It is, but then you said there wasn't one?In post 4022, Kagami wrote:You're saying gif told you people wouldn't know if they have stuff to steal. GCBC says that gif has told him he has nothing to steal. <- I believe this is the contradiction you were pointing out.
Your item is relevant to your role. We don't steal items relevant to role, we steal items relevant to flavor that the player is unaware of.In post 4023, bubbajack8 wrote:Uh I got a response from Gif saying my item can't be stolen so you're full of BS.
There isn't one, because yukari told me clearly that if I had asked if a specific item can be stolen from me, she would answer. This confirms any reasonable interpretation of GCBC's statement.In post 4025, Messiah Complex wrote:It is, but then you said there wasn't one?In post 4022, Kagami wrote:You're saying gif told you people wouldn't know if they have stuff to steal. GCBC says that gif has told him he has nothing to steal. <- I believe this is the contradiction you were pointing out.
- Des
No, GCBC stated that the mod confirmed they don't have any item to steal at all. How would you specifically ask if an item can be stolen if you don't know it exists?In post 4027, Kagami wrote:There isn't one, because yukari told me clearly that if I had asked if a specific item can be stolen from me, she would answer. This confirms any reasonable interpretation of GCBC's statement.
Sooo why didn't you clarify this earlier?In post 4026, Messiah Complex wrote:Your item is relevant to your role. We don't steal items relevant to role, we steal items relevant to flavor that the player is unaware of.In post 4023, bubbajack8 wrote:Uh I got a response from Gif saying my item can't be stolen so you're full of BS.
- Des
Because there was nothing to clarify? Your situation was ambiguous and there was nothing to gain from revealing the information at that time.In post 4032, bubbajack8 wrote: Sooo why didn't you clarify this earlier?
Because there was nothing to clarify? Your situation was ambiguous and there was nothing to gain from revealing the information at that time.In post 4032, bubbajack8 wrote: Sooo why didn't you clarify this earlier?
Go back to voting GCBC guys.In post 3982, Saki wrote:This is a total lie.In post 3977, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Saki is probably scum, if not groupscum, then here lies the probably serial killer. His play has been incredibly lazy and distractin a la FEA. If you are by some miracle town, Saki, then you need to play less like Saki and mroe like Nsin. And quickly.
Read my play in FEA and compare it to say, Xenogears or LOTR.
And you have proof of this elsewhere?In post 4037, Saki wrote:Go back to voting GCBC guys.In post 3982, Saki wrote:This is a total lie.In post 3977, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Saki is probably scum, if not groupscum, then here lies the probably serial killer. His play has been incredibly lazy and distractin a la FEA. If you are by some miracle town, Saki, then you need to play less like Saki and mroe like Nsin. And quickly.
Read my play in FEA and compare it to say, Xenogears or LOTR.
Mislynching based off of faulty meta is Cabd's specialty.
In post 4039, bubbajack8 wrote:And you have proof of this elsewhere?In post 4037, Saki wrote:Go back to voting GCBC guys.In post 3982, Saki wrote:This is a total lie.In post 3977, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Saki is probably scum, if not groupscum, then here lies the probably serial killer. His play has been incredibly lazy and distractin a la FEA. If you are by some miracle town, Saki, then you need to play less like Saki and mroe like Nsin. And quickly.
Read my play in FEA and compare it to say, Xenogears or LOTR.
Mislynching based off of faulty meta is Cabd's specialty.
By a boy's own words...In post 2622, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Do I find it odd? Absolutely.In post 2615, Varsoon wrote:This. Weren't the kills identical?In post 2612, Jaqen Hghar wrote:GCBC, do you find it odd, as a man does, that Kat should single out Serene the victim of a vigilante vile? Why not Kaze? Why not either/or? Oddly specific a man thinks.Did I just finish a scumgame where I used this as a "slip" to push a mislynch on a player? Absolutely.It's hardly a true slip to me, but I will grant you it's worrying somewhat. I'll see what hawkie makes of it on the morrow.
A boy uses a player's meta to set up mislynches as scum. It is known. If Patchface is so unwilling to work with town, he can go back under the waves with the starfishes and sea horses to find it for himself (I know, I know, oh, oh, oh!)In post 4041, bubbajack8 wrote:That's not related to a players meta.
-_-In post 4047, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:ActioDan, how many shots do you have left on your ability/how many did you have to begin with
