Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2022 2:46 pm
That moment when I FoS myself lol
Nope. My gut says it's because you know April's town. Like why would you jump to him being tilted? Second, professor style tones are rarely tilted. If April was tilted, I'd expect more contempt from the words he's typing.In post 4023, Yeet wrote:What is wrong with my statement? Are you just saying this because you are a very facts and logic based player?In post 4020, Titus wrote:YuckIn post 4019, Yeet wrote:Sounds like you are tilted that you think I am playing “objectively worse” than you because I don’t write tons of logic and switch a lot, yet you’re the one getting wagoned
Yeah it's potentially a LAMIST statement to make with a built in excuse to not share thoughts.
Can you explain why your analysis is implicating Datisi and fua?In post 4024, Titus wrote:Using a quick view of the VCs, I would look at Datisi and fua closer. Not superb reasoning but developing reads on those two would give reads on the whole.
My current theory is that scum were sheeping people to punish controversy and just placing easy votes. While it's possible, it's rare for scum to be aggressive when they don't need to be.
Math's prior poster likely provoked a scum vote or two not because of his opinions but what he was saying. Such callousness would make me want to vote him out if he wasn't a mason.
I'm actually surprised that she read page 1.
Ooh fresh meat.In post 4027, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah it's potentially a LAMIST statement to make with a built in excuse to not share thoughts.
I think luminary suggested the first 60 pages and then skipping to when April becomes active which I'd like because Titus' slot is one I really need to sort.
An alternative approach, not really reading at all and providing fresh reads as they come, could be helpful for scum hunting but would be more difficult for us to read Titus' slot itself.
They're major wagons at various gamestates. Knowing the options scum have suggests where they might want to be on the wagon.In post 4028, Frogsterking wrote:Can you explain why your analysis is implicating Datisi and fua?In post 4024, Titus wrote:Using a quick view of the VCs, I would look at Datisi and fua closer. Not superb reasoning but developing reads on those two would give reads on the whole.
My current theory is that scum were sheeping people to punish controversy and just placing easy votes. While it's possible, it's rare for scum to be aggressive when they don't need to be.
Math's prior poster likely provoked a scum vote or two not because of his opinions but what he was saying. Such callousness would make me want to vote him out if he wasn't a mason.
Also does your method of VCA become more helpful the more slots are flipped?
Sure. One of them is a MASON, and one is a CLAIMED VIG. I like April out of the other 3, and the remaining 2 haven't posted anything meaningful yet.
I didn't get a staunch read either way yet. Why?In post 4032, Nero Cain wrote:scum do post during RVS so it's possible to find scum during "RVS"
can we kill VP now?
Wait what? I never claimed vig.In post 4033, Eyes without a face wrote:one is a CLAIMED VIG
In post 4031, Titus wrote:assuming Math is a mason
its Math...In post 4031, Titus wrote:then why would scum shoot monkey over Math?
So you read him? If so why did you not talk about him. If your post wasn't about VP then I have no clue what you are on about.In post 4034, Titus wrote:I didn't get a staunch read either way yet. Why?
Enchant is the claimed vig. Previously fuaIn post 4035, Titus wrote:Wait what? I never claimed vig.In post 4033, Eyes without a face wrote:one is a CLAIMED VIG
Enchant is the claimed vig (well Enchant slt is, since it was fua who claimed it on D1)In post 4035, Titus wrote:Wait what? I never claimed vig.In post 4033, Eyes without a face wrote:one is a CLAIMED VIG
I'm worried shinier topics are going to distract from the VP wagon.In post 4032, Nero Cain wrote:scum do post during RVS so it's possible to find scum during "RVS"
can we kill VP now?
This post is fair because I wasn't asking any questions in 4029 so Titus is like mirroring me which makes me think town a little bit (or a deliberate pocketing attempt.)In post 4030, Titus wrote:Ooh fresh meat.In post 4027, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah it's potentially a LAMIST statement to make with a built in excuse to not share thoughts.
I think luminary suggested the first 60 pages and then skipping to when April becomes active which I'd like because Titus' slot is one I really need to sort.
An alternative approach, not really reading at all and providing fresh reads as they come, could be helpful for scum hunting but would be more difficult for us to read Titus' slot itself.
I'm not an easy player to read. I just think differently. I feel I'm pretty transparent but I'm the only one who feels this way.
I try to read people by what they do as opposed to what they say. I care more about why than the what. So early pregame RVS generally makes my eyes bleed. Occasionally I do try, but that try is legit NAI.
Okay so you think Datisi and fua seem scummy because they were viable mislim targets who weren't being pushed very much?In post 4031, Titus wrote:They're major wagons at various gamestates. Knowing the options scum have suggests where they might want to be on the wagon.In post 4028, Frogsterking wrote:Can you explain why your analysis is implicating Datisi and fua?In post 4024, Titus wrote:Using a quick view of the VCs, I would look at Datisi and fua closer. Not superb reasoning but developing reads on those two would give reads on the whole.
My current theory is that scum were sheeping people to punish controversy and just placing easy votes. While it's possible, it's rare for scum to be aggressive when they don't need to be.
Math's prior poster likely provoked a scum vote or two not because of his opinions but what he was saying. Such callousness would make me want to vote him out if he wasn't a mason.
Also does your method of VCA become more helpful the more slots are flipped?
Absolutely yes. I'm using it now to just get feet wet. The more we know about options, the more we can tell about an agenda.
For instance, assuming Math is a mason, then why would scum shoot monkey over Math? What does that say? Votes can and do tell a similar story.
Scum tearsIn post 4040, Frogsterking wrote:I'm worried shinier topics are going to distract from the VP wagon.
What do you mean by vanity wagon?In post 4040, Frogsterking wrote:HEM was pretty vocal about sortng Yeet and even joined my vanity wagon for a little while
I felt like I was the only one voting for Yeet most of the day. I think I was the only voter when HEM joined me.In post 4042, VP Baltar wrote:What do you mean by vanity wagon?In post 4040, Frogsterking wrote:HEM was pretty vocal about sortng Yeet and even joined my vanity wagon for a little while
Aren't these two sentences opposites?In post 4030, Titus wrote:I try to read people by what they do as opposed to what they say. I care more about why than the what.
oh shiny.....In post 4040, Frogsterking wrote:I'm worried shinier topics are going to distract from the VP wagon.
Probably because Math gunked up the game for 30 pages and made a lot of players not want to listen to him.In post 4031, Titus wrote:For instance, assuming Math is a mason, then why would scum shoot monkey over Math?
I was referring to Malcolm in that post.In post 4026, Titus wrote:Nope. My gut says it's because you know April's town. Like why would you jump to him being tilted? Second, professor style tones are rarely tilted. If April was tilted, I'd expect more contempt from the words he's typing.In post 4023, Yeet wrote:What is wrong with my statement? Are you just saying this because you are a very facts and logic based player?In post 4020, Titus wrote:YuckIn post 4019, Yeet wrote:Sounds like you are tilted that you think I am playing “objectively worse” than you because I don’t write tons of logic and switch a lot, yet you’re the one getting wagoned