Mafiascum.net

Wait did Roden get hammered?

Why are we looking for their mason buddy when they can just get shot and flip town verifying that they're not lying?

In post 4174, Dancing Puppets wrote:

In post 4166, Lukewarm wrote:The point is what methodology did DUNN USE.

Correct, when sorting Dunn. The methodology and timing would help sort Dunn after Roden flips. I felt the case may have been prepared too quickly.

First, solve the mason claim.

~Titus

Okay. I am going to walk away, and hopefully all of the remaining mason options will have checked in to confirm or deny

In post 4177, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 4174, Dancing Puppets wrote:

In post 4166, Lukewarm wrote:The point is what methodology did DUNN USE.

Correct, when sorting Dunn. The methodology and timing would help sort Dunn after Roden flips. I felt the case may have been prepared too quickly.

First, solve the mason claim.

~Titus

Okay. I am going to walk away, and hopefully all of the remaining mason options will have checked in to confirm or deny

Or Roden have checked in and outted their partner.

Either way

/:

Okay, am I in completely different world than the rest of you or are some people being completely anti-town in their approach here?

In post 4147, Dancing Puppets wrote:

In post 4144, T-Bone wrote:

In post 4001, Roden wrote:Yeah I'm not going to bother trying to keep up at this point, 70 pages is too much.

I can vaguely tell there's a wagon on me. I'm claiming Mason.

Masons in a game with also a bunch of neighborhoods?

Can someone list every hood?

~Titus

Bell + taly
Math + C+G
You + klick
Me + 1

Roden +1

In post 4111, Dancing Puppets wrote:

In post 4108, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4105, Enchant wrote:

In post 4102, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4094, Enchant wrote:If Roden mislimmed as town and scum somehow shots remaining mason at night, we are bonked hard.

Or we aren’t because then invests don’t die?
Like? No?

What point if mafia waltz in mason claim on almost confirmed status.

They’d have to explain how they are masons with Roden. It’d be an insanely high ridiculous bar and they’d have to show crumbs/evidence before this post

So they’d have to be planning it before Roden’s masons claim

It wouldn’t work

Dunn already showed no one could be masons. In fact....

VOTE: Roden

Like, what is this? Who does this?

What.

In post 4171, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 4170, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 4167, T-Bone wrote:Excluding 5 people besides Pooky for no reason is weird, but it's not like anyone one of those players couldn't come in and either affirm or dispute the claim. If it was me, I'd have just claimed and left Dunn's theory dead in the water. It's not really that manipulative imo, because if Roden is actually a mason and the partner claims then everything Dunn says is moot. It really only applies if Roden is fake claiming.

In post 4169, T-Bone wrote:So like maybe you can make an argument that Dunn knows Roden is fake claiming cause they are both scum...but that doesn't seem to be the argument you're making?

I don't think that scum!dunn wanted to make this argument.

I think that he intended to quote them, copy them, post them in a scum chat, but accidentally posted those reads lists here, and then was backed into explaining why he did that.

I think that he was, in thread, going to pressure for Roden to out his partner.

But in PT, going to try and work out who the partner could be himself.

Weird but all right.

Oi, somebody give me a rationale why we're hunting for or trying to kill a mason claim D1 that isn't completely insane?

This game is impossible to keep up with.

I go to sleep or I go to work and it's 20-30 pages every single time

In post 4182, Bell wrote:

In post 4111, Dancing Puppets wrote:

In post 4108, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4105, Enchant wrote:

In post 4102, MathBlade wrote:

In post 4094, Enchant wrote:If Roden mislimmed as town and scum somehow shots remaining mason at night, we are bonked hard.

Or we aren’t because then invests don’t die?
Like? No?

What point if mafia waltz in mason claim on almost confirmed status.

They’d have to explain how they are masons with Roden. It’d be an insanely high ridiculous bar and they’d have to show crumbs/evidence before this post

So they’d have to be planning it before Roden’s masons claim

It wouldn’t work

Dunn already showed no one could be masons. In fact....

VOTE: Roden

Like, what is this? Who does this?

What.

What indeed!

In post 4184, Bell wrote:Oi, somebody give me a rationale why we're hunting for or trying to kill a mason claim D1 that isn't completely insane?

