Page 164 of 237
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:19 pm
by Kagami
The track targets are kind of interesting, because they seem (to me) to be looking for a possible SK rather than mafia.
In any case, my feeling is that scum muffinz => town dram => scum GCBC => town muffinz, which is a contradiction, thus town muffinz.
p-edit: Dan said he was motivated, there's no claiming involved.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:21 pm
by Jaqen Hghar
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:21 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 4075, Kagami wrote:p-edit: Dan said he was motivated, there's no claiming involved.
or if I were scum, motivating a partner and claiming to motivate lush
you knew what I was getting at there
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:23 pm
by Kagami
lush said he had an interaction that cleared someone. Obviously this wouldn't be the theft. Both motivates were claimed by their receivers.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:24 pm
by Nachomamma8
you knew what i was getting at kagami
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:24 pm
by Nachomamma8
you knew
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:25 pm
by Kagami
Are you asking for scum motivation for motivating those two rather than a buddy?
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:27 pm
by Nachomamma8
no im asking why i didn't just claim to motivate them instead of dan
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:27 pm
by Nachomamma8
you say I just wanted to throw my motivate away as scum but i didn't have to throw it away on dan, could have targeted Lush and not actually thrown it away
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:30 pm
by Kagami
Sure, you could have done that. I was just curious why you did what you did. I get that you're saying you didn't realize that it would be useless, and I am saying that I find that surprising.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:35 pm
by zMuffinMan
kagami wrote:The track targets are kind of interesting, because they seem (to me) to be looking for a possible SK rather than mafia
i don't know how you got that when i very clearly stated why i tracked who i tracked :/
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:35 pm
by Nachomamma8
i mean if you approach it from the perspective of nacho who isn't flush with time so not as careful as he might be otherwise, with a bunch of limited roles around him he assumes he can motivate or his role is pretty fucking strange and a claimed kill cop who just nailed scum who has one shot left it really isn't that crazy
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:36 pm
by Nachomamma8
and to this day I wonder what the fuck I was supposed to motivate if not limited roles
the doctor???
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:37 pm
by Kagami
fair enough~
Kise would be a good choice, I guess, but whatever
Did you also pick up on lush = cop as jaqen did, or did you just think he was some miscellaneous PR that would be good to motivate?
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:43 pm
by Cabd
I lied nacho. Mara's 21st drinking is starting soon on skypechat.
After that.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:50 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
In post 4071, zMuffinMan wrote:literally just going to ignore kat if she keeps pushing the "dram was VT and a safe track target" angle
@kagami
i made a similar assumption to nacho so i don't see your issue with nacho's thinking
k so I missed out the part where you claimed the track on Dramonic before he claims, alright.
Also take this on why I'm suspecting you: You could be lying about being a tracker
*Gasp*
Hence my suspicion on your actions during the night. I'm not excusing you just because you claimed. You cannot ignore the fact that the role cop pushed for your lynch d2. You may say that Lushdra didn't inspect you but we have no confirmation of this nor any reason to believe you just because you said so. You can get upset with me all you want but the case is right there and I'm entertaining the possibility that I see, and that's with you being a lying scumface!
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:55 pm
by Nachomamma8
i wish i did
i had a gut feeling that they were a PR but probably would have motivated them regardless of that feeling
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:59 pm
by zMuffinMan
i'm not upset with you. if anything, i'll be laughing at you in the dead QT if you manage to get me lynched
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:05 pm
by Messiah Complex
In post 4078, Kagami wrote:lush said he had an interaction that cleared someone.
Obviously this wouldn't be the theft
. Both motivates were claimed by their receivers.
Why obviously? We already mentioned that our target would know about the theft and it could affect them in some way. We made it pretty clear to Lush that we were a PR and wanted to ease their minds on us since they were so torn.
They also said they wouldn't out the person they cleared. How much you wanna bet they were talking about us? Think the fact that we mentioned we were hated for the day could have anything to do with it?
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:18 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
Messiah, I can see your 180 on GCBC.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p5643423
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p5643438
to your wall scumread on 3614.
What happened to your conviction on Muffin.
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:21 pm
by Nachomamma8
i think katarina is town btw
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:22 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
I think ur a butt
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:24 pm
by Nachomamma8
i think you're a butt
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:41 pm
by bubbajack8
Now then can we get back to the game?
Katarina: What do you mean in #4094 Why can you see the 180?
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:30 pm
by Katarina LeBlanc
If you iso'd Messiah Complex and a bulk of his day 2 posts, he starts out in a blaze of glory alongside GCBC with a scumread on Muffin. He brings up himself how obvious the crumb was etc.
Goes into midday where he kinda falls off the game outside of the claim because Kagami takes over the thread with speculation and such.
Then we shift over here where all of a sudden he wants to lynch GCBC despite sharing each other's reads early in the day.
I just want to know when Messiah went from Muffin is confirmed baddie crumbed by Lush (which GCBC forwarded and MC acknowledged was a legitimate read) into his current read now which is basically "shut up GCBC ur scum"