Page 17 of 263

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:15 am
by Annie Edison
COBRA KAI

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:21 am
by ManateeGal
In post 397, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 395, ManateeGal wrote:i like aa9 a lot so far
why?
they feel really natural and pure

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:24 am
by Sleez
VOTE: Lukewarm

Least comfortable vote on Medea, so much that even himself couldn't believe it. . Fraudulent behavior.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:27 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 399, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 398, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 394, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 355, Medea the Alien wrote:Nah, I like Tammy as a person but have never had fun dancing with her in games. That might change if we play again!

--PA
This was my way of telling you there's ambiguity in your message from my perspective.
disambiguation would be good.
Knee deep in realizing we got our shelving units returned to us without the actual fucking rods to rebuild them with. Right now if I hold up the receiver all you're going to get is demonic screeching.
Sorry to hear that. But please reduce the ambiguity so that FF knows exactly what you are.
-Bell

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:34 am
by ArcAngel9
In post 387, Annie Edison wrote:Bell let’s assume for a second you’re wrong and I’m town. Who’s scum?
You haven't answered my question about Meda, what do you think about their wagon?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:36 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 403, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 399, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 398, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 394, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 355, Medea the Alien wrote:Nah, I like Tammy as a person but have never had fun dancing with her in games. That might change if we play again!

--PA
This was my way of telling you there's ambiguity in your message from my perspective.
disambiguation would be good.
Knee deep in realizing we got our shelving units returned to us without the actual fucking rods to rebuild them with. Right now if I hold up the receiver all you're going to get is demonic screeching.
Sorry to hear that. But please reduce the ambiguity so that FF knows exactly what you are.
-Bell
I thought metaphor crumbing was evil! Tell that to miss smugstelle~

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:37 am
by ArcAngel9
Penguin - Talk to me. are you scum?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:38 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 406, ArcAngel9 wrote:Penguin - Talk to me. are you scum?
Sorry, Penguin is currently occupied murdering cardboard. I'll let her know you called.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:39 am
by ArcAngel9
You could have answered why did you choose to ignore my question about your alignment

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:41 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 408, ArcAngel9 wrote:You could have answered why did you choose to ignore my question about your alignment
I AM LITERALLY NOT PENGUIN.

I am sure that this will greatly amuse her to have shoe on other foot for once.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:44 am
by Titus
If I am alive, in a day or two, I would request to be made demonic if no other target. It'll make me more readable. I imagine there's stronger powers but I know people struggle to read me.

At bottom of page 5.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:45 am
by Titus
In post 130, Dunnstral wrote:
Spoiler: ManateeGal
In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
In post 53, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 48, Sleez wrote:
In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
What's interesting about it?
your phrasing
In post 64, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 55, Sleez wrote:
In post 53, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 48, Sleez wrote:
In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
What's interesting about it?
your phrasing
Not the fact people are being scummy?
no...? considering theres been like 3 pages and you havent outlined who youre talking about
In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players
In post 93, ManateeGal wrote:i'd assume the number of players that start demonic is 4-5 if 7 demonic players for a maf win


- is a bad response because I don't think the "phrasing" is the interesting part, or what that entails
- is scummy for asking about this and the response feels off.
- is worded like mafia write things and this is an easy angle for scum to take when discussing this mechanic
- seems like bad reasoning

Overall I think scum

VOTE: ManateeGal
Dunn's my first TR.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:47 am
by Lukewarm
In post 402, Sleez wrote:VOTE: Lukewarm

Least comfortable vote on Medea, so much that even himself couldn't believe it. . Fraudulent behavior.
What does this mean?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:47 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
In post 411, Titus wrote:
In post 130, Dunnstral wrote:
Spoiler: ManateeGal
In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
In post 53, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 48, Sleez wrote:
In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
What's interesting about it?
your phrasing
In post 64, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 55, Sleez wrote:
In post 53, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 48, Sleez wrote:
In post 46, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 45, Sleez wrote:People are being scummy already but I only have one vote.
interesting
What's interesting about it?
your phrasing
Not the fact people are being scummy?
no...? considering theres been like 3 pages and you havent outlined who youre talking about
In post 90, ManateeGal wrote:i am hesitant abt shards bc from my understanding a certain amount turns a player demonic and mafia win w 7 demonic players
In post 93, ManateeGal wrote:i'd assume the number of players that start demonic is 4-5 if 7 demonic players for a maf win


