Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2020 9:03 am
Where are you getting that I think dave is town?
Well we know the role does exist but so far no one else has counterclaimed it, so only way he’s lying is if that were to happen right?In post 4172, Best Bird wrote:Makes no sense why you wouldn't allow someone access to the neighborhood to confirm things you've said here just because you "don't like neighborhoods."In post 4159, Not_Mafia wrote:I don't like neighbourhoods, my role is already proven by dunn
In post 4175, Best Bird wrote:Where are you getting that I think dave is town?
In post 4170, Best Bird wrote:
But sure, go ahead and assume something without giving a chance for a response.
That's the nancy head, right? Right.
You listed four people and said they were all town, implying that the other three are scum. Was that not your intention?In post 4173, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:How are you getting that from my post?
I said “probably” based off of current reads. Read my post again. Obviously the only slot I’m sure is town is us.In post 4180, Something_Smart wrote:You listed four people and said they were all town, implying that the other three are scum. Was that not your intention?In post 4173, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:How are you getting that from my post?
So you think Dave is hedging about his shot because he’s lying about his role?In post 4182, Best Bird wrote:I AM LITERALLY TELLING YOU WHAT I MEANT WITH MY USAGE OF DUMB NANCY
good god
Oh, you’re hardclaiming you didn’t use it? Why not, considering this is Elo? When were you planning to use it then?In post 4161, davesaz wrote:Crumb, and philosophy. Guess what, I play hold-em. Also a crumb. Have not used, and would have wasted it twice so far if I had tried to.In post 2637, davesaz wrote:If we have 1-shots that aremore useful the smaller the player list gets, we give them room and don't out them so that scum don't know who the real danger is.
oh yes, i forgot dunn claimed that "someone" neighbourised him. this confirms the role exists but not necessarily that N_M has it.In post 4177, Best Bird wrote:Confirm things that were said in the neighborhood that n_m has repeated here. Not confirm the role.
the benefit is if N_M is the redirectorIn post 4189, Hoopla wrote:for N_M to be fakeclaiming, it requires scum to have roleswapped, and one of the VT claims to actually be the neighbouriser. i don't see the benefit in playing such tricks, because if the real mafia neighbouriser was ever eliminated, it proves N_M to be scum.
hmmIn post 4191, Something_Smart wrote:the benefit is if N_M is the redirector
um, which posts? i'm pretty sure he considered literally every slot as scum at some point yesterday.In post 4192, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm just gonna sheep Menalque
When I'm sure I can guess who the NK is, of course.In post 4185, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:When were you planning to use it then?
interestingly, this stalemate occurred between two town wagons with nobody choosing to push either through. you'd think if there was two scum there amongst the non-voters {SS/BB/S&M}, they could easily push through one of these wagons through. as a matter of fact, given how single-mindedly defiant davesaz was of menalque being scum, if scum managed to push through a peta mis-elim, they could simply carry dave/mena into a 7p ELo and win. the fact scum didn't take this opportunity implies that there is less than two scum in {SS/BB/S&M} OR that a dave/mena combination in ELo wasn't winning (ergo dave is scum).In post 3877, the worst wrote:
lets first look at it from the perspective that SS is scum:In post 4089, the worst wrote:
i think him being partnered with SS is a real possibility, given he didn't hammer there. there's no way he could logically justify hammering mena given he was infinity's top town read. granted, SS was another of infinity's town reads, so if he's scum, he sort of left himself in a no-win bind where he can't justify a vote on either.In post 4101, the worst wrote: