Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 8:24 am
LolIn post 4096, skitter30 wrote:i do actually think that this is indicative of scum!ss
LolIn post 4096, skitter30 wrote:i do actually think that this is indicative of scum!ss
Because he was never voting me. Do you disagree that it would 100% be in scum me’s interest not to at least try to save him?In post 4094, Datisi wrote:????In post 4092, Raven Branwen wrote:But if I’m scum here, I’m gamethrowing when you and Skitter wanted to execute Pooky. However your point actually proves my argument because scum!me tries to save dsjstr and brings him to ELO for an easy misexecution.
how is scum!you gamethrowing by pushing town!dsjstr when me and skitter wanted to execute pooky????
no offense but this is a bunch of buzzwords and idk what this actually meansIn post 3966, the worst wrote:Pooky is driving the fuck out of an agenda which I think Raven is pussyfooting around and I feel like SS has just had a considered approach to this phase that's more in line with what I'd be expecting to see coming from town here
if your partner is next in the execution line, yes?In post 4101, Raven Branwen wrote:Because he was never voting me. Do you disagree that it would 100% be in scum me’s interest not to at least try to save him?In post 4094, Datisi wrote:????In post 4092, Raven Branwen wrote:But if I’m scum here, I’m gamethrowing when you and Skitter wanted to execute Pooky. However your point actually proves my argument because scum!me tries to save dsjstr and brings him to ELO for an easy misexecution.
how is scum!you gamethrowing by pushing town!dsjstr when me and skitter wanted to execute pooky????
sighIn post 3968, the worst wrote:in practice like, would I put this much effort into hoping I can successfully pocket you (when I have not succeeded since December 2018), setting up the bg claim (which you'd need to assume I decided to fakeclaim on day one) and intentionally created a gamestate where conftown skitter is trying to hunt myself and my scumbuddy in a gamestate where town!Datisi is still alive?
3947 was just me making a note to myself, not really that important rnIn post 3975, Datisi wrote:skitt I'm not sure what the point of 3947 is? also can you tell me why you're townreading raven off the last few pages or whatnot because i keep getting the opposite feeling :/
i don't, like, actually scumread you but i'm trying to assauge my fears of a deepwolf in you/twIn post 4105, Datisi wrote:no
I honestly don’t understand how you think I’m buddies with Pooky. Did bugs not try to get Pooky hammered?In post 4103, Datisi wrote:if your partner is next in the execution line, yes?In post 4101, Raven Branwen wrote:Because he was never voting me. Do you disagree that it would 100% be in scum me’s interest not to at least try to save him?In post 4094, Datisi wrote:????In post 4092, Raven Branwen wrote:But if I’m scum here, I’m gamethrowing when you and Skitter wanted to execute Pooky. However your point actually proves my argument because scum!me tries to save dsjstr and brings him to ELO for an easy misexecution.
how is scum!you gamethrowing by pushing town!dsjstr when me and skitter wanted to execute pooky????
it's an option i'm considering due to the fact that my previous team fell apart?In post 4111, Raven Branwen wrote:I honestly don’t understand how you think I’m buddies with Pooky. Did bugs not try to get Pooky hammered?
yeah also this.In post 3993, Datisi wrote:because i feel like i'm expected to jump up at a "neighbour with no neighbour" claim and go "me too hey me too!!" and it being mafia-aligned would be... weird??
Isn’t that kind of an insane thing to do if bugs and Pooky are buddies though? How would bugs know that Koba would unvote him unless I’ve completely misread this?In post 4113, Datisi wrote:it's an option i'm considering due to the fact that my previous team fell apart?In post 4111, Raven Branwen wrote:I honestly don’t understand how you think I’m buddies with Pooky. Did bugs not try to get Pooky hammered?
and no? bugs voted pooky to E-1. recently before that pooky was already at E-1 but koba (iirc) had unvoted him recently.
bugs didnt know what the VC was when he voted me, he could've hammered me - do you really think he does this if he's my scumbuddy?In post 4113, Datisi wrote:it's an option i'm considering due to the fact that my previous team fell apart?In post 4111, Raven Branwen wrote:I honestly don’t understand how you think I’m buddies with Pooky. Did bugs not try to get Pooky hammered?
and no? bugs voted pooky to E-1. recently before that pooky was already at E-1 but koba (iirc) had unvoted him recently.
Okay, thanks for clarifying this. That’s what I thought. Dats how are you forgetting this?In post 4119, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:bugs didnt know what the VC was when he voted me, he could've hammered me - do you really think he does this if he's my scumbuddy?In post 4113, Datisi wrote:it's an option i'm considering due to the fact that my previous team fell apart?In post 4111, Raven Branwen wrote:I honestly don’t understand how you think I’m buddies with Pooky. Did bugs not try to get Pooky hammered?
and no? bugs voted pooky to E-1. recently before that pooky was already at E-1 but koba (iirc) had unvoted him recently.
only if there were no other bg's in the 70-odd games we're working withIn post 4011, Something_Smart wrote:If he wanted to claim BG, he didn't really have another choice
can you, like, give me the cliffnotes?In post 4015, Something_Smart wrote:Raven is mega scum though and she should die first imo.