Mafiascum.net

'Everything you've said is posturing and repeating the same bullshit list of bullet points you could probably concoct about any low poster. I don't see any reflection or attempt to discern Molla's alignment. I think he's got you pegged.'

this is such bullshit.

'posturing'?

'concoct about any low poster'? (love the 'probably')

'reflection'?

In post 4066, Quilford wrote:i'll humour you. i agree to your 1v1. now what?

I'd self vote, but mina would yell at me.

Is Mina scum too now? LOL

In post 4025, Harakiri wrote:So the thing I'm getting from this skim is baldeagle was scum. Garuda too prob, I dunno. And Molla, but I'm annoyed both LB and Garuda think he's town, so he's probably town.

I'm a lot less sure of Mhork than I was earlier, but I agree with him that your reads suck. (Well, I think baldeagle has a very real chance of being scum, but how would you be getting this from his really recent posts?

Also, WTF? You think Molla is probably scum. And you're annoyed that two people, one of whom is your OTHER scum read, is townreading. So...that makes Molla probably town? I don't follow.

BBmolla wrote:Is Mina scum too now? LOL

frankly i'm awed at the breathtaking conceit she just showed

whatever. i thought the points against bbmolla spoke for themselves and would've been pretty clear to anyone who did a simple ISO. i'll follow up a little more and try to substantiate them properly once i get time on wednesday and we'll find out whether i actually come to see the light and accept bbmolla as my lord and saviour like apparently mina does

In post 4073, Garuda wrote:Still don't think Quilford is scum.

In post 4074, Garuda wrote:Still think Nero lynch continues to look pretty great.

In post 3956, Nero Cain wrote:Its A reason, not the reason. You need to explain the bolded 'cause I am p sure that you were pushing a Molla lynch at one point. Do you no longer find him scummy?

And I said "One of the main reasons".

My read on BBmolla has nothing to do with why you're not giving BB's and Aces's disconnect any thought or comparison to Mhork's. And FYI, I only used disconnect to townread Aces and no one else.

In post 3999, Garuda wrote:Molla/Quilford 1v1 would be highly entertaining and makes me feel even more vindicated in the Molla townread than I felt before.
Can Quilford keep pace???

Molla's answers don't fill me with confidence, yknow.

In post 3972, Lost Butterfly wrote:Did Magua tell you this at the beginning of the day?

Yes.

In post 4011, Garuda wrote:FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

Let's...not.

If only cuz I'm probably not going to get much out of it <_<.

In post 4024, 1baldeagle1 wrote:What?

MII reference.

In post 4023, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Hmm, I can't help it but I'm thinking that Quilford is bussing BBMollla.

I bring a case against Molla. Doesn't get interested.
Quilford makes a summary of my case. Molla is suddenly so interested and wants a 1v1.

I could buy that.


...Nope, I can't get shit outta that. Goes to show how good I am.

HEY, NERO! SINCE BB IS A WAGON DOES THAT MEAN I GET TO SAY THAT YOU'RE SCUM BECAUSE THERE'S RESISTANCE TO YOUR WAGON NOW?? HUH?? HUH??

I'm in the middle of writing a big post in response to upside down, but...

In post 4082, Voidedmafia wrote:In post 3972, Lost Butterfly wrote:Did Magua tell you this at the beginning of the day?


Yes.

Um...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Um...

Wow.

I'm actually laughing in front of my computer screen right now.

VOTE: Voidedmafia

Well, that was a nice gift! I'll take it, I guess.

With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.

Nero Cain (4): Lord Mhork, Garuda, zMuffinMan, VoidedMafia
BBmolla (4): Ghostly Penguin, Harakiri, 1baldeagle1, uʍop ǝpısdn
uʍop ǝpısdn (3): ProHawk, Espeonage, BBmolla
zMuffinMan (1): Nero Cain
1baldeagle1 (1): pieguyn
VoidedMafia (1): Lost Butterfly

Not Voting (0):

Deadline for Day 5 is Friday, December 6th, at 4:00pm EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:

Hey, guys! Why don't you do a test, and ask Magua if you lose an ability once a second one appears in the game? Including if that ability is extra vote?

Guess what?

Seriously, Voided.

What the fuck? What the fuck???

I mean...were you...

I assume maybe to save it so you could quickhammer in LYLO, but...really. Couldn't you, I don't know, first?

You've gone awfully quiet, Voided.

???

mina whaddaya talking about

In post 4031, Quilford wrote:
vote nero cain when bbmolla is obvious scum fmpov?

This is an awkward statement. Why is it only from your point of view? What does your point of view have anything to do with it?

Quilford, go ask Magua what would happen if you won Extra Vote on N0, and then it went up for auction again on N3 (regardless of whether someone won it a second time).

Hint: not what Voided claimed.

I'm going to ask him a second time just to make sure my question didn't have a loophole in it.

p-edit: ProHawk, you've literally came out with the absolute WORST reason of all the ones given to suspect Quilford. The "fmpov" point is garbage and completely null.

(N3, N4, same difference.)

p-edit: ProHawk, you've literally came out with the absolute WORST reason of all the ones given to suspect Quilford. The "fmpov" point is garbage and completely null.

Also, what's worse is you weren't even the one who came up with it. You're just parroting Mhork's and Garuda's stale talking point.

Dammit. I can't even concentrate on writing a boring wall to Quilford anymore. I'm all giddy!

This is why we should massclaim! Because people always mess things up!

Like, I'd buy him messing up Seanald-style as town...IF he didn't go the extra mile and lie to say Magua had sent him a PM.

LB, its not garbage, what is garbage is the response. I also didn't realize that my post was redundant, as I posted it before reading on.

In post 4038, Quilford wrote:

Lord Mhork wrote:Also I find it rather interesting you note that Nero is scum

from your point of view

. Why did you say that?

i did not say anything of the sort.

UpsideDown knew he what he had said about Molla, and used semantics as a way to skirt the question instead of straight up answer it.

Why didn't you harp on Mhork for asking the same question?

In post 4080, Quilford wrote:whatever. i thought the points against bbmolla spoke for themselves and would've been pretty clear to anyone who did a simple ISO. i'll follow up a little more and try to substantiate them properly once i get time on wednesday and we'll find out whether i actually come to see the light and accept bbmolla as my lord and saviour like apparently mina does

Looking forward to it

In post 4090, ProHawk wrote:

In post 4031, Quilford wrote:
vote nero cain when bbmolla is obvious scum fmpov?

This is an awkward statement. Why is it only from your point of view? What does your point of view have anything to do with it?

it is not awkward and my point of view has everything to do with it because i was specifically asked by lord mhork why i was not voting nero cain. so my point of view was kind of relevant.

ProHawk wrote:

In post 4038, Quilford wrote:

Lord Mhork wrote:Also I find it rather interesting you note that Nero is scum

from your point of view

. Why did you say that?

i did not say anything of the sort.

UpsideDown knew he what he had said about Molla, and used semantics as a way to skirt the question instead of straight up answer it.

no i didn't. i was in the middle of responding to like four different people and i genuinely did not know what he was talking about. also, it's not like it's a question that's hard to answer. i didn't need to skirt it.

mina can you please spell out voided's scumslip or whatever more clearly? tyty

Okay I'm dense as a brick and I understood the slip.