels are much higher, would you just say this is how you normally play compared to Weakest Link?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:42 am
by Battle Mage
In post 389, L4pe wrote:
In post 380, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 376, L4pe wrote:
In post 369, Firebringer wrote:
In post 354, L4pe wrote:
In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
weird thinking

the more someone posts the more reliable your read is on them

even if the content is irrelevant you can still read someone for posting garbage

im not sure why youd want to prevent people from doing this
i always feels it weird when people comment on peoples thinking when they say things like "posting too much is anti town" when it doesnt seem like a post u cn really read intent to but it doesnt look like ur reading intent. Idk weird out of place commentary to me. Maybe i am a hypocrite trying to read into a persons post about why someone would do that. Inception style.
i want a dialogue

it will give me a read
yo whats ur read on old BM?
i actually do quite like your presence in the thread

use spoiler tags though

idk i think you come off as very... spammy

but not in a bad way

and the fact that you choose to engage me like this shows a healthy level of self awareness i think
Spoiler:
thanks

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:42 am
by SirCakez
at least he mentioned me finally <3

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:42 am
by SirCakez
In post 400, unwnd wrote:Cakez from the last game you played you weren't nearly as active. I'm not going to resign you to playing one way but your excitable levels are much higher, would you just say this is how you normally play compared to Weakest Link?
it's because I have time to do shit today because my uni cancelled everything today
I won't be this active every day

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:43 am
by L4pe
Spoiler: thread
In post 389, L4pe wrote:
In post 380, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 376, L4pe wrote:
In post 369, Firebringer wrote:
In post 354, L4pe wrote:
In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
weird thinking

the more someone posts the more reliable your read is on them

even if the content is irrelevant you can still read someone for posting garbage

im not sure why youd want to prevent people from doing this
i always feels it weird when people comment on peoples thinking when they say things like "posting too much is anti town" when it doesnt seem like a post u cn really read intent to but it doesnt look like ur reading intent. Idk weird out of place commentary to me. Maybe i am a hypocrite trying to read into a persons post about why someone would do that. Inception style.
i want a dialogue

it will give me a read
yo whats ur read on old BM?
i actually do quite like your presence in the thread

use spoiler tags though

idk i think you come off as very... spammy

but not in a bad way

and the fact that you choose to engage me like this shows a healthy level of self awareness i think


addendum: by spammy i mean... posty. like, posting what you feel like? a very transparent style of play

and its usually towny to me to act like that

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:43 am
by Battle Mage
In post 399, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:
In post 366, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 154, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:
In post 121, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 94, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:VOTE: gamma emerald

-ronald reagan
tell me which head tags as what
because depending on who this is I might have concerns
i'm the senile one
well if you don't make things clear I'm gonna treat you with lowest common denominator on how bad your posting looks for the two of you
which I'ma just say one of you probably shouldn't be pushing me legitimately at this point
the vice president tells me has a good track record of reading you although it's outdated. but we both think you're scummy.
ah we have something in common then

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:43 am
by Firebringer
In post 400, unwnd wrote:Cakez from the last game you played you weren't nearly as active.
he explained he just got out of other responsibilities because of covid lol. Did u read thaat

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:43 am
by Battle Mage
In post 404, L4pe wrote:
Spoiler: thread
In post 389, L4pe wrote:
In post 380, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 376, L4pe wrote:
In post 369, Firebringer wrote:
In post 354, L4pe wrote:
In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
weird thinking

the more someone posts the more reliable your read is on them

even if the content is irrelevant you can still read someone for posting garbage

im not sure why youd want to prevent people from doing this
i always feels it weird when people comment on peoples thinking when they say things like "posting too much is anti town" when it doesnt seem like a post u cn really read intent to but it doesnt look like ur reading intent. Idk weird out of place commentary to me. Maybe i am a hypocrite trying to read into a persons post about why someone would do that. Inception style.
i want a dialogue

it will give me a read
yo whats ur read on old BM?
i actually do quite like your presence in the thread

use spoiler tags though

idk i think you come off as very... spammy

but not in a bad way

and the fact that you choose to engage me like this shows a healthy level of self awareness i think


addendum: by spammy i mean... posty. like, posting what you feel like? a very transparent style of play

and its usually towny to me to act like that
good read. can you talk some sense to cakez?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:44 am
by unwnd
In post 406, Firebringer wrote:
In post 400, unwnd wrote:Cakez from the last game you played you weren't nearly as active.
he explained he just got out of other responsibilities because of covid lol. Did u read thaat
No probably not I go back to read a page then 5 more posts ping me

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:44 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 388, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 385, Flavor Leaf wrote:So I’mma sit here, smoke a fat doink, think about where I think this game is going, then give my thoughts when they come up.

If you need a Flavor Wall post, or a Last Night Tomorrow, just at me.

