Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:44 pm
that ellipses means that you have literally stunned me into silence.
Page 170 of 287
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:44 pm
if you want to stun me into silence, say more things like that.
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:45 pm
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:i said that i had a reason to call tictac town and that cakez should probably vote axel over tictac and you thought that I was crumbing a result on seniors?
and how does the cia part fit into things in particular?
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:48 pm
Lol. Can we go back.to talking about how tpp claimed that claiming would out prs but later said he had no info on prs?
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:48 pm
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:akez,Chave a pretty good idea where your tictac scumread is coming from, but they aren't scum.Ixel would be a better vote.A
Combined with the "Old School" comment, I really thought you were talking about old-school breadcrumbing.
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:i said that i had a reason to call tictac town and that cakez should probably vote axel over tictac and you thought that I was crumbing a result on seniors?
Yep, I thought the result was on Seniors and you had a strong read on tictac so included it as crumb-dross.
In fact the mention of Axel really doesn't make sense there either (although I know you'd explained that afterward). But the post itself comes across exactly as an investigative crumb.
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:49 pm
Hiplop, is that what you saw?
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:50 pm
I am not familiar with CIA as a role but holy shit is that a theory.
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:52 pm
hipeowqfieowrjgqhekrjgbkejrbgke
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:53 pm
Closest I could come was Forensic Investigator which would give you results on who else had visited any dead party you investigated.
But it didn't really make sense, so here I sit, awaiting clarification on what this nebulous role could possibly be.
Which you're refusing to give.
And which I don't know if I want to push for.
Anyway
But it didn't really make sense, so here I sit, awaiting clarification on what this nebulous role could possibly be.
Which you're refusing to give.
And which I don't know if I want to push for.
Anyway
I really need to do other stuff
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:53 pm
dajflkdajlkfdlkfajlkd yourself.
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:54 pm
no it has to be hip[wqpeffwosifebnwiqjfbakj because i'm trying to get hiplop to reappear
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:55 pm
OGRE THEY CONTRADICTED THEIR CLAIMS PLEASE 
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:55 pm
the truth is much simpler than the theories spinning around in your head currently
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:57 pm
but your theory has sort of helped to lift me out of a mood that was souring, so as a reward, I will continue to do nothing of use and will instead amuse myself by messing with dwlee
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:57 pm
have fun doing things!
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:58 pm
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:07 pm
no rhyme nor reason in that poem F-
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:08 pm
On a serious, saying info about your role is claiming on a smaller level. Stop trying to argue semantics and answer how tf your contradicton makes sense
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:32 pm
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:36 pm
I agree that there were some contradictions in TPP's statements--
"the truth is much simpler"
then what is it?
"the truth is much simpler"
then what is it?
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:39 pm
simpler =/= good for town to out
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:39 pm
which sucks because it would have been much easier to handle if it didn't get blown out of proportion to the extent it did but here we are anyways
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:40 pm
tpp youre full of crap lmao
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:45 pm
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:so essentially what this post reads to me is that you're looking at this game from the lens of guilty until proven innocent. You're recognizing things that we do as scum, okay, sure. But what's convincing you that what we're saying excludes the possibility of us being town? That's what you haven't been conveying to me, and I find that worrying. I think that a lot of the stuff you've done is mislynch logic which is also worrying.
Uhhh this isn't the court of law this is mafia
You just admitted you're doing things you would do as scum, and are trying to play word gymnastics to say that's a bad reason to scum read you
You're literally saying not to scum read you over the things you do as scum
What
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2016 5:46 pm
flubber vote tpp