Mafiascum.net

Lord Mhork wrote:Townies don't care about that though.

i think you'll find you're wrong.

Lord Mhork wrote:Also it's very interesting that you felt like you needed to remove ambiguity. Why?

because i wanted to make my meaning clear

Lord Mhork wrote:How were my interjections annoying? Also who the fuck are you to tell me to shut up?

They just were. Asking me why I wasn't voting Nero Cain in particular was strangely infuriating.

Can you calm down? I didn't tell you to shut up once. I asked you to please stop playing the role of the peacemaker because there are legit points against BBmolla and he's defending by trying to stir shit.

Lord Mhork wrote:I don't care. Revelations are sketch as all hell, especially when you start pushing them like you know they are 100% correct. Most 180s have at least a shadow of doubt.

don't generalise. i can think of two other occasions off the top of my head where i have had revelations that felt exactly like my one about bbmolla did.

In post 4049, Lord Mhork wrote:Most 180s have at least a shadow of doubt.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Which is the problem. He's not showing it, and despite his "BB'S OBVIOUS SCUM" attitude he won't 1v1 me.

You're fucking argument is weak and baseless, and I've fucking called you on it only for you to be like "Oh whatever, YOU go look for your meta."

You're full of shit Quilford. 100%.

FUck contractions.

bbMolla wrote:Bullshit isn't hard to make up dude. I could have reads on everyone as scum. I'm town, and because of that, I don't have shit.

right. the fact that you "don't have shit" is the part i find hard to swallow bbM. like, part of the reason i eventually started town reading you in n's game is because the stuff you were saying matched my thought processes and looked genuine, and all you're doing here is coasting and claiming you wouldn't do this as scum so you can't be scum here

baldy wrote:I bring a case against Molla. Doesn't get interested.
Quilford makes a summary of my case. Molla is suddenly so interested and wants a 1v1.

i doubt it

BBmolla wrote:You're fucking argument is weak and baseless, and I've fucking called you on it only for you to be like "Oh whatever, YOU go look for your meta."

You're full of shit Quilford. 100%.

what's weak and baseless about

posting elsewhere
no conviction
no scumhunting
no attempts to engage
not his town meta

the only thing you've taken issue with is that last point.

i doubt that's bussing*

Hey I have a read now, I think Quilford/N is scum.

The fuck does conviction mean

Town meta shows me having difficulty to scumhunt in games like this, covered that

Attempts to engage is a stupid point

If your case is so indestructable why won't you agree to 1v1 me

bbMolla wrote:I have a read now

*clap* *clap*

UNVOTE:
VOTE: upside down

bbmolla

up until now, when you finally got an excuse to show off that you can fake emotions as scum

all your posting was aimless fluffy bullcrap done just to live another day.

Kid, I'm probably dying today, hencewhy I'm trying to 1v1 you

And trust me, there are enough people who know I'm town here who will make sure the 1v1 follows through tomorrow and won't let you back out.

In post 4061, Quilford wrote:up until now, when you finally got an excuse to show off that you can fake emotions as scum

all your posting was aimless fluffy bullcrap done just to live another day.

hey bbMolla,

In post 3994, BBmolla wrote:Quil you wanna 1v1 me?

you started thinking ud was scum here?

or why did you ask for the 1v1?

i don't see how what we've been doing so far is not 1v1ing. it just doesn't have that label affixed to it to show that you've been doing something other than splashing about like an angry magikarp

i'll humour you. i agree to your 1v1. now what?

In post 4064, Garuda wrote:

In post 4061, Quilford wrote:up until now, when you finally got an excuse to show off that you can fake emotions as scum

all your posting was aimless fluffy bullcrap done just to live another day.

:neutral:

VOTE: upside down

The first time you called Molla scum...okay. Given the size of his wagon, it was convenient, but I could buy that. It's only recently that I've come around to Townmolla, after all.

The second, third, and fourth times you just insisted he was obvscum when he was at just vaguely playing like lurker scum (at least if your gut isn't sensitive to Molla town), that started to strain credulity. But fine. Some people aren't very good at Mafia.

But when Molla started towntelling through every orifice of his body, and outright PROVED your meta charge was bullshit (incidentally, I know for a fact his self-assessment is accurate--he's done the case-walling thing as scum in an attempt to gain town cred in a game on Westeros)...and then you just brushed it aside as though you pulled the "scum meta" thing completely out of your ass and just repeated over and over again that he was obvscum...

Everything you've said is posturing and repeating the same bullshit list of bullet points you could probably concoct about any low poster. I don't see any reflection or attempt to discern Molla's alignment. I think he's got you pegged.

Please. I'm begging you. For the love of God, explain WHY this is his scum meta without any cute coy evasions, why you think his play is THIS out of the ordinary, and how the fuck does his angry reaction to you and obviously genuine paranoia even make any sense as scum? He didn't react like this to any of the other people who suspect him. Isn't this the point where, if you were town, you'd be going, "Well, gee, my vote on a random lurky not-very-constructive player probably DIDN'T hit the mark" rather than desperately clinging to your opinion?

It's amazing. Somehow, in one evening of posted, you've managed to singlehandedly torpedo my town read on this slot. This is an impressive of scumminess.

Well, I guess that's why N was doing all the posting!

Preview-edit: Molla, although I agree with your read, 1v1s are stupid because town tunnel on town and are wrong all the time. They're only good for reaction tests.

In post 4062, BBmolla wrote:Kid, I'm probably dying today, hencewhy I'm trying to 1v1 you

Eh. Do you believe this? Truly? There really wasn't any momentum against you, even with upside down's vote.

wow mina

- incredibly patronising
- what are you getting at in your first two paragraphs? what is the importance of the 'first... second, third, fourth' times? you are aware this all happened in the space of a few hours, right?
- fighting meta assessments without evidence with meta assessments without evidence
- misreading my posts (i think bb's not playing to his town meta, not that he's playing to his scum meta (i can't remember the last time i saw molla scum)... and no, one doesn't imply the other)
- did i say 'obvscum' in a way that implied it was obvious to everyone once?
- 'He didn't react like this to any of the other people who suspect him.' so what? how does anything in the next sentences from this follow????
- giant douchebaggery. n was doing all the posting because i was on LA

why are you defending bbmolla so hard?

In post 3981, Magua wrote:Nero Cain (4): Lord Mhork, Garuda, zMuffinMan, VoidedMafia
BBmolla (4): Ghostly Penguin, Harakiri, 1baldeagle1, uʍop ǝpısdn

@mina

In post 4065, zMuffinMan wrote:hey bbMolla,

In post 3994, BBmolla wrote:Quil you wanna 1v1 me?

you started thinking ud was scum here?

or why did you ask for the 1v1?

Yeah, admittedly I wasn't 100% but I thought it'd be cool to see where it went.

Do I honestly think I'm getting lynched today? Not particularly. But if it swings my way, then I'd like to have my lynch not be in complete vain.

Still don't think Quilford is scum.

Still think Nero lynch continues to look pretty great.