- is a bad response because I don't think the "phrasing" is the interesting part, or what that entails
- is scummy for asking about this and the response feels off.
- is worded like mafia write things and this is an easy angle for scum to take when discussing this mechanic
- seems like bad reasoning

Overall I think scum

VOTE: ManateeGal
Dunn's my first TR.
[!!]

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:47 am
by Titus
In post 209, ManateeGal wrote:everyone skirting around normal communication is not helping
Mindmeld here.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:49 am
by Titus
In post 228, Annie Edison wrote:I’ve liked Pooky so far he’s kinda reminded me of tarot Pooky

But I’m not really ever the best at reading him

I’ll see what bulge thinks when he’s around
Hmmph. Interesting.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:50 am
by Titus
At bottom of page 10

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:51 am
by Lady Lambdadelta
In post 414, Titus wrote:
In post 209, ManateeGal wrote:everyone skirting around normal communication is not helping
Mindmeld here.
[X]

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:01 am
by Medea the Alien
In post 377, ArcAngel9 wrote:Also Penguin - Talk to me. Are you scum
In post 409, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 408, ArcAngel9 wrote:You could have answered why did you choose to ignore my question about your alignment
I AM LITERALLY NOT PENGUIN.

I am sure that this will greatly amuse her to have shoe on other foot for once.
Aw! Someone likes me better! :glomps onto forever:
In post 266, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 264, Annie Edison wrote:Hi PA! Are you town?
For my sins.

--PA
No, not scum. You? And what do you think of Sleez's posting overall?

Titus, ten pages in, you've seen the bulk of our wagon built, thoughts?

--PA

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:06 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 330, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 329, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 327, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 321, Medea the Alien wrote:Do you think Dunn is a player inclined to be led around by the nose? And why the jump to characterizing a request for another player's read on a third person as outsourcing then? Given that he also doesn't feel good about us, I'm hardly likely to take him as gospel.

--PA
You are thinking about it backwards.

270 is structured as "dunn talk to me about Lukewarm" followed by weak reasons you might be concerned about me. Vague suspicions without actually saying that you thought I was leaning scum or anything.

Given that structure, it looks like you are either

1) Suspicious of me, and are looking to Dunn to confirm your suspicions (ie outsourceing the read) or

2) Trying to help build up dunn's scum read, so he would push it more.

I don't think that you or cabd would ever do 1, which left me suspicious that it was 2
There's a third way.
which is?
asking questions about Dunn's read of you in order to develop a read on Dunn.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:10 am
by Lukewarm
In post 419, Snarky Fishes wrote:asking questions about Dunn's read of you in order to develop a read on Dunn.
Am I correct in my assumption that this is Bell answering a question that Ffery said she was purposefully not answering, and not ffery revealing this as the answer she left me waiting for? lol

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:11 am
by Sleez
In post 412, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 402, Sleez wrote:VOTE: Lukewarm

Least comfortable vote on Medea, so much that even himself couldn't believe it. . Fraudulent behavior.
What does this mean?
You know what it means. This isn't a riddle for you to figure out, unless you're new usually your vote is meant to have purpose. Yet it didn't, and nothing you say to me feels like it comes from a process where you're concerned about reads.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:11 am
by Titus
In post 338, Annie Edison wrote:I feel like I have too many townreads.
Maybe my instinct is wrong, back to nullscum.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:12 am
by Snarky Fishes
In post 420, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 419, Snarky Fishes wrote:asking questions about Dunn's read of you in order to develop a read on Dunn.
Am I correct in my assumption that this is Bell answering a question that Ffery said she was purposefully not answering, and not ffery revealing this as the answer she left me waiting for? lol
you are not correct

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:13 am
by Medea the Alien
This hydra is 2 for 2!