Mafiascum.net

not even talking about the T3 defense overall hes been trying to solve the game to me

i already said y i townread xp

i townread u cuz u seem like u r the same as in the other game we played

all 3 of u have been trying to solve the game

In post 4200, Rathe wrote:not even talking about the T3 defense overall hes been trying to solve the game to me

This isn’t good enough. So you think their reasoning for their SR of my slot holds up?

u all scumread each other though so in my mind im trying to get u off of each other

In post 4204, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 4200, Rathe wrote:not even talking about the T3 defense overall hes been trying to solve the game to me

This isn’t good enough. So you think their reasoning for their SR of my slot holds up?

y do i have to agree with that u arent the only player he has talked about

Okay after finally reading every post in this damn game, I have it something like this.

Town
{Anya [Town Universal Backup]}
Strong Lean Town
{Marky Mark [Miller Claim]}
Lean Town
{Enchant, Rathe, Kerset, DGB [Cop Check, Town], KittyTacky [1-Shot Cop, Checked DGB]}
Slight Lean Town
{Etine [Lazy Babysitter Claim], deep-city-lights/bloodhail, Cabd, Samantha}
Neutral / Could Swing Either Direction
{SaveTheDragons, Artemiana/Anastasia, DeathNote/Almost50, WindowsXP [DkKoba], Vasex}
Slight Lean Scum
{NDMath, Dunnstral}
Lean Scum
{Nero Cain}
Scum
{T3 [1-Shot Bulletproof, Turning Into N1/N2 Cop Claim, Mafia Cop]}

I will probably have to ISO some of those slots I have in the Slight Town Lean down, but I’m exhausted now and I want to focus on some of the other games I’m playing.

it is a big picture solving the game means u have good and bad reads

when we believe something to be true we push it whether it is wrong or not

but when u r not trying to solve the game or ur logic is weird or u act dumb it is suspicious

In post 4208, Rathe wrote:it is a big picture solving the game means u have good and bad reads

Sigh. It isn’t just a bad read. It’s a bad one with Scummy logic. Nero argued I “lied”. They didn’t analyze the wagons up until then and the movement and concluded that I was “exaggerating” or something like that (which I clearly wasn’t). They said that I was inflating my role in T3’s execution and that I lied. How is this acceptable to you?

In post 4207, Andresvmb wrote:I will probably have to ISO some of those slots I have in the Slight Town Lean down, but I’m exhausted now and I want to focus on some of the other games I’m playing.

no problem take care

ur only town read is dead town...then a buncha leans

In post 4213, Nero Cain wrote:ur only town read is dead town...then a buncha leans

Fuck off.

In post 4214, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 4213, Nero Cain wrote:ur only town read is dead town...then a buncha leans

Fuck off.

I have always presented my reads in this fashion. I don’t call players Town or Scum with 100% certainty until we see their Role PMs. Go check ANY game I’ve played on this site if you want confirmation. Like this is just annoying.

In post 4211, Andresvmb wrote:Nero argued I “lied”. They didn’t analyze the wagons up until then and the movement and

concluded that I was “exaggerating” or something like that

no, I didn't lol. the wagon never completely died and you and Mark overstating your contributions. And now you are lying about what I said.

In post 3754, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 3726, Kerset wrote:So far Andre case seems to be just Nero OMGUS

tbf i was calling andre scummy long b4 he even voted me.

In post 475, Nero Cain wrote:

Andresvmb

Artemiana
DrippingGoofball

are all scummy lurkers

his "case" on me is that I thought T3 was town so I must be scum.

honestly man, andre cheerleading the t3 wagon from the sidelines while vanity voting me and then when called on it lied and said his wagon "died" is like scum AF.

You said I lied. How am I misinterpreting your case against me? More garbage.

In post 4211, Andresvmb wrote:Sigh. It isn’t just a bad read. It’s a bad one with Scummy logic. Nero argued I “lied”. They didn’t analyze the wagons up until then and the movement and concluded that I was “exaggerating” or something like that (which I clearly wasn’t). They said that I was inflating my role in T3’s execution and that I lied. How is this acceptable to you?

well i asked u in 3274 y u didnt vote for T3 i dont think u answered or saw it

you said that I said that you were exaggerating and I never said that.

can you guys stop fighting Andres

he's just town here I think.

y is it a scummy thing to ask u this question or assume u might be mafia

In post 4218, Rathe wrote:

In post 4211, Andresvmb wrote:Sigh. It isn’t just a bad read. It’s a bad one with Scummy logic. Nero argued I “lied”. They didn’t analyze the wagons up until then and the movement and concluded that I was “exaggerating” or something like that (which I clearly wasn’t). They said that I was inflating my role in T3’s execution and that I lied. How is this acceptable to you?

well i asked u in 3274 y u didnt vote for T3 i dont think u answered or saw it

Because it’s silly and you should know better. I have very strongly argued for 2 players as Scum in this game. Did you want me to vote for both of them simultaneously? Like what is the expectation here exactly? I couldn’t get T3 through when I came back I didn’t think because there was a lot of posting about how we should let the claim resolve itself. So I voted my next best guess in Nero. Regardless of what you think of my alignment, do you not believe that I would have voted T3 towards the end of the day given how strongly I was arguing against the slot? A simple yes or no would suffice.

from a town point of view

In post 4211, Andresvmb wrote:They didn’t analyze the wagons up until then

I was showing the evidence that you weren't as big a part of the t3 wagon as you'd like others to think you are.