Mafiascum.net

why does it matter

In post 398, Roden wrote:Not sure what you mean by this?

I had LQ wrongly pushing me over my questioning in 235, now GMo did it here

I cannot recall a single game where I’ve been scum and been suspected for asking pointless questions

VOTE: Kop

I hate his readslist is likely all town.

In post 395, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm still getting my bearings tbh

In post 396, Save The Dragons wrote:you're worth pressuring tho

Ah. Just assumed you had more because you said I'm scum.

I'll also be sporadic until tomorrow afternoon.

In post 400, Save The Dragons wrote:why does it matter

Because im looking to see if you actually have any reads of substance? Or are all of your votes reaction tests

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I didn't notice the no daytalk thing but I don't think that's the kind of thing scum Hockey would do.

In post 406, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 400, Save The Dragons wrote:why does it matter

Because im looking to see if you actually have any reads of substance? Or are all of your votes reaction tests

i vote wherever the wind takes me

In post 403, Titus wrote:VOTE: Kop

I hate his readslist is likely all town.

Sure his readslist may be bad, but do u think its all town ? Cuz i'll be very very suprised if all of you,T3,gpa and gamma are town lol

In post 378, Kop wrote:

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I'm only saying that it could be easy to do that. I'm not saying that he did it here, but I've seen it before.

Scum impressions so far, is within Gamma, Grandpa, Titus, T3.

You're basically scumreading everyone who has captured the attention of the game.

In post 401, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 398, Roden wrote:Not sure what you mean by this?

I had LQ wrongly pushing me over my questioning in 235, now GMo did it here

I think it's a playstyle thing then. I've noticed people lock on to other slots that ask a lot of questions. LQ is also just LQ.

In post 402, Gamma Emerald wrote:I cannot recall a single game where I’ve been scum and been suspected for asking pointless questions

Are you saying it's a town tell then?

In post 383, Kop wrote:

In post 376, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma

This slot is theater-ing somebody but I'm not sure who yet. I don't think the third scum isn't interacting with Gamma at all.

Wait, I'm either not knowing the full facts of this setup, but how would you know there is 3 scum on the same team?

It's standard site meta that in a 13p game there are 3 scum. This seems like a fake excuse to scumread someone. VOTE: Kop

In post 408, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 406, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 400, Save The Dragons wrote:why does it matter

Because im looking to see if you actually have any reads of substance? Or are all of your votes reaction tests

i vote wherever the wind takes me

sigh

In post 387, DrippingGoofball wrote:Hockey is town.

In post 390, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 373, Kop wrote:

In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho

I can see your point on it being a town tell, but could easily be scum faking that they didn't know.

Kop is scum.

In post 391, DrippingGoofball wrote:t3 is town.

I kind of want to townbin DGB for these posts being consistent with her town meta but at the same time there is the changing playstyle thing.

In post 412, T3 wrote:It's standard site meta that in a 13p game there are 3 scum.

is this true?

In post 408, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 406, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 400, Save The Dragons wrote:why does it matter

Because im looking to see if you actually have any reads of substance? Or are all of your votes reaction tests

i vote wherever the wind takes me

bruh.jpg

In post 415, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 412, T3 wrote:It's standard site meta that in a 13p game there are 3 scum.

is this true?

At least in recent [~2-3 years] normals, yes.

In post 412, T3 wrote:

In post 383, Kop wrote:

In post 376, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma

This slot is theater-ing somebody but I'm not sure who yet. I don't think the third scum isn't interacting with Gamma at all.

Wait, I'm either not knowing the full facts of this setup, but how would you know there is 3 scum on the same team?

It's standard site meta that in a 13p game there are 3 scum. This seems like a fake excuse to scumread someone. VOTE: Kop

How am I using that as a fake reason to scum read someone?

Yes I am fully aware that it's standard 3 scum in a game of this size, but I wasn't fully aware that it's no longer allowed multiball. I had a hiatus for quite sometime so wasn't aware of rule changes regarding multiball. And not seeing the full setup, I wasn't totally sure that it's all mafia.

I'm not scum reading Gamma based on that.

In post 376, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma

This slot is theater-ing somebody but I'm not sure who yet. I don't think the third scum isn't interacting with Gamma at all.

Hard disagree, why do you think this

STD is being kinda scummy with the unexplained and seemingly random reads (though I do get where he is coming from with most of them) but STD is attracting a lot of attention in a way I think scum would try to avoid.

In post 418, Kop wrote:

In post 412, T3 wrote:

In post 383, Kop wrote:

In post 376, Roden wrote:VOTE: Gamma

This slot is theater-ing somebody but I'm not sure who yet. I don't think the third scum isn't interacting with Gamma at all.

Wait, I'm either not knowing the full facts of this setup, but how would you know there is 3 scum on the same team?

It's standard site meta that in a 13p game there are 3 scum. This seems like a fake excuse to scumread someone. VOTE: Kop

How am I using that as a fake reason to scum read someone?

Yes I am fully aware that it's standard 3 scum in a game of this size, but I wasn't fully aware that it's no longer allowed multiball. I had a hiatus for quite sometime so wasn't aware of rule changes regarding multiball. And not seeing the full setup, I wasn't totally sure that it's all mafia.

I'm not scum reading Gamma based on that.

Ah.
UNVOTE:

StD's playstyle is abusing TSTBS no matter his alignment. Also lazy posting but he's actually quite a bit more active this game.

In post 392, DrippingGoofball wrote:Superb Owl 9 should have an owl avatar.

I do just look really close
It's quite superb may i add

In post 420, T3 wrote:STD is being kinda scummy with the unexplained and seemingly random reads (though I do get where he is coming from with most of them) but STD is attracting a lot of attention in a way I think scum would try to avoid.

TSTBS is usually bad but not here ftr

Why is using TSTBS to read someone in this case not bad? seems odd that u get to pick and choose when certain things matter? this your scum buddy?