Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:06 pm
when have i not owned up to pushing a town lynch.
i pushed a lynch on shadow. he flipped town. what of it.
i pushed a lynch on shadow. he flipped town. what of it.
Well for starters, if you were town, I would expect you to be self-aware that you hardcore wagoned a town the previous day and not come out swining right off the bat with a "case" on me (which is p much bullshit and has no ground). You would be more humbled. The fact that you ignore you just pushing a mislynch like that to then pushing a mislynch on me like nothing happened the previous day heavily indicates you're scum who doesn't care about scumhunting, just cares are narrowing down the playerlist.In post 4021, Parama wrote:i mean, shadow was scummy as heck. i'm not going to take responsibility for how scummy he played. why should i?
Well for starters, if you were town, I would expect you to be self-aware that you hardcore wagoned a town the previous day and not come out swining right off the bat with a "case" on me (which is p much bullshit and has no ground). You would be more humbled. The fact that you ignore you just pushing a mislynch like that to then pushing a mislynch on me like nothing happened the previous day heavily indicates you're scum who doesn't care about scumhunting, just cares are narrowing down the playerlist.In post 4021, Parama wrote:i mean, shadow was scummy as heck. i'm not going to take responsibility for how scummy he played. why should i?
In post 4029, Parama wrote:sorry for trying to lynch scum????
yes, i'm not that oblivious. your point please.
admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing itIn post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understandI'm being some what of a hypocritebut your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
Because it doesn't look like you believe in half of what you're saying.In post 4032, Parama wrote:like that doesn't even make sense. i made a case on you because i think you're scum. how is that in any way scummy to do.
????????????In post 4035, Parama wrote:admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing itIn post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understandI'm being some what of a hypocritebut your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
it's literally all stuff i've already saidIn post 4036, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Because it doesn't look like you believe in half of what you're saying.In post 4032, Parama wrote:like that doesn't even make sense. i made a case on you because i think you're scum. how is that in any way scummy to do.
The case has no basis. It looks like it's put together more to push a mislynch than it is to try and scumhunt.
you can't admit that you're doing something hypocritical and then just dismiss it by acknowledging it. you still did it either way.In post 4037, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:????????????In post 4035, Parama wrote:admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing itIn post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understandI'm being some what of a hypocritebut your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
Is your next part of the case gonna be "SAD is a hypocrite - lynch all hypocrites".
Wtf is your point.
I'm not dismissing it... I'm admitting it.In post 4040, Parama wrote:you can't admit that you're doing something hypocritical and then just dismiss it by acknowledging it. you still did it either way.In post 4037, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:????????????In post 4035, Parama wrote:admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing itIn post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understandI'm being some what of a hypocritebut your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
Is your next part of the case gonna be "SAD is a hypocrite - lynch all hypocrites".
Wtf is your point.
your read on me changed for reasons that had... nothing to do with the interaction between mhsmith and me. so I don't see how you actually looked at what had happened between me and mhsmith and factored it in here. care to refute everything else I wrote about my read progression (namely the fact that I had compelling reason to back off and the fact that you're scum reading, or at least OK with compromise lynching, all the same pairs who I want to lynch first)?In post 4026, Dunnstral wrote:You're acting like my read hasn't changed. It has. I townread you yesterday.
I don't think anyone was feigning frustration. Still think there's scum
I don't care that you're voting the same pair, what I care about is the reasoning behind it. as far as I can tell, you have provided no compelling reason to scum read HS, someone who is pretty obviously not scum.In post 4026, Dunnstral wrote:I don't see how you can take issue with me seeing HS as scuma dn voting there when you're saying Parama is scum. It's the same slot? Why should it matter to you
again.In post 4041, Parama wrote:right, arguing with you two is a true waste of my time since i feel like you're both just ignoring me and going "lol scum" instead so i'm gonna go do literally anything else for now
In post 4041, Parama wrote:right, arguing with you two is a true waste of my time since i feel like you're both just ignoring me and going "lol scum"
OK I think I'm going wrong somewhere. have I misread something?In post 4045, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not. I've said it before and I say it again: IF HS flips scum... Kagami is probably scum too