Page 162 of 236

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:06 pm
by Parama
when have i not owned up to pushing a town lynch.

i pushed a lynch on shadow. he flipped town. what of it.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:07 pm
by Dunnstral
I was talking about the read on mhsmith. Your slot.

You're acting like my read hasn't changed. It has. I townread you yesterday.

I don't think anyone was feigning frustration. Still think there's scum


I don't see how you can take issue with me seeing HS as scuma dn voting there when you're saying Parama is scum. It's the same slot? Why should it matter to you

I'm not complaining about anything. I'm calling you guys out on something scummy. Note that I'm still voting HS-Parama

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:08 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4021, Parama wrote:i mean, shadow was scummy as heck. i'm not going to take responsibility for how scummy he played. why should i?
Well for starters, if you were town, I would expect you to be self-aware that you hardcore wagoned a town the previous day and not come out swining right off the bat with a "case" on me (which is p much bullshit and has no ground). You would be more humbled. The fact that you ignore you just pushing a mislynch like that to then pushing a mislynch on me like nothing happened the previous day heavily indicates you're scum who doesn't care about scumhunting, just cares are narrowing down the playerlist.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:08 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4021, Parama wrote:i mean, shadow was scummy as heck. i'm not going to take responsibility for how scummy he played. why should i?
Well for starters, if you were town, I would expect you to be self-aware that you hardcore wagoned a town the previous day and not come out swining right off the bat with a "case" on me (which is p much bullshit and has no ground). You would be more humbled. The fact that you ignore you just pushing a mislynch like that to then pushing a mislynch on me like nothing happened the previous day heavily indicates you're scum who doesn't care about scumhunting, just cares are narrowing down the playerlist.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:09 pm
by Parama
sorry for trying to lynch scum????

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:10 pm
by Dunnstral
Want to know why they call me funnstral

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:10 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4029, Parama wrote:sorry for trying to lynch scum????
In post 3770, FakeGod wrote:
Shadow_step, who was
Town
Gentleman
, has
left
in
first dance
.

MariaR, who was
Town
Lady
, has
left
in
first dance
.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:11 pm
by Parama
like that doesn't even make sense. i made a case on you because i think you're scum. how is that in any way scummy to do.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:11 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
(Like I understand I'm being some what of a hypocrite but your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:11 pm
by Parama
In post 4031, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 4029, Parama wrote:sorry for trying to lynch scum????
In post 3770, FakeGod wrote:
Shadow_step, who was
Town
Gentleman
, has
left
in
first dance
.

MariaR, who was
Town
Lady
, has
left
in
first dance
.
yes, i'm not that oblivious. your point please.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:12 pm
by Parama
In post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understand
I'm being some what of a hypocrite
but your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing it

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:12 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4032, Parama wrote:like that doesn't even make sense. i made a case on you because i think you're scum. how is that in any way scummy to do.
Because it doesn't look like you believe in half of what you're saying.

The case has no basis. It looks like it's put together more to push a mislynch than it is to try and scumhunt.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:13 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4035, Parama wrote:
In post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understand
I'm being some what of a hypocrite
but your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing it
????????????

Is your next part of the case gonna be "SAD is a hypocrite - lynch all hypocrites".

Wtf is your point.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:14 pm
by Parama
In post 4036, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 4032, Parama wrote:like that doesn't even make sense. i made a case on you because i think you're scum. how is that in any way scummy to do.
Because it doesn't look like you believe in half of what you're saying.

The case has no basis. It looks like it's put together more to push a mislynch than it is to try and scumhunt.
it's literally all stuff i've already said

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:15 pm
by pieguyn
I agree that Parama's "case" on SAD is really shallow, in the same way that their S_S push was. it was bad D1 and it's bad now.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:15 pm
by Parama
In post 4037, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 4035, Parama wrote:
In post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understand
I'm being some what of a hypocrite
but your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing it
????????????

Is your next part of the case gonna be "SAD is a hypocrite - lynch all hypocrites".

Wtf is your point.
you can't admit that you're doing something hypocritical and then just dismiss it by acknowledging it. you still did it either way.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:16 pm
by Parama
right, arguing with you two is a true waste of my time since i feel like you're both just ignoring me and going "lol scum" instead so i'm gonna go do literally anything else for now

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:17 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4040, Parama wrote:
In post 4037, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 4035, Parama wrote:
In post 4033, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:(Like I understand
I'm being some what of a hypocrite
but your mindset/thought process is NOT coming from town).
admitting to something doesn't absolve you from doing it
????????????

Is your next part of the case gonna be "SAD is a hypocrite - lynch all hypocrites".

Wtf is your point.
you can't admit that you're doing something hypocritical and then just dismiss it by acknowledging it. you still did it either way.
I'm not dismissing it... I'm admitting it.

I'm saying we both pushed Shadow, yes. We BOTH were reasons he got mislynched - yes. The difference is the mindset we have after the lynch.

Again, what's your point?

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:18 pm
by pieguyn
In post 4026, Dunnstral wrote:You're acting like my read hasn't changed. It has. I townread you yesterday.

I don't think anyone was feigning frustration. Still think there's scum
your read on me changed for reasons that had... nothing to do with the interaction between mhsmith and me. so I don't see how you actually looked at what had happened between me and mhsmith and factored it in here. care to refute everything else I wrote about my read progression (namely the fact that I had compelling reason to back off and the fact that you're scum reading, or at least OK with compromise lynching, all the same pairs who I want to lynch first)?
In post 4026, Dunnstral wrote:I don't see how you can take issue with me seeing HS as scuma dn voting there when you're saying Parama is scum. It's the same slot? Why should it matter to you
I don't care that you're voting the same pair, what I care about is the reasoning behind it. as far as I can tell, you have provided no compelling reason to scum read HS, someone who is pretty obviously not scum.

positionally, it's also relevant because you're trying to set Parama's pair and my pair up as a pair so that if the former flips scum people think we're aligned, so I'm not going to let you just say this.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:19 pm
by pieguyn
In post 4041, Parama wrote:right, arguing with you two is a true waste of my time since i feel like you're both just ignoring me and going "lol scum" instead so i'm gonna go do literally anything else for now
again.

if you want me to go through your posts about SAD and explain why it doesn't hold water and why specifically I don't think it looks like you having a natural thought process as town, blow the whistle. I'm not ignoring you and going "lol scum", as much as you want to make it sound like I am. ~

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:21 pm
by Dunnstral
I'm not. I've said it before and I say it again: IF HS flips scum... Kagami is probably scum too

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:25 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
In post 4041, Parama wrote:right, arguing with you two is a true waste of my time since i feel like you're both just ignoring me and going "lol scum"
:neutral:

You're not engaging me, or asking me questions, or anything.

What do you want me to say. "Yeah gee Parama, that case is super convincing, I'm sold!" ???

Like you literally just made BS up and then when I try to engage with you or talk to you you pretend you're angry or something? This is exactly why I'm saying you look like you want to push another mislynch - you try to put the case to convince OTHER people, instead of trying to engage with me to convince YOURSELF. It's like you already know I'm town, so you go "Why bother talking with him when I can try to get other people to wagon him".

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:26 pm
by pieguyn
In post 4045, Dunnstral wrote:I'm not. I've said it before and I say it again: IF HS flips scum... Kagami is probably scum too
OK I think I'm going wrong somewhere. have I misread something?

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 4:50 pm
by Dunnstral
I said this day 1 and I began to think it again overnight.

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 4:51 pm
by Dunnstral
As a pretty decent possibility at the very least