Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2020 1:52 pm
Anyways, sorry for going all mastina on you Cabd. Don’t want to overcomplicate stuff down the line, you know? Not praxisal
Less than cakez, more than bell in antechamber.In post 4198, Brian Skies wrote:Cabd, on a scale of 1-10, how confident are you in this?
She won't talk to me after tales of you.In post 4200, Cobra Kai wrote:Anyways, sorry for going all mastina on you Cabd. Don’t want to overcomplicate stuff down the line, you know? Not praxisal
I don't think it's for any game-serving reason. You can figure out the rest.In post 4018, midwaybear wrote:I'm wondering why he tried to fake being a newbie while also acting like he was an old timer.
WHEREIn post 4207, Brian Skies wrote:Pretty sure Guill was crumbing his vig, and he kind of seemed to enjoy the fact that he got it.
Do you see how the flowchart establishes that me doing my plan doesn't remove the ability to get that guilty at all?In post 4073, Cobra Kai wrote:Let me phrase like this.
Scum want to visit Noraa. If you are town and visit you ruin any chance town has to catch scum who might visit her.
https://xenoblade.fandom.com/wiki/Flesh_EaterIn post 4212, Brian Skies wrote:Well maybe. I was mainly referring to this post.
He even put it in red.
They're saying that they want all drivers accounted for. So anyone who isn't confirmed visiting not-scum is suspicious.In post 4213, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you see how the flowchart establishes that me doing my plan doesn't remove the ability to get that guilty at all?In post 4073, Cobra Kai wrote:Let me phrase like this.
Scum want to visit Noraa. If you are town and visit you ruin any chance town has to catch scum who might visit her.
To further chase this line of thought. Looking at the Noraa wagonIn post 4092, Flavor Leaf wrote:scum is in that Not Voting list, at least 1.
beeboy, Gamma Emerald, Spiffeh, ManWithNoName, REAGAN BUSH 84
keeping this. 4 scum remain, 1 is on me, leaves 3.
At least 1 off (spiffeh fits), at least 1 likely on Noraa.
I think it depends on your interpretation of what counts as a crumb.
That makes more sense. But idk why my plan disrupts cobra's idea?In post 4216, Brian Skies wrote:They're saying that they want all drivers accounted for. So anyone who isn't confirmed visiting not-scum is suspicious.In post 4213, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you see how the flowchart establishes that me doing my plan doesn't remove the ability to get that guilty at all?In post 4073, Cobra Kai wrote:Let me phrase like this.
Scum want to visit Noraa. If you are town and visit you ruin any chance town has to catch scum who might visit her.
So if you visit scum, any scum drivers that may still be in play won't have to visit her.
Because if you visit her, her buddies won't have to and can get confirmed visiting other players.In post 4220, Gamma Emerald wrote:That makes more sense. But idk why my plan disrupts cobra's idea?In post 4216, Brian Skies wrote:They're saying that they want all drivers accounted for. So anyone who isn't confirmed visiting not-scum is suspicious.In post 4213, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you see how the flowchart establishes that me doing my plan doesn't remove the ability to get that guilty at all?In post 4073, Cobra Kai wrote:Let me phrase like this.
Scum want to visit Noraa. If you are town and visit you ruin any chance town has to catch scum who might visit her.
So if you visit scum, any scum drivers that may still be in play won't have to visit her.
There's like 3 people who can confirm me doing stuff like this as town, but 2 are in absentia somewhat and the last is likely scumIn post 4095, Cobra Kai wrote:The people refusing to play ball are likely scum in their final acts of defiance. Power through, town. Roleblock Noraa because even if Gamma is town he’s decided he’s scum