Mafiascum.net

In post 4074, Malakittens wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 1000, Roden wrote:VOTE: Ircher

In post 1560, Roden wrote:VOTE: Ircher

This should be E-3. I'll deal with Val later.

In post 2755, Roden wrote:Sorry, was dealing with wedding stuff yesterday, I just finished catching up on the game.

Ircher is caught scum for multiple reasons, I don't believe he's FN and I'm pretty sure he wasn't RB'd. Somebody mentioned earlier that Ircher's reads list looked townie, but also noted that he essentially had written it ahead of time, which leads me to believe it was just fabricated as a last ditch effort to save himself. He also

still

isn't scum hunting, unless you count this:

In post 2587, Ircher wrote:I think Bell scum claimed in the last few pages.

Which is uh, not great.

In post 2450, Ircher wrote:

In post 2449, TheWayItEnds wrote:if your action was roleblocked can you use it tonight? for non consec? im assuming not but worth a check

Nope.

This also feels off. The confident conclusiveness of this answer doesn't add up if the claim is real. The reply is instant, and the only way he could know for sure is if he asked the mod ahead of time, but he doesn't mention that. Very much just feels like a "just trust me bro" response.

Also Val needs to die tonight or tomorrow. He tried to instigate an argument but never responded when I brought the receipts. And then today he's like "oh no where's Roden" as if there isn't an unfinished case against him that he's been ignoring.

Consider my vote spiritually on Ircher, I don't want to put him at E-1 in case he hammers himself to cut off discussion and info exchange. I'm fine to do it when we're ready though.

In post 2810, Roden wrote:

In post 2763, Ircher wrote:

In post 2761, Malakittens wrote:

In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.

Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye

That's not true. I just didn't comment; not everything is worth it at the time. Also, the specifics matter here. You called me out for my initial reaction. Roden is calling me out for providing the standard answer to a question that has a standard answer on this site. That's very different; the former is a good faith engagement even if I disagree. The latter is just incredibly bad faith. You both agree the claim is fake; that's fine, sure; however, the way you reach that conclusion matters, and the way Roden is reaching that conclusion is really iffy compared to yours.

In post 2761, Malakittens wrote:

In post 2758, Ircher wrote:In other news, Roden just dropped several percentage points with how he's spinning things here.

Except he’s referring to me who said it first and you didn’t bat an eye

I was hoping someone would notice this first. Ircher has been ignoring most people who try to case him, only ever replying to people he thinks are easy to out-argue.

In post 2821, Roden wrote:Anyway the real reason Ircher is scum here is because there is a 100% chance we have a Voyeur and/or a Watcher and there's no way they don't sit on Ircher N1 to catch a Roleblocker. But no one's stepping forward to vouch for Ircher besides I guess Andante, who just claimed VT.

Hot take:

let's actually kill scum today. The CORRECT play today is to KILL roden.

Here's why:

Here's roden's first "scum" ircher when there was multiple people already looking that way, but no case, no reasons why.
Then there's the naked vote. That naked vote is placed in spot 6/11. There's no "real" reason, just a naked vote.
Now Roden switches to Val.
1560 again naked jumps onto the wagon for no real reason for E-3
No where around for the last minute switcharoooo.

Now open up to D2:

All of a sudden is convinced that Ircher is lying. Full on bussing. knowing the partner is going down. The other part of the line "someone mentioned that the posts looked fabricated".
The last two posts are distancing between ircer & roden.

Up until the naked vote there was BARELY any mention re:ircher until the naked 6/11 vote & the E-3 vote then the start of D2.

So please for the sake of catching an actual scum. please vote roden

thank you kindly

for my sanity

In post 4123, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 4066, catboi wrote:Yes, the game thread is shit and is in all likelihood already in a loss state for town and as such my desire to put anything forward is at a minimum

Alternatively you can actually come play the game and drop dragging down the rest of us here who are confident in a town win and trying to solve.

In post 4129, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's not like we have to be spiteful in games of mafia all the time.

In post 4127, Malakittens wrote:No roden and Irchers interactions felt like scum distancing to me.

Please note he started to soft the RB after D2 conveniently after Ircher claims he was rb’d.

I’m sorry I don’t see it as town. I feel like it’s scum roden crumbing in case he’s run up for this exact thing

Also if you think flavor is irreveantl then Polaris could be a safe claim for all we know.

Idk what is making you BE SO SURE that roden and Mastina are town

In post 4128, catboi wrote:

In post 4123, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 4066, catboi wrote:Yes, the game thread is shit and is in all likelihood already in a loss state for town and as such my desire to put anything forward is at a minimum

Alternatively you can actually come play the game and drop dragging down the rest of us here who are confident in a town win and trying to solve.

I'm letting you steer the game, have fun solving it, which I'm sure you're doing great at

In post 4130, Malakittens wrote:I mean tbb is doing great. Totally on scum ircher elim

HINT THEY WERENT

OH YASSSS STEERING TO WIN

0:1 tbb

In post 4137, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:flea fuckin like. tell me whats wrong w the roden case dont jus b like "OH ITS CRAP" like break it down cuz its fuckin good

In post 4132, catboi wrote:

In post 4129, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's not like we have to be spiteful in games of mafia all the time.

you're still scum

In post 4126, Malakittens wrote:Here’s the deal.

We don’t know who has the mold.

For all you know it could be a third party

That still doesn’t clear you or Mastina from being scum.

Idk why you’re so hellbent on thinking it makes it Mastina town.

Hint: it doesn’t.

In post 4137, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:i love 2 know that i can go 2 bed n wake up early 2 take the dogs outside n therell b a new n improved trash fire 2 weigh in on

like im understandin why ppl say they hate mafia for real omg

flea fuckin like. tell me whats wrong w the roden case dont jus b like "OH ITS CRAP" like break it down cuz its fuckin good

In post 4138, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:n rodens like. scum by vibes 2. like thats a calculated ass iso. u need 2 sell me on roden town.

In post 4141, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:not u 2 dam i fuckin hate it here i cant have shiiiiiiiiiittttttt in this town omg

In post 4136, The Three Bears wrote: Don't try me Catboi, cause I can play your game and better than you can. You may be able to create a toxic environment but I can thrive in it.