Mafiascum.net

While i disagree with Alex's read on Elsa, I think his defense comes from a townie perspective.

VOTE: Geraintm

Geraint is my best bet for scum, he's been suggesting anti-town behavior and is actively doing anti-town things. Like:

In post 138, geraintm wrote:my vote for clidd was purely random

and

In post 329, geraintm wrote:

In post 322, Crescent wrote: We have less than 3 days left and an 8-way vote split. This is a

nightmare scenario

for town. We have virtually no control over who gets voted off like this and no way of actually pressuring anyone.

I said this immediately when I saw how split the vote is. If you're town and not alarmed by that vote spread that's a you problem.

It doesnt matter who scum is. They've loved how this day has progressed so far. This goes double if NM is town.

then lets just no vote, that surely has to be better than what you are expecting to happen

Literally voting at random is better than a no-vote. No-votes give us absolutely no information.


@Geraintm: gun to head, who would you eliminate right now?

In post 273, Corwinoid wrote:

In post 272, Crescent wrote:He seriously just put names in random order on a rainbow font while of course putting himself at the bottom.

Why do you people even let this guy sign up for games? How do you read such nonsense

Just wait, it gets worse.

No really, I checked, it does. But apparently he gets a lot of kudos after games, so, Not_Bad_at_Mafia?

He's apparently pretty good when he tries.

But you basically can't let a wagon to go to L-1 or he just hammers.

Leaving things at L-2 is what Datisi calls N_M-1

In post 343, gibus wrote:I've got nothing new to bring to the table except that the case on ger is flimsy as hell

Can you atleast tell us why you're still voting Elsa? Popping in to shade a wagon and then saying you have nothing to add, while on a wagon you're not actively pushing says you're on a vanity wagon.

In post 362, Crescent wrote:Would sure be nice if anyone would compare GB here to Uncle Vanya last game because it's apparently the same person but there's exactly one post GB has made all game that vibes remotely similarly to the 27 he made last game.

I feel like there's been some active resistance from some people into actually looking into GB.

I tried to be more serious as Vanya, check the signature, it's some depressing quote from the movie.

I usually joke around in Mafia games, and especially during RVS.

In post 398, Corwinoid wrote:

Crescent wrote:It's true he has not named anyone else as scummy, but he's also been somewhat engaged. I'm still null on Unowen though - It's nowhere near as bad as players like George.

Somewhat engaged how? The only people with less posts are gibus, GB and NM (and the mod), and almost half (5/13) of his posts including his RVS are engaging with me exclusively. This looks a lot more like someone trying to hide and shade a slot than any actual engagement.

Agreed, Uno hasn't moved their vote since RVS and the shade in [post]307[post] feels like, er, posturing? Or would the right word be rallying.

Like whether or not they should move their vote in case there's any traction.

In post 249, Vivax wrote:This post feels fluffy, lacks followup (who are 'the people who were voting' besides alex?). At worst it's a mafia post, at best George is being lazy.

It was less an accusation and more of a "the opposite is more likely to be true in your logic". Although it was Gibus, Unowen and me.

In post 389, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:I said I wasn't going to take a side in the argument yet, because both players looked scummy, but I didn't think it was a Scum/scum interaction, and I wasn't sure who was scummier and didn't want to draw an arbitrary line.

This is such a non-position to take. "They look scummy, but they're not both scum, and I can't decide who's scummier so I wont choose one".

In post 392, Crescent wrote:Like, if people are too lazy to compare all of GB's 27 posts last game to his all of 9 here then that's on them. This is... 3? 5? minutes of work apparently no one in the game wants to put in. It's honestly kind of pathetic.

A lot of people just don't give a shit about games they're not in.

Remember when Titus kept telling people to read Titus v Alisae to justify her posting?

clidd sus for lack of benedict cumberbatch gifs


gotta pump those numbers up

In post 405, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 392, Crescent wrote:Like, if people are too lazy to compare all of GB's 27 posts last game to his all of 9 here then that's on them. This is... 3? 5? minutes of work apparently no one in the game wants to put in. It's honestly kind of pathetic.

A lot of people just don't give a shit about games they're not in.

Remember when Titus kept telling people to read Titus v Alisae to justify her posting?