I’m going off vibes this day phase
read me man, i'll love it
You’re reaching out a lot, and I don’t know if it’s because you’re town or trying to pocket me yet, haha

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:45 am
by Battle Mage
In post 408, unwnd wrote:
In post 406, Firebringer wrote:
In post 400, unwnd wrote:Cakez from the last game you played you weren't nearly as active.
he explained he just got out of other responsibilities because of covid lol. Did u read thaat
No probably not I go back to read a page then 5 more posts ping me
at least you dont have to worry about noraa in this game :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:45 am
by Firebringer
hey flavor leaaf can i get a free scum read.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:45 am
by unwnd
I think even in relation to his activity the word 'excitable' still matters, just a lot of zomg behavior when I felt in Weakest Link he was pretty clam and collected

Not a definitive tell, just adding to the proverbial thought hive that is the thread

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:45 am
by borkjerfkin
vc up to date on top of page 15.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:46 am
by Cabd
In post 410, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 408, unwnd wrote:
In post 406, Firebringer wrote:
In post 400, unwnd wrote:Cakez from the last game you played you weren't nearly as active.
he explained he just got out of other responsibilities because of covid lol. Did u read thaat
No probably not I go back to read a page then 5 more posts ping me
at least you dont have to worry about noraa in this game :lol:
Why not?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:46 am
by L4pe
In post 407, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 404, L4pe wrote:
Spoiler: thread
In post 389, L4pe wrote:
In post 380, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 376, L4pe wrote:
In post 369, Firebringer wrote:
In post 354, L4pe wrote:
In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
weird thinking

the more someone posts the more reliable your read is on them

even if the content is irrelevant you can still read someone for posting garbage

im not sure why youd want to prevent people from doing this
i always feels it weird when people comment on peoples thinking when they say things like "posting too much is anti town" when it doesnt seem like a post u cn really read intent to but it doesnt look like ur reading intent. Idk weird out of place commentary to me. Maybe i am a hypocrite trying to read into a persons post about why someone would do that. Inception style.
i want a dialogue

it will give me a read
yo whats ur read on old BM?
i actually do quite like your presence in the thread

use spoiler tags though

idk i think you come off as very... spammy

but not in a bad way

and the fact that you choose to engage me like this shows a healthy level of self awareness i think


addendum: by spammy i mean... posty. like, posting what you feel like? a very transparent style of play

and its usually towny to me to act like that
good read. can you talk some sense to cakez?
having fundamentally different ideas of how post volume should be handled means i probably wont agree with him at all on it

and im fine with that

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:46 am
by Cabd
In post 0, borkjerfkin wrote:noraa
She's in the player list?


Hello from the covid rapid testing line by the by.

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:46 am
by Battle Mage
In post 409, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 388, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 385, Flavor Leaf wrote:So I’mma sit here, smoke a fat doink, think about where I think this game is going, then give my thoughts when they come up.

If you need a Flavor Wall post, or a Last Night Tomorrow, just at me.

I’m going off vibes this day phase
read me man, i'll love it
You’re reaching out a lot, and I don’t know if it’s because you’re town or trying to pocket me yet, haha
ah it's both! in both our games together, you were town, you were loud, you townread me (eventually) and you were correct. You're a good player <3

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:47 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 411, Firebringer wrote:hey flavor leaaf can i get a free scum read.

No

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:47 am
by Battle Mage
In post 416, Cabd wrote:
In post 0, borkjerfkin wrote:noraa
She's in the player list?
yeah?

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:47 am
by ManWithNoName
In post 383, unwnd wrote:Have looked at about 4 pages now and I think even in those 4 pages ManWithNoName looked like ManWithNothingToSay

VOTE: ManWithNoName
That would have been a better name. Damn, opportunity missed!

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:47 am
by Firebringer
In post 418, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 411, Firebringer wrote:hey flavor leaaf can i get a free scum read.

No
not even if i call u the gr8test

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:47 am
by SirCakez
noraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:48 am
by Battle Mage
In post 415, L4pe wrote:
In post 407, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 404, L4pe wrote:
Spoiler: thread
In post 389, L4pe wrote:
In post 380, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 376, L4pe wrote:
In post 369, Firebringer wrote:
In post 354, L4pe wrote:
In post 343, SirCakez wrote:excessive posting is antitown
weird thinking

the more someone posts the more reliable your read is on them

even if the content is irrelevant you can still read someone for posting garbage

im not sure why youd want to prevent people from doing this
i always feels it weird when people comment on peoples thinking when they say things like "posting too much is anti town" when it doesnt seem like a post u cn really read intent to but it doesnt look like ur reading intent. Idk weird out of place commentary to me. Maybe i am a hypocrite trying to read into a persons post about why someone would do that. Inception style.
i want a dialogue

it will give me a read
yo whats ur read on old BM?
i actually do quite like your presence in the thread

use spoiler tags though

idk i think you come off as very... spammy

but not in a bad way

and the fact that you choose to engage me like this shows a healthy level of self awareness i think


addendum: by spammy i mean... posty. like, posting what you feel like? a very transparent style of play

and its usually towny to me to act like that
good read. can you talk some sense to cakez?
having fundamentally different ideas of how post volume should be handled means i probably wont agree with him at all on it

and im fine with that
i have to wonder if L4pe town would fight for his reads though

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 9:48 am
by Cabd
In post 419, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 416, Cabd wrote:
In post 0, borkjerfkin wrote:noraa
She's in the player list?
yeah?
So why say that noraa isn't worried about. Did I miss context?