This is turning out to be the biggest scum failing
Can mass quote PMs to search for problems like that?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:42 am
by AKnottedRope
I do, apparently.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:44 am
by vezokpiraka
Because you are scum. With a botched fake claim.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:44 am
by vezokpiraka
Also can you please post your PM before getting unsealed?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:45 am
by mothrax
AKR if you had read the sage qt upon replacing in you would have seen the mods confirm that error which is why earlier I said that there was a modconfirmed error in my pm.
@lady: mine as in it rightfully belongs to me, not as in I have it.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:47 am
by AKnottedRope
Um, no. And now I'm holding less faith in finding errors in role PMs...
Remember, I unsealed as a sage and got an entirely new PM. I'm thinking Reck copied and pasted parts of my old PM into a new one with a different passive ability and sent it to me, but didn't proofread it.
And my other PM is in this thread already IIRC, but I'll post it again to be sure.
Reckamonic wrote:You're replacing Hinduragi.
---
Oh, didn't see that mothrax. UNVOTE:
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:49 am
by vezokpiraka
Ok. You may be right there.
Let me check something.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:55 am
by vezokpiraka
Oh. You are right.
@DGB: Can you help us here?
Do the scums get a fake role PM with name flavor and everything there? Or can you tell us what they get?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:11 am
by DTMaster
1. Hold on. I checked with Chrono and Substrike (as a Fake PM it would match the same format of the PMs posted. Or it should). The conclusion is that if DGB is that role, we have three cops. A Poe cop. A Boss cop. And a FLAVOUR COP to the targets and/or sages.
Since the sages need to release their medallians, maybe DGB acts as a cop to find the Sage Targets? Hmmmmmmm.... No you're right I would like to hear this list.
2. Also I don't understand why: "You're Impa" is doubled. Considering how Aikage's and Substrike's PMs went, we'd assume that the flavour part was mod provided. So if we assume the PM is mod provided, I'd think the flavour shouldn't have any errors to it. There's no reason to change that from a scum POV. This is the same argument that both Nikanor and Ythan presented (i.e. Since we can quote our PMs in thread, and that flavour analysis would be wrong since mods would provide flavour based on that). Cutting out the strike out error, the extra dot and the double Impas suggest altered PMs.
The double dot makes sense from scum to alter, since it's part of the ability list. The flavour doesn't. PM analysis is producing conflicting results to what we initally assumed. :s.
3. I'm going to scratch my head. It's a good time to reread DGB.
I really hoped that PM analysis could have been applied here but if there's too many holes in it, we need to go back to regular scum hunting.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:08 am
by Katsuki
DrippingGoofball wrote:
This part confuses me. Wasn't substrike's fakeclaim Rauru?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:27 am
by Ythan
Le Cupcake wrote:I'm ready for D6.
The flips tonight imo will be particularly meaningful. We should be able to determine the rest of the scum through PoE tomorrow.
worst
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:28 am
by Ythan
Le Cupcake wrote:Dumb it down a bit, I feel dim
at the moment
.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:30 am
by Ythan
Someone explain a DGB case that doesn't involve her role PM when we have decided ed that there are mod-provided fakeclaims.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:31 am
by Ythan
I am willing to hold onto the "she may have deleted a line of text" thing but there has been significant tunneling on her and it definitely didn't all come from that extra period.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:32 am
by Ythan
mothrax wrote:Other scum faction than DGBscum. not that difficult to infer if you read it in context...
Doesn't look that way to me.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:33 am
by Ythan
AKnottedRope wrote:I have no flavor knowledge whatsoever. Does a great fairy claim work with a poisoner ability?
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Uh... I'm going to venture at a "no".
WHY? How does a delayed kill (often called poison) not fit? DTM, could you claim the name of the ability without ruining anything?
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:36 am
by DrippingGoofball
Neither Fate nor Bunnylover had medallions.
Vezok had fire medallion.
Ythan I bodyguarded with heavy breadcrumbing the day before.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:37 am
by DrippingGoofball
Ythan wrote:I am willing to hold onto the "she may have deleted a line of text" thing but there has been significant tunneling on her and it definitely didn't all come from that extra period.
The tunneling comes from the scumbags that messed with the frog, and killed Beefster. That's who is tunneling. They don't want their gambit to fail.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:37 am
by DrippingGoofball
Albert B. Rampage wrote:*waves at DGB*
Heyyy! Glad to see you're still in the game
And it's party time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:44 am
by DrippingGoofball
I apologize for my bad behavior yesterday. Mothrax is town. He posted him role PM unprompted.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:46 am
by Ythan
DrippingGoofball wrote:Is there any danger in revealing some player's medallions from my investigations?
I have no idea what they mean.
If it's yes/no it tells you who is a sage. If it tells you a specific medallion then it tells you which sage.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 9:47 am
by Ythan
mothrax wrote:If I am correct, medallions are held by the bosses. Since I don't have one and I am unsealed. Though if it was an unsealed sage they would have the medallion?
Ah! Medallions could be held by adult bosses. I don't remember, do they have the medallions before you beat them or do the sages give them to you?