Page 17 of 158
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:58 pm
by PenguinPower
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 1:58 pm
by ben dover123
Hi all.
In post 378, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: ben dover not really SRing him, but not townreading him either and I like the wagon composition
Bridgeburners wrote:VOTE: bend over
PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: ben
NM's E-1
This is certainly not what I was looking to see when I came back.
What are the reason for all of these votes? Have I suddenly become consensus scum now?
tbh this now just feels like a dogpile with a wagon this quick. I can't say that scum is on this wagon but it feels way too smooth with these 3 consecutive votes here.
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:00 pm
by Bridgeburners
Hello!
I tr: penguin, infinity, and dats fairly strongly
~ skitter
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:02 pm
by Infinity 324
All questions and comments relating to the allegations against ben dover123 should be taken to the offices of datisi, implosion, and Scipio1
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:06 pm
by ben dover123
In case any of you didn't know, we are just 2 days into the game. Should be common knowledge already but even if I have turned into consensus scum all of a sudden now we still should save time for discussion before a hang.
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:11 pm
by Scipio1
so your defense is that we shouldn't quickhammer because of discussion time and not because, y'know, you're not scum?
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:12 pm
by Infinity 324
I don't think we should end the day early
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:13 pm
by Bridgeburners
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:14 pm
by Infinity 324
I and others hunt scum best when there's a lot of info to sort through
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:15 pm
by ben dover123
In post 405, Scipio1 wrote:so your defense is that we shouldn't quickhammer because of discussion time and not because, y'know, you're not scum?
I've already defended myself on that front, if you haven't noticed already. And if you want to quickhammer now with 11 days left of discussion, then be my guest.
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:15 pm
by Bridgeburners
But what if we did it for the memes?
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:16 pm
by Bridgeburners
I mean I’m kind of fucking around but also dragging the day out is pointless
I think we should be aiming to get a claim out of someone within the next 3-4 days and to elim in the next 5-6
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:16 pm
by Bridgeburners
We can improve our win % by artificially acting as though the deadline is at 8 days and not 14
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:17 pm
by Datisi
hello guess who's suffering from insomnia
In post 401, ben dover123 wrote:tbh this now just feels like a dogpile with a wagon this quick. I can't say that scum is on this wagon but it feels way too smooth with these 3 consecutive votes here.
is this all? like, none of the votes ping you anywhere? not questioning anyone? just "oh idk if scum here but quick wagon"?
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:17 pm
by Bridgeburners
Also, just a reminder: 8 days is the perfect length of day bar none and all games should be 8d/48h in format
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:18 pm
by ben dover123
In post 411, Bridgeburners wrote:I mean I’m kind of fucking around but also dragging the day out is pointless
I think we should be aiming to get a claim out of someone within the next 3-4 days and to elim in the next 5-6
-QB
Uh, no it isn't. The more time we have to discuss the better. We always want to have maximum info before a hang, especially D1, and people these days have forgotten about this train of thought.
Datisi wrote:
is this all? like, none of the votes ping you anywhere? not questioning anyone? just "oh idk if scum here but quick wagon"?
The last 2 votes definitely ping me, and I have asked for why they voted because it just looks like a flat out dogpile at this point.
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:19 pm
by Datisi
In post 415, ben dover123 wrote:Uh, no it isn't. The more time we have to discuss the better. We always want to have maximum info before a hang, especially D1, and people these days have forgotten about this train of thought.
no
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:19 pm
by Bridgeburners
What if I have actual empirical proof that this is untrue?
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:19 pm
by Bridgeburners
Or datisi can put it more concisely than me, that works too
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:20 pm
by Datisi
i'm the one who showed you the empirical proof after all
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:20 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 411, Bridgeburners wrote:I think we should be aiming to get a claim out of someone within the next 3-4 days and to elim in the next 5-6
I'm ok with this
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:21 pm
by Bridgeburners
Shhhh, nobody needs to know that
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:23 pm
by Bridgeburners
In post 401, ben dover123 wrote:I can't say that scum is on this wagon but it feels way too smooth with these 3 consecutive votes here
Why are you more concerned about the latter end?
-QB
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:23 pm
by Datisi
bleh i typed up a post asking what changed taht you're now voting ben but you were never the one townreading him, it was skitt
does skitt subscribe to the ben vote now?
also skitt tldr on me and Infinity reads would be grand
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:24 pm
by Bridgeburners
Also, dats, do you have experience with Ben?
-QB