So, at minimum, I think it should be clear that DGB's case is bullshit:
1. The main thing of possible substance in her case (i.e., the part that isn't a distortion) is an idea that I am paranoid and indecisive. I don't dispute that at all -- I do in fact play that way and kind of also am that way in general. DGB knows this about me and knows it is NAI. So, she knows that this information is NAI, but is framing it as if it is AI. This is a scummy thing to do.
2. She makes multiple sloppy, unforced errors that show that her case is something she hastily constructed just now --
not
something she has been privately thinking about for 2 game days, as she has since said. For example, she criticizes my mentioning a "case" on myself in a post, when I am responding to a post where IKS had
asked me to do so
. She intimates some kind of occult sinister reason for this, when it's obvious that I'm responding to with (scum)IKS's request. Another example is that she alludes to my pointing out the absurdity of the jester connotations of Rudeboy/NPOM, as if I were the one who was arguing that we forego scumhunting on those grounds (which is LITERALLY THE OPPOSITE of what I was doing!). These are examples of cases where it is VERY EASY to understand my posts, to the extent that I think 1-2 players even called her out on it. If she were really RUMINATING ALONE ABOUT HER PARANOID IDEAS ABOUT ME ALL GAME, as she intimates, she would not make these unforced erorrs! She made the errors because this was all done post-hoc, contrary to what she claimed. Misrepresenting the timeline of events for credibility is a scummy thing to do.
3. Her third point is a defense to my explanation that her dissonance around her playstyle is accounted for by guilt (guilt that does NOT come up for her as town). She basically says "I'm not projecting -- you're projecting!" So, actually, there's a bit of irony here that's mostly neither here nor there, because it IS true that I DO feel guilt voting/pushing her, and I agree with her that that is probably related to my picking up on what was going on in her bizarre post, because that is how affective empathy works in general. But, it is something that comes up for me WHENEVER I play with DGB, REGARDLESS of my alignment, when I think she is scum (and she's EXTREMELY OBVTOWN when she is town, which is why this comes up when she's scum), because I like playing with her. SHE KNOWS THIS IS A THING THAT HAPPENS FOR ME REGARDLESS OF ALIGNMENT. I think I even mentioned this in the last Baker game that we played together, too, just a month or so ago, where I was town and NK'd N1. (Wrench in things: I was wary of her that game and we were both town -- I died N1 so didn't have the opportunity to continue to evaluate her over multiple days -- this is part of why I have alluded to possible changes in her play since 2017.) But, regardless of that, she knows that my having this sort of emotion around her is NAI.
TL;DR -- DGB a) is lying about how her case was constructed and b) she is construing NAI information that she knows is NAI for me as scummy. She is lying scum; shred all lying scums.
Reminder of other evidence that DGB is scum:
1. She claimed almost the same role as IKS and Bambi. All 3 of these probably don't exist in the game. IKS flipped and Bambi's role has produced verified phenomena in the game. DGB is probably lying.
2. She took about 5 days to claim it in bits and pieces (unnecessarily -- and then she played the victim when people pointed out what she had done, saying that she didn't complete her claim because she had not been rung up). DGB wrote her thesis around how this pattern usually means that someone is lying scum.
3. D1 She
said
that scumIKS was scum while joining my NPOM wagon, apparently at the same time that she claims she was privately tormented about my alignment. THIS MAKES NO SENSE. Again, the timeline she is stipulating is obviously fabricated, because she is lying scum (cf., 2 above).
4. When IKS claimed his role, she tried to defuse his wagon by saying it made her think he was town! THIS MAKES NO SENSE. A reasonable person who had DGB's claimed role would immediately infer that IKS was scum after his claim. SHE DID THE
OPPOSITE
OF THAT. This is probably because she is scum, and she doesn't have the role she has claimed.
