Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:26 pm
I stopped liking c9 after they cut Sneaky.
I have no idea who I’m rooting for this season. I think 100T?
I have no idea who I’m rooting for this season. I think 100T?
But sneaky cosplay with his gf. (He should wife her)In post 4225, Cobra Kai wrote:I stopped liking c9 after they cut Sneaky.
I have no idea who I’m rooting for this season. I think 100T?
I think you've hydra'd with Glenn peck before.In post 4228, Cobra Kai wrote:Did I though? I hope they move that caster to reg games he’s great.
If I wasn't clear. If Noraa is lying in any way, I'll know, and will be okay turbo-limming her D3. My death also serves as condemnation for Noraa.In post 4109, Cobra Kai wrote:That you are targeting confirmed scum who has every reason to lie about their role and you are giving them the chance to take another action without risking a buddy being caught
Thanks for scumclaiming based on flavor's wagon specIn post 4115, Will catch up later maybe wrote:This is your daily reminder that lynching Spiffeh today is silly as shit especially now that he claimed a confirmable role. It's a high risk - low reward play on town's part which is needlessly stupid.
I have nothing but free time in the middle of the night. I've been watching past seasons of the China and Japan leagues.In post 4233, Cobra Kai wrote:If you have some free time Cabd go watch some of those academy vods! I really like how he goes back and figures out the game plan after stuff happens.
In post 4130, Brian Skies wrote:I presume we lynch Noraa -> LLD.
your wholehearted devotion to these two lims feels agenda-drivenIn post 4131, Brian Skies wrote:Which kinda sorta entices me into lynching Spiffeh for that alone.
But I'd rather just lynch Noraa -> LLD.
Can you try?In post 4149, Brian Skies wrote:Also, some of you might find it kind of shocking, but I still don't townread Cobra Kai.
I don't know what it is. I just don't.
Yes, it's called lynching scum.In post 4240, Gamma Emerald wrote:your wholehearted devotion to these two lims feels agenda-driven
what's the point of confidence where it gets to be >rand scum?In post 4202, Cabd wrote:Less than cakez, more than bell in antechamber.In post 4198, Brian Skies wrote:Cabd, on a scale of 1-10, how confident are you in this?
Cakez was a solid 9.
This is a solid 7.5/8ish
Bell was a good 6.
Is there an issue with me doing this instead?In post 4236, Cabd wrote:Will literally locktown the first of the two within {beeboy, man with no name} to pop up and vote spiffeh.
I don't think your adamance about it is natural, though. Maybe I'm wrong, I don't think this is an especially strong tell, but it's also not the only thing that's bugged me about you.In post 4244, Brian Skies wrote:Yes, it's called lynching scum.In post 4240, Gamma Emerald wrote:your wholehearted devotion to these two lims feels agenda-driven
coolIn post 4246, Cabd wrote:Uhhh, 0 is "rand" 5 is "75% confident" and 10 is "I have a guilty"
9 is "I have a extremely strong meta tell" guilty
7.5? This is "Everything about the way I see the game at present clicks" but I have no meta tell or mechanical guilty, and is about as high as I can go without either of those.