Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2021 5:54 pm
i'd like it if you could try to explain this when you're calmer because the signal:noise is very low right now
I agree with you that the “disagree = scummy” thing is stupid as fuck, and Cephrir’s response basically did nothing to actually address what you said about itIn post 380, SCP 999 wrote:like its 2021 - why are we still equating certain actions to scum actions?
just call it a policy and don't pretend it is otherwise.
How the hell else am I supposed to take you calling your approach to SM acceptable and then slamming us when we’ve basically done the same damn shit in that department? I don’t think mechanics and meta talk are fair things to push us on when the game had barely started generating real content when SM got hammered and meta is basically the backbone of my playstyle, as much as I try to fight it.In post 389, Cephrir wrote:you can't just call everything you don't like bad faith. it's not a good way to start a conversation when i literally know for a fact that it is not in bad faith.In post 387, Infinity Zero wrote:While it’d probably be fun to gab about this I also kinda don’t wanna when your SR on me is in terrible faith? Like, you are clearly blind to the fact the same shit you seem to be pushing us for is the same shit you pulled.In post 320, Cephrir wrote:I guess probably no one but gamma will understand that post
-Gamma
i don't really have any idea what you're talking about though.
These reads are basically perfectly in line with how me and Infinity are both perceiving this game rnIn post 386, SCP 999 wrote:town:
dunns
cephir
infinity
LLD(purely mech - should be discarded later on if nothing dayplay wise shows up)
ampharos
galron
the almost town timeout corner because i might be a little salty but also not that confident:
dwlee
honestly cannot feel this one out either way:
roden
le scum:
sircakez
zyla
unordered within tiers
a few slots i need to holistically examine to make sure but im not pressed when i literally cant die unless town really wants to discard logic so.
i don't feel that we have done the same shit in that department. different posts are different even if they include the same votes. i also feel that this pissiness from you is your scum meta, but i know that hearing that isn't going to helpIn post 402, Infinity Zero wrote:How the hell else am I supposed to take you calling your approach to SM acceptable and then slamming us when we’ve basically done the same damn shit in that department? I don’t think mechanics and meta talk are fair things to push us on when the game had barely started generating real content when SM got hammered and meta is basically the backbone of my playstyle, as much as I try to fight it.
on a quick skim of your iso this is the only post i see that fits the above description, but i could be missing something.In post 176, Infinity Zero wrote:Could someone please tell me why the hell we’re actually getting sussed? The most I’ve seen was Ceph saying that we’re “focused on mechanics” which at least on my part I don’t feel like I have been, and I think picking at me for talking about other games in relation to this one is the dumbest fucking thing ever for Cephrir who’s played me plenty enough to know that’s how I am. And everyone that isn’t Cephrir has done jack-fucking-all to rationalize SRing us.
-Gamma
? all i was saying is that i made an inference about who cakez was accusing there and it was really not that much of a reach (because again, only 2 votes on dwlee)In post 377, Dunnstral wrote:I thought that after I made my post and was thinking you would say that as well.In post 373, Infinity Zero wrote:As I see it 304 is basically innocuous if you see that it’s responding to Cakez’s posting as a while where he expresses suspicion on us and then suggests Dwlee as the designated mislim (despite no real evidence in favor imo),
However, your hydra responded with the following instead:
Which was a different, reachy angle, and I consider that to be scummy.In post 335, Infinity Zero wrote:there have been 2 votes on dwlee this whole game come on dudeIn post 322, SirCakez wrote:i literally said dwlee is a scum designated mislim with no mention of any names and you somehow felt the post was addressed to you IZ
guilty conscience
-infinity
In post 231, Galron wrote:Dwlee doesn't seem upset their hammer was taken.
I was wrong about Dwlee.In post 113, Dwlee99 wrote:I wanted to give them a chance to actually flavor claim smh