Mafiascum.net

Hmm, a little more suspicious of Scccccccccrdbrrr now.

-Mistress

In post 398, Herta wrote:

In post 389, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 349, Herta wrote:

In post 327, Ircher wrote:

In post 321, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:@Ircher, who do you sr other than Titus and who are your townreads?

~Nancy

From town to scum:

Ircher
Vanderscamp
SCRRRDBEAR
Don Draper x Mistress (hydra of Nancy Drew 39 and Auro)
furtiveglance
Enchant
Porkens
Herta
Titus

If ircher scum I'd look at furtivegalance draper or enchant as partner so I don't think ircher as scummy now since I townread those three.

I don’t see the connections.

If you read my ISO you should be able to see how I concluded that a scum!Ircher isn't partnered with Porkens or Titus.

In post 358, Herta wrote:

In post 351, Titus wrote:I have to be able to call a spade a spade. That's reality.

Anyway, Herta's last post looks rather tmi.

VOTE: Herta

A scum bum isn't likely to slot their partner at the top or bottom. Most likely a partner would land in the middle tier.

You, being at the bottom for ircher, isn't scum indicative. Same for porkens.

None of this is particularly persuasive. In LOST, scum had their buddies in every category - from trs to srs. I don’t think Ircher is scum but you’re analysis is bad.

~Nancy

When you have four or five mafia it's easy to spread them out. You have to really. My thinking may be incorrect, but we know we have two mafia in this game. If I suspect one of them, I'm guessing they're not going to explicitly town read or scum read their partner.

Porkens wagon lookin kinda clean thooo

In post 332, Titus wrote:Look, can someone explain how the timeline works or doesn't work here?

This looks consistent to me:

In post 288, Ircher wrote:

In post 285, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:Where is Ircher’s content? Enchant is doing a lot more than the three of you.

THe site was down for 2+ days, and I explained last time I was here that I ddin't have much time to read through.

It looks like Ircher missed a bunch between Thursday and Friday, 23 hours, and was catching up and then the server outage. If a read or something changed, I can relate because the site being down forced me to re-orient as well.

Retract sus on Herta, was never feeling it

In post 174, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 173, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 157, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:HEY MISTRESS DO YOU WANT TO DOGPILE ON VANDER? I AM RUNNING OUT OF SUSPECTS. IM DOWN TO VANDER AND PORKENS.

I thought you wanted Porkens.....explain why you now prefer Vander

I DON'T PREFER EITHER I SUSPECT BOTH NOW THROUGH POE. TITUS IS DOWN FOR VANDER SO I ASK DON X MISTRESS BECAUSE IF BOTH WANT THEN IT'S EASIER TO PUSH THROUGH.

In post 179, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 175, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 174, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 173, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 157, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:HEY MISTRESS DO YOU WANT TO DOGPILE ON VANDER? I AM RUNNING OUT OF SUSPECTS. IM DOWN TO VANDER AND PORKENS.

I thought you wanted Porkens.....explain why you now prefer Vander

I DON'T PREFER EITHER I SUSPECT BOTH NOW THROUGH POE. TITUS IS DOWN FOR VANDER SO I ASK DON X MISTRESS BECAUSE IF BOTH WANT THEN IT'S EASIER TO PUSH THROUGH.

Titus is sus though. Don't you agree that Enchant/Herta are bad scumreads?

IM NOT CONVINCED TITUS IS SUS THOUGH. IF SHE IS FIGHTING WITH NANCY TO CREATE DRAMA IT CAN BACKFIRE AND IS LOT OF WORK. MORE LIKELY PARANOID TOWN.

IF U R TALKING ABOUT PORKENS, PORKENS ALSO WANTED IRCHER BEFORE THAT. SO THEY WANT IRCHER THEN ENCHANT/HERTA. NOT A GOOD LOOK.

In post 190, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 188, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I really don’t think this is town!Titus here.

YOU AGREE WITH TITUS, VANDER, PORKENS POE?

In post 229, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:I'M STARTING TO COME AROUND TO SCUM TITUS

In post 237, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 236, Vanderscamp wrote:The above meaning that I would rather flip a lurkerish null than Titus but not more than Ircher.

I like Don and bear, and mild town on furtive.

FOCUS ON FIRE PREVENTION.

VOTE: TITUS

In post 302, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:TITUS ARE YOU THE ARSONIST?

In post 344, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:VOTE: TITUS

This actually looks more suspicious. He goes from Vanderscamp/Porkens then to suspecting Titus for no reason really in a handful of posts. Then he builds up to say that Titus's push on Draper was scummy and then votes Titus. All the while keeping Porkens in his POE. And somewhere along the line he loses Vanderscamp as a suspect and never says why. I mean it's okay to scum read more than two people. What happened to Vanderscamp? It seems that only someone who is informed would just indiscriminately swap out scum reads like that.

In post 237, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:

In post 236, Vanderscamp wrote:The above meaning that I would rather flip a lurkerish null than Titus but not more than Ircher.

I like Don and bear, and mild town on furtive.

FOCUS ON FIRE PREVENTION.

