I'll tell you this, though... you would be my n1 target 10 times out of 10 if I had rolled red.
It's not like you just suddenly started pushing me out of the blue, you know.
Whomever it is probably knew that leaving you alive would be more beneficial to their win con than killing you to frame me, because as long as there's a scapegoat handy, they can just sit back & *popcorn*.
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:53 pm
by House
VOTE: Testarossa
This is my best guess, because of:
Spoiler:
In post 7, Testarossa wrote:frogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsVOTE: frogsfrogs
I ONLY SEE FROGS !!!
I don't know if it's still site meta, but before I left it was common to see a member of scum vote a buddy.
It's safer than picking a random townie and potentially being called on the carpet for it.
In post 340, Testarossa wrote:frogs might have been more null to me, but Andante's 304 is pretty much what is my issue with them too.
Additionally I am wondering a bit about their progression with scumreading both Andante and dwlee, who have been both on the Megwagon, keeping Meg null and then going over to focus on questioning Meg. Maybe frogs can clarify this, but I find it odd that they go over to suspecting the one who is pushed by their scumreads, while frogs neither really interacted much with dwlee nor did dwlee themselves do that much.
Scum likes to keep their buddies in null/lean range. Piggybacking andante's reason rubs me wrong, as well.
Also, looks like she's setting the stage for a Meg vote. I don't know if that came before or after the wagon on her. Something for me to look into after this post.
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:54 pm
by House
Derp. I misread 340 in my skim.
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2021 9:56 pm
by House
I'm tired. Long day today.
Can't get to sleep, but can't think either.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:10 am
by Datisi
wouldn't it be really funny if i
VOTE: dwlee
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 3:30 am
by Dwlee99
Datisi do you think I E-1 my partner and tell them to claim VT and then just dip from the thread
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 3:39 am
by Datisi
why is scum then
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 3:43 am
by Dwlee99
Who? Idk
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 3:44 am
by Dwlee99
Datisi
Megazumarill
Andante
Testarossa
House
Kennyk
In post 7, Testarossa wrote:frogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsVOTE: frogsfrogs
I ONLY SEE FROGS !!!
I don't know if it's still site meta, but before I left it was common to see a member of scum vote a buddy.
It's safer than picking a random townie and potentially being called on the carpet for it.
uh what? the theme of the game is frogs? that's what I thought the frogsfrogsfrogs stuff was about? nothing related to the player frogs? as soon as I saw the theme and that we had a frogs in the game I laughed
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 6:52 am
by House
In post 414, Dwlee99 wrote:Datisi
Megazumarill
Andante
Testarossa
House
Kennyk
This list contains at least one scum
Does that help
I can't even hate on this post, because the feels, man... the feels...
In post 7, Testarossa wrote:frogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsfrogsVOTE: frogsfrogs
I ONLY SEE FROGS !!!
I don't know if it's still site meta, but before I left it was common to see a member of scum vote a buddy.
It's safer than picking a random townie and potentially being called on the carpet for it.
uh what? the theme of the game is frogs? that's what I thought the frogsfrogsfrogs stuff was about? nothing related to the player frogs? as soon as I saw the theme and that we had a frogs in the game I laughed
You didn't know we had a frogs in the game... but you voted for 'frogsfrogs' instead of 'frogs'?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:34 am
by House
Oh derp again... andante what's with you replying to 407 as if it was about you?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:00 pm
by Andante
In post 418, House wrote:Oh derp again... andante what's with you replying to 407 as if it was about you?
what are you asking? You gave a reason someone was scum. I disagreed, and thus said something
In post 418, House wrote:Oh derp again... andante what's with you replying to 407 as if it was about you?
what are you asking? You gave a reason someone was scum. I disagreed, and thus said something
Claimed not to know frogsfrogs was in the game, but voted for frogsfrogs, instead of simply 'frogs', when she claimed her vote was regarding the theme?
In post 418, House wrote:Oh derp again... andante what's with you replying to 407 as if it was about you?
what are you asking? You gave a reason someone was scum. I disagreed, and thus said something
Claimed not to know frogsfrogs was in the game, but voted for frogsfrogs, instead of simply 'frogs', when she claimed her vote was regarding the theme?
