Page 167 of 179

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:38 pm
by SirCakez
Somebody vote no elim k thanks

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:43 pm
by mastina
In post 4148, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:btw have you noticed my cool shiny "conf-town" card
:D
I moved my vote off of you, I just don't have a scumspect to move it onto and I did promise that I was willing to die for my belief in not wanting to win on tasks, on wanting to win by yeeting the last scum so I figured better to vote myself than just unvote. :P

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:46 pm
by mastina
In post 4149, mastina wrote:
In post 4014, Haschel Cedricson wrote:It was me, Windows, and Ower in admin N3.
In post 4078, ManWithNoName wrote:N1: No one
N2: Someone did, it appears to have been Flea.
N3: No one
N4: Someone did affect another room, which I believe would be OWER to Pooky.
Wait, where was Blitzo N3? Was Blitzo with Haschel and Ower N3? Because if Ower was in a different room than Blitzo was N3, shouldn't that show up here?
I do think this is worth answering tho.

Because it could make a very huge difference.

If Blitzo was in the same room as Ower N3 the night Ower blocked Blitzo, then that means, if anyone was sabotaged N3 the saboteur was with them in their room.

If Blitzo was NOT in the same room as Ower N3, then that means,
1: if anyone was sabotaged N3 the saboteur was with them in their room,
2: Blitzo's block does not show up to MWNN's claim,
3: And thus the N4 action was from someone in a different room than Blitzo.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 1:48 pm
by mastina
In post 4152, mastina wrote:
In post 4149, mastina wrote:
In post 4014, Haschel Cedricson wrote:It was me, Windows, and Ower in admin N3.
In post 4078, ManWithNoName wrote:N1: No one
N2: Someone did, it appears to have been Flea.
N3: No one
N4: Someone did affect another room, which I believe would be OWER to Pooky.
Wait, where was Blitzo N3? Was Blitzo with Haschel and Ower N3? Because if Ower was in a different room than Blitzo was N3, shouldn't that show up here?
I do think this is worth answering tho.

Because it could make a very huge difference.

If Blitzo was in the same room as Ower N3 the night Ower blocked Blitzo, then that means, if anyone was sabotaged N3 the saboteur was with them in their room.

If Blitzo was NOT in the same room as Ower N3, then that means,
1: if anyone was sabotaged N3 the saboteur was with them in their room,
2: Ower's block does not show up to MWNN's claim,
3: And thus the N4 action was from someone in a different room than Ower.
Name fix here for clarity since I derped.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:00 pm
by MURDERCAT
In post 4147, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:mastina we are not ruining our perfect yeet rate this game just because you like to go space exploring.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:09 pm
by SirCakez
She has to be scum here

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:09 pm
by MURDERCAT
We should either no elim or vote DGB

mastina if you want to find the last scum look through DGB's iso. Then look through the combined Bell/Flea/blitzo iso. There's your scum.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:11 pm
by MURDERCAT
I feel like mastina scum would just concede, I don't think she has a high stake in the game to play it out. DGB is trolly though so she would.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:11 pm
by MURDERCAT
Unless there's more than 4 scum and there's some tricks still?? I don't see how we aren't about to win on tasks for sure though.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:20 pm
by mastina
In post 4157, MURDERCAT wrote:I feel like mastina scum would just concede, I don't think she has a high stake in the game to play it out. DGB is trolly though so she would.
Oh I very much would not. I realize people aren't too familiar with my scumgame due to me having gone basically two years without rolling scum and even when that ridiculously long townstreak (like 23ish games in a row) was broken it was for incredibly lackluster games.

But I never concede, I never give up.

Not even when given the absolute most bullshit of bullshit scumgames where the setup is tremendously horrifically townsided, replacing in to find myself at the end of the night solo-scum, with a scum role designed to be eliminated during the day specifically meant to be eliminated as the last original groupscum.

I am, notably, the opposite; I am someone who would in fact fight to the bitter end, and I have done so on multiple occasions, quite notably so.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:21 pm
by Battle Mage
In post 4150, SirCakez wrote:Somebody vote no elim k thanks

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:21 pm
by MURDERCAT
Fair enough lol

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:24 pm
by MURDERCAT
You should do what I asked though I promise it won't take long

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:25 pm
by MURDERCAT
Oh you are TGP slot, maybe it is just you lol

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:26 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
IF YOU HAVE AN UNFINISHED TASK THAT YOU NEED TO GO TO A ROOM TO FINISH YOU NEED TO FREAKING TELL US SO WE CAN ISOLATE EVERYONE ELSE IN A DIFFERENT ROOM FROM YOU!

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:28 pm
by Battle Mage
In post 4158, MURDERCAT wrote:scum
In post 4159, mastina wrote:very much
In post 2729, Taly wrote:stalling
In post 173, Taly wrote:ruin
In post 3964, mastina wrote:task wincon
In post 4038, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:No Fucking Way
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read
You have the brain capacity of a unborn Giraffe.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:29 pm
by MURDERCAT
LOL

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:31 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
i should not have given battle mage that much ammo

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:32 pm
by mastina
In post 4156, MURDERCAT wrote:mastina if you want to find the last scum look through DGB's iso. Then look through the combined Bell/Flea/blitzo iso. There's your scum.
DGB's iso isn't actually terrible.

It didn't look like it ever had a post restriction, its votes on scum could be busses, but I don't see it as blaringly obviously being DGB. It mostly seemed like DGB being DGB.

Overall conclusion: could definitely be scum but if you were expecting it to be lockscum from the iso, not so. Scum candidate, sure, but not lockscum.

I suppose it's a good enough starting point to do this tho.
VOTE: DGB.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:33 pm
by PookyTheMagicalBear
fuck it let's just win

VOTE: no elim

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:33 pm
by MURDERCAT
lol maybe mastina is scum

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:33 pm
by MURDERCAT
2/4 ain't bad

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:33 pm
by mastina
In post 4153, mastina wrote:
In post 4152, mastina wrote:
In post 4149, mastina wrote:
In post 4014, Haschel Cedricson wrote:It was me, Windows, and Ower in admin N3.
In post 4078, ManWithNoName wrote:N1: No one
N2: Someone did, it appears to have been Flea.
N3: No one
N4: Someone did affect another room, which I believe would be OWER to Pooky.
Wait, where was Blitzo N3? Was Blitzo with Haschel and Ower N3? Because if Ower was in a different room than Blitzo was N3, shouldn't that show up here?
I do think this is worth answering tho.

Because it could make a very huge difference.

If Blitzo was in the same room as Ower N3 the night Ower blocked Blitzo, then that means, if anyone was sabotaged N3 the saboteur was with them in their room.

If Blitzo was NOT in the same room as Ower N3, then that means,
1: if anyone was sabotaged N3 the saboteur was with them in their room,
2: Ower's block does not show up to MWNN's claim,
3: And thus the N4 action was from someone in a different room than Ower.
Name fix here for clarity since I derped.
And I do repeat, I want this answered because it can make an actual mechanical difference in solving.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:33 pm
by SirCakez
nobody has an unclaimed task with a room they need to go to Pooky
it's over

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2021 2:36 pm
by Battle Mage
In post 4169, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:fuck it let's just win

VOTE: no elim
In post 3916, mastina wrote:I love
In post 4173, SirCakez wrote:Pooky