^^^

@George, what do you think of Crescent's voting?

In post 400, GeorgeBailey wrote:While i disagree with Alex's read on Elsa, I think his defense comes from a townie perspective.

VOTE: Geraintm

Geraint is my best bet for scum, he's been suggesting anti-town behavior and is actively doing anti-town things. Like:

In post 138, geraintm wrote:my vote for clidd was purely random

and

In post 329, geraintm wrote:

In post 322, Crescent wrote: We have less than 3 days left and an 8-way vote split. This is a

nightmare scenario

for town. We have virtually no control over who gets voted off like this and no way of actually pressuring anyone.

I said this immediately when I saw how split the vote is. If you're town and not alarmed by that vote spread that's a you problem.

It doesnt matter who scum is. They've loved how this day has progressed so far. This goes double if NM is town.

then lets just no vote, that surely has to be better than what you are expecting to happen

Literally voting at random is better than a no-vote. No-votes give us absolutely no information.

My problem with Gera is anti-town =/= scum. Only thing of his that feels very gross is his mention of a no elimination today.

This may sound stupid but I'm tired and it's been on my mind and re-reading added to it. I was siding with Eira more from that argument they were having with Cres. I didn't wanna interrupt it either, so now I feel less better Cres but not enough for her to be my target today in the slightest. Day 2 though after we see some flips I'll add this and my previous list and see something happen.

well something's up.... something major changed here and the interactions after Crescent's unvote might be key later on. We'll see.

some crackpot part of me is seeing an Elsa/Crescent/Gibus scumteam, but I got no evidence to support this. Elsa is the greenest out of those three imo. might have more on this later or discount it in its entirety.

Anyway I promised I'd go over Gibus/George/Geraintm/Corwinoid so yeah choo choo.

In post 95, gibus wrote:

In post 58, clidd wrote: @Gibus
Why did you vote Crescent if you said that your vote was ''bad''?

as a dog person, I say we lynch all cat people

here Gib provides a reason. missed this.
Up to #246 Crescent still has gibus pegged as town, state they missed their vote on Elsa cos lack of 'Jay'. I can chalk Crescent's behavior up to error, still undecided, but posting Gib's direct clarification of vote here. Is this enough a reason to green Gib? Gib vote still seems pretty much random to me.

In post 400, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 343, gibus wrote:I've got nothing new to bring to the table except that the case on ger is flimsy as hell

Can you atleast tell us why you're still voting Elsa? Popping in to shade a wagon and then saying you have nothing to add, while on a wagon you're not actively pushing says you're on a vanity wagon.

90 really only gained credibility over time.
And her read on clidd was premature.

I should point out that the games clidd mentioned were a lot more fast paced than this one. Not sure if the meta read is very accurate.
I'd much rather elim Elsa over ger if it were up to me.

In post 415, gibus wrote:I should point out that the games clidd mentioned were a lot more fast paced than this one. Not sure if the meta read is very accurate.
I'd much rather elim Elsa over ger if it were up to me.

ok but if not Elsa then where would your vote be atm?

What's your reads on Crescent, George, and Corwinoid?

In post 406, GeorgeBailey wrote:clidd sus for lack of benedict cumberbatch gifs

gotta pump those numbers up

I miss you, my friend.

We're kind of destined to play opposite alignments, but hopefully this time things will be different, right?

UNVOTE: Gibus[

Ok, I think we should just elim Gera and then start hunting the rest of mafia tomorrow.

I take responsibility for this push/flip if wrong, but his slot stinks as *scum but trying to appear scummy town* imo.

no

Who do you want then?

ill be posting my vote soon.

Alright, no problem.

I'll do a reread later to check if something changes.

In post 393, Corwinoid wrote:

In post 307, UNOwen wrote:

In post 305, Elsa Jay wrote: Won't say who yet but reading the last four pages made 2 people move up in my town list and 1 down. I'm here to interact all day as well.

Where is Corwin on your list and why?

I really want to know what your fascination with me is. Since your RVS vote you haven't even looked anywhere else or engaged meaningfully with any other slot in the game. Seriously, what's going on here?

VOTE: UNOwen

Scummy post.

UNVOTE: GeorgeBailey
VOTE: Corwinoid