Posted: Sat May 08, 2021 7:21 am
it doesnt make sense for u to think nero is mafia but not xp
good postingIn post 4053, samantha97 wrote:we could just lynch cabd to get a clearer view of day 1
It isn’t Nero just defending T3 though now is it? You can’t minimize my case against Nero as they defended T3, ergo Scum. I have clearly posted a lot of my thoughts on Nero already, and they don’t all revolve around T3. I’m also in the middle of reading so maybe let my thoughts on both develop some more and I’ll get back to you.In post 4075, Rathe wrote:it doesnt make sense for u to think nero is mafia but not xp
There are certain posts in context that are harder for Scum to fake. I think that one is one such post. Scum can talk about their strategy and tactics during games and still be Scum - I get that. But it just felt very natural to me. That’s all.In post 4072, Rathe wrote:i agree that xp is town but not cuz of that that can easily be posted by mafiaIn post 4071, Andresvmb wrote:The main reason I TR XP as I was re-reading was 769. I have a real hard time seeing that kind of post coming from Scum.
I went back to pages 120-121 and yeah you're right, it's not a great look for XP.In post 4075, Rathe wrote:it doesnt make sense for u to think nero is mafia but not xp
this is 1 dimensional.In post 4073, Rathe wrote:again i would like to ask y r scumreading nero for defending t3 n not scumreading xp for it
its not rly the same parameters of defending T3 r thereIn post 4084, WindowsXP wrote:this is 1 dimensional.In post 4073, Rathe wrote:again i would like to ask y r scumreading nero for defending t3 n not scumreading xp for it
except like why do i purposefully stall out multiple wagons? lolIn post 4072, Rathe wrote:i agree that xp is town but not cuz of that that can easily be posted by mafiaIn post 4071, Andresvmb wrote:The main reason I TR XP as I was re-reading was 769. I have a real hard time seeing that kind of post coming from Scum.
also im not saying he should scumread u im saying its not consistent to not do so if it is for neroIn post 4084, WindowsXP wrote:this is 1 dimensional.In post 4073, Rathe wrote:again i would like to ask y r scumreading nero for defending t3 n not scumreading xp for it
In post 4090, Rathe wrote:also im not saying he should scumread u im saying its not consistent to not do so if it is for neroIn post 4084, WindowsXP wrote:this is 1 dimensional.In post 4073, Rathe wrote:again i would like to ask y r scumreading nero for defending t3 n not scumreading xp for it
it makes XP look bad but not andre? but XP is hilariously silly here wrt claiming that I'm scummy for defending t3In post 4083, Marky Mark wrote:I went back to pages 120-121 and yeah you're right, it's not a great look for XP.
there is a difference but it makes u look worseIn post 4089, WindowsXP wrote:im like not in the mood to explain why its different how nero approached t3 and how I did but u do u here.
In post 4089, WindowsXP wrote:nah ur just a bit 1 dimensional as a player and this x action = x alignment across the board.
im like not in the mood to explain why its different how nero approached t3 and how I did but u do u here.
In post 3475, WindowsXP wrote:Look - how does nero reach the conclusion of cabd scum here and say im an acceptable lim in the same breathe.
This is scum trying to force a tvt wagon and its blatant
In post 3485, WindowsXP wrote:You're egging on my wagon while saying cabd is also scum.In post 3482, Nero Cain wrote:y is cabd town? and you can't use "he's spewed b/c u r scum" b/c im not. b/c the t3 wagon overtook him? I don't think that has to make him town.
This is not logical
Am i the only one who sees this or are yall so blinded by tunneling me that its impossible to see basic fucking logic when it slaps you in the face.