Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 11:17 am
There's a club.In post 4210, Menalque wrote:Does a game exist where NC has not scumread me?
There's a club.In post 4210, Menalque wrote:Does a game exist where NC has not scumread me?
I actually didn't fully absorb who I was replying to, hence the "Nashville" instead of "you". My first sentence was part of the explanation for why I was on that wagon, not why your question was invalid. I already answered the substance of your question. The wagons that I've joined are on people who I scumread. The wagons that I haven't joined are on people