VOTE: TITUS

I don't understand what Vanderscamp is saying and what scrrdbear is doing here.

In post 408, Herta wrote:This actually looks more suspicious.

More suspicious than Ircher, to clarify.

In post 407, furtiveglance wrote:Retract sus on Herta, was never feeling it

Convenient

In post 411, Porkens wrote:

In post 407, furtiveglance wrote:Retract sus on Herta, was never feeling it

Convenient

Says the player voteparked on a vanity wagon that no one but you is currently interested in flipping. I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to. I just thought having us, furtive and Enchant as possible Ircher buddies seemed kind’ve whack because neither are anywhere near my PoE.

I will take another look at Scerrredbear and confer with Auro but I’m still not trusting Titus. She just sounds too certain about things and she usually doesn’t d1 without flips. @furtive, you remember how she seemed to not be extremely certain on pretty much anything in Chromavalon d1?

~Nancy

FIRE IS RUTHLESS, BE SAFE.

In post 412, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I will take another look at Scerrredbear and confer with Auro but I’m still not trusting Titus. She just sounds too certain about things and she usually doesn’t d1 without flips. @furtive, you remember how she seemed to not be extremely certain on pretty much anything in Chromavalon d1?

YOU CAN TAKE ANOTHER LOOK IF YOU WANT, YOU WERE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME THOUGH. I WANT TITUS TO BE ELIMINATED. I HAVE LITTLE IDEA WHO THE OTHER ARSONIST IS, BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S YOU OR ENCHANT.

Although I still feel frustrated that Nancy isn't engaging me specifically, she does seem to be engaging the thread more as a whole. The wagon stagnation suggests that we're split and finding it impossible to coordinate. While I still don't like Nancy's play, I have to factor in group dynamics.

In post 412, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to.

Herta, if I am correct, knows Ircher is town. Therefore, he came up with flimsy reasons to townread Ircher. The lack of viable suspects/partners is a load of hogwash, particularly his confidence that scum never put their partners at top or bottom. That's stronger than my rule of 3 confidence.

Fine VOTE: unvote reads list incomming

I'd like if everyone answered a question: Do you think any bus votes have happened on any wagon excluding mine? (I know I'm town so I know mine can't be bussing.)

In post 415, Titus wrote:

In post 412, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to.

Herta, if I am correct, knows Ircher is town. Therefore, he came up with flimsy reasons to townread Ircher. The lack of viable suspects/partners is a load of hogwash, particularly his confidence that scum never put their partners at top or bottom. That's stronger than my rule of 3 confidence.

With just two scum? Nah I don't think they do that.

But I don't think you care.

In post 412, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 411, Porkens wrote:

In post 407, furtiveglance wrote:Retract sus on Herta, was never feeling it

Convenient

Says the player voteparked on a vanity wagon that no one but you is currently interested in flipping. I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to. I just thought having us, furtive and Enchant as possible Ircher buddies seemed kind’ve whack because neither are anywhere near my PoE.

I will take another look at Scerrredbear and confer with Auro but I’m still not trusting Titus. She just sounds too certain about things and she usually doesn’t d1 without flips. @furtive, you remember how she seemed to not be extremely certain on pretty much anything in Chromavalon d1?

~Nancy

Yeah I'll have a look at that game

In post 411, Porkens wrote:

In post 407, furtiveglance wrote:Retract sus on Herta, was never feeling it

Convenient

When are you going to post reads?

In post 415, Titus wrote:

In post 412, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to.

Herta, if I am correct, knows Ircher is town. Therefore, he came up with flimsy reasons to townread Ircher. The lack of viable suspects/partners is a load of hogwash, particularly his confidence that scum never put their partners at top or bottom. That's stronger than my rule of 3 confidence.

That still seems like a stretch to call that tmi...

In post 416, Porkens wrote:Fine VOTE: unvote reads list incomming

It better be here before today is over.

In post 417, Titus wrote:I'd like if everyone answered a question: Do you think any bus votes have happened on any wagon excluding mine? (I know I'm town so I know mine can't be bussing.)

It's too early to tell. (Also, I'm too lazy to check even if it was not too early.)

FOR SOME REASON I THINK FURTIVE IS TITUS' PARTNER

I STILL WANT TO ELIMINATE TITUS

In post 412, Don Draper x Mistress wrote:

In post 411, Porkens wrote:

In post 407, furtiveglance wrote:Retract sus on Herta, was never feeling it

Convenient

Says the player voteparked on a vanity wagon that no one but you is currently interested in flipping. I still don’t see the so-called “tmi” that Titus was alluding to. I just thought having us, furtive and Enchant as possible Ircher buddies seemed kind’ve whack because neither are anywhere near my PoE.

I will take another look at Scerrredbear and confer with Auro but I’m still not trusting Titus. She just sounds too certain about things and she usually doesn’t d1 without flips. @furtive, you remember how she seemed to not be extremely certain on pretty much anything in Chromavalon d1?

~Nancy

CAN YOU ASK AURO IF FURTIVE TRIPPED HIS FIRE SAFETY WIRES YET

BECAUSE FURTIVE TRIPPED MINE

crunch

of dry leaves under your feet