Dunn doesn't believe the mason claim for reasons he's stated in the thread and he's willing to burn 2 mason slots if its a true claim.

its funny because if LLD had claimed mason dunn would be hiding in a cave somewhere hehehehehe

In post 4188, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its funny because if LLD had claimed mason dunn would be hiding in a cave somewhere hehehehehe

I don't know what you are referring to.

its a joke ^_^

In post 4184, Bell wrote:Oi, somebody give me a rationale why we're hunting for or trying to kill a mason claim D1 that isn't completely insane?

Sure. I think that Roden is fake claiming. I also believe that due to the unique mechanics of this set up, there is no benefit to the remaining potential mason keeping quiet. They are already "burned" and would have to claim immediately following Roden's death, before anyone else dies.

In post 4180, Bell wrote:Okay, am I in completely different world than the rest of you or are some people being completely anti-town in their approach here?

Can you explain the benefit of having bernard stay hidden, in the context of a flipless game.

---

The benefits of forcing him to out are:
We don't incorrectly kill off town!mason!Roden now that a large portion of the player list does not believe the claim

If I am wrong, and the people who don't believe are right, we correctly identify scum!Roden who is fake claiming


Because we are flipless, we cannot just let the bernard claim stay hidden until late game anyways. Because, then scum would being able to fake claim Bernard later in the game, and not even be counter claimed because Bernard is already dead and we did not know.

(If we were not flipless, I would agree that bernard should stay hidden until he came under fire OR the day before ELO, but that could lead to a false clear in this game specifically)

In post 4191, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4184, Bell wrote:Oi, somebody give me a rationale why we're hunting for or trying to kill a mason claim D1 that isn't completely insane?

Sure. I think that Roden is fake claiming. I also believe that due to the unique mechanics of this set up, there is no benefit to the remaining potential mason keeping quiet. They are already "burned" and would have to claim immediately following Roden's death, before anyone else dies.

1. They crumbed something beforehand that's irrefutable.
2. Genuine tone, approach to outting themselves after, do you think scum can sell themselves better than the genuine article.
3. What are the actual odds that the buddy gets shot right after Roden does.
4. What are the odds that Roden gets shot. Or that their buddy gets shot *first*

In post 4191, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 4184, Bell wrote:Oi, somebody give me a rationale why we're hunting for or trying to kill a mason claim D1 that isn't completely insane?

Sure. I think that Roden is fake claiming. I also believe that due to the unique mechanics of this set up, there is no benefit to the remaining potential mason keeping quiet. They are already "burned" and would have to claim immediately following Roden's death, before anyone else dies.

It is weird to have felt just an hour ago that Dunn and I completely mindmelded on the issues that masons cause in a flipless game

But then to feel completely at odds at the very next move he made after that.

Like, just before his post with Pooky's reads list, I was actually mid-typing up a post that I still have the draft of where I said "Dunn immediately thought about the way that the scum team could abuse the claim, and set out to stop it. Town choice imo (plus I feel like we had the exact same thought, which made me feel all warm and fuzzy about dunn's alignment)"

I am going to walk away from this game, and just pray that bernard will have either outed or everyone will have checked in as NotBernard, so that I can reset with either piece of concrete information.

1. They probably did not do this. I checked.
2. Yes I do, on the basis of not having high expectations from town.
3. 1 in 3 if we go by popular consensus on who can be a mason partner. Less if any of those players are mafia.
4. I don't see the relevance in this

Why can’t Rosen just crumb their partner now?

4. If their partner gets shot first they can claim that their partner got shot. So we know who the partner is.

In post 4195, Dunnstral wrote:1. They probably did not do this. I checked.
2. Yes I do, on the basis of not having high expectations from town.
3. 1 in 3 if we go by popular consensus on who can be a mason partner. Less if any of those players are mafia.
4. I don't see the relevance in this

2. This town isn’t any worse than usual town.

In post 4197, Bell wrote:4. If their partner gets shot first they can claim that their partner got shot. So we know who the partner is.

Because that could let a fake!claiming Roden go through?

Literally any town player dies.
No flip.
Roden says that was their partner.

We have no way to verify?