Mafiascum.net

Furthermore if you expect me to take someone demanding a fullclaim in a 4000 post replace in instantly as serious you’ve got another thing coming. I always get the lay of the land before claiming. I am not a newb.

@OTM: I'm not exactly confident that you're town because Titus was playing to her scum meta, but IF you are town I think you need to TOWN hunt. ISO players and see who you can totally write off from being Red/Orange Mafia and then you can start scum hunting within the remaining pool. Just a suggestion though.

Also, about religion: It has no effect on the game mechanics. I had targeted brass on N1 and he was converted to Taoism. Since he's a confirmed townie AND the game is not bastard this should be proof enough religion neither hurts nor benefits the target. It's basically a flavoured fruit vendor.

And that’s what I was doing.

Narrowing down worlds and thus providing town.

For example I don’t see Joey as scum.

You were given clarification as to why you should immediately fullclaim. You -responded- to that clarification, but your response was just more stalling. You should avoid trying to frame this as "I thought it was a joke!" when it's very clear you didn't, lying about that is a dead giveaway.

In post 4128, Shaziro wrote:You were given clarification as to why you should immediately fullclaim. You -responded- to that clarification, but your response was just more stalling. You should avoid trying to frame this as "I thought it was a joke!" when it's very clear you didn't, lying about that is a dead giveaway.

Oh look.

Demonstrate Shaziro is full of shit. Then Shaziro jumps to being revisionist. Anyone who knows me knows I do not lie. I fucking can’t.

I am back to reading.

In post 4074, OnTheMark wrote:

In post 4072, BuJaber wrote:Mark you should know shaz claimed vig (the 3rd kill).

Lolz okay So Shaz is SK or a vig.

That makes life easy. Destroy mafia until three dead for each known color and if game continues lynch Shaz for being SK. If game continues after that then each mafia probably had four members. I would find that odd and tilting to say the least given a d1 lynch on scum. Or we just lynch Shaz now since 21/3 = 7 meaning Shaz likely SK but I wanna read Shaz ISO to see if there is any merit to the vig claim. I don’t see how it would make sense numerically to be a vig.

I feel like that's kinda faulty? It's possible it could be 13:4:4, but I'm open to counterargument

In post 4122, Shaziro wrote:I'd be ok lynching OtM I think. The failure to fullclaim when it was specifically explained why -does- look super stally to me. I don't like the way he's catching up and ignoring advice/half reading things that are actually important...something seems off. We've got days, though, so I'm fine with holding my vote on Pine until he catches up. Come on Pine, I've -seen- your play be super good. Do me a proud.

Also there's him saying he'd read Titus' ISO which is ehhhhhhhh mildly indicative of scum trying to keep their claim straight

I'm getting solid scumvibes from OnTheMark. That's gonna sound self-serving, but their posts ping my radar.

FWIW

In post 4123, Almost50 wrote:@Joey: Actually, OTM has just pointed out something... in your reads section you have me as possibly Orange but not either of Marshy/Pidgey. Why?

townreads, you can check the other version of that post to see my read progression

@Bujaber: I don't think you claimed your flavour. Would you mind stating the ruler/civilization you belong to? Thanks.

In post 4132, Pine wrote:I'm getting solid scumvibes from OnTheMark. That's gonna sound self-serving, but their posts ping my radar.

FWIW

You're not the only one.

In post 4129, OnTheMark wrote:

In post 4128, Shaziro wrote:You were given clarification as to why you should immediately fullclaim. You -responded- to that clarification, but your response was just more stalling. You should avoid trying to frame this as "I thought it was a joke!" when it's very clear you didn't, lying about that is a dead giveaway.

Oh look.

Demonstrate Shaziro is full of shit. Then Shaziro jumps to being revisionist. Anyone who knows me knows I do not lie. I fucking can’t.

I am back to reading.

I literally didn't revise shit, I literally repeated myself. My first post about lynching you specifically says you failed to fullclaim despite it being explained why, this post is me saying you were given clarification as to why. This needs rope.

VOTE: OnTheMark

In post 4132, Pine wrote:I'm getting solid scumvibes from OnTheMark. That's gonna sound self-serving, but their posts ping my radar.

FWIW

This didn't contain a vote, my bad. It was meant to.

VOTE: OnTheMark

VOTE: pine i refuse to let you have the privilege to "survivalism-vote" while you have done nothing

In post 4036, Pine wrote:Titus, stick around for me? I've blocked out a couple of hours tonight to this game, and I think you and I can crack this.

Give it one more shot?

I'm pretty sure we're friends this game.

Also this is coming from someone who basically tried to buddy and/or townread to some extent titus

In post 4134, Almost50 wrote:@Bujaber: I don't think you claimed your flavour. Would you mind stating the ruler/civilization you belong to? Thanks.

I am KAMEHAMEHAMEHAMEHAAAAAAA

RULER OF THE POLYNESIANS.

I played this game just to get this character.
Well that is not exactly true. Game sounded cool. I signed up then looked at the list found this character and it became all I cared about.

Why are you asking though?

fuck it won't work

Has anyone else actually admitted to bring converted to a religion, by the way?

In post 4139, Joey_ wrote:VOTE: pine i refuse to let you have the privilege to "survivalism-vote" while you have done nothing

That is, in fact, not what I am doing.

In post 4143, Gamma Emerald wrote:fuck it won't work

I will take a look late tonight after work and other things.

In post 4136, Shaziro wrote:

In post 4129, OnTheMark wrote:

In post 4128, Shaziro wrote:You were given clarification as to why you should immediately fullclaim. You -responded- to that clarification, but your response was just more stalling. You should avoid trying to frame this as "I thought it was a joke!" when it's very clear you didn't, lying about that is a dead giveaway.

Oh look.

Demonstrate Shaziro is full of shit. Then Shaziro jumps to being revisionist. Anyone who knows me knows I do not lie. I fucking can’t.

I am back to reading.

I literally didn't revise shit, I literally repeated myself. My first post about lynching you specifically says you failed to fullclaim despite it being explained why, this post is me saying you were given clarification as to why. This needs rope.

VOTE: OnTheMark

Wtf is your problem? I fullclaimed my role. It’s like right there. Do we have ourselves an SK y’all?

In post 4135, Jodaxq wrote:

In post 4132, Pine wrote:I'm getting solid scumvibes from OnTheMark. That's gonna sound self-serving, but their posts ping my radar.

FWIW

You're not the only one.

Lol I get scumread for breathing as town.

Get used to it.

The time to worry is when I am NOT scumread.

In post 4130, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 4074, OnTheMark wrote:

In post 4072, BuJaber wrote:Mark you should know shaz claimed vig (the 3rd kill).

Lolz okay So Shaz is SK or a vig.

That makes life easy. Destroy mafia until three dead for each known color and if game continues lynch Shaz for being SK. If game continues after that then each mafia probably had four members. I would find that odd and tilting to say the least given a d1 lynch on scum. Or we just lynch Shaz now since 21/3 = 7 meaning Shaz likely SK but I wanna read Shaz ISO to see if there is any merit to the vig claim. I don’t see how it would make sense numerically to be a vig.

I feel like that's kinda faulty? It's possible it could be 13:4:4, but I'm open to counterargument

Assume 13:4:4

A game is balanced for the town with light powers at 13:4. General rule of thumb is 2/3rds town 1/3 anything else.

Town would have to have a rather significant advantage to be 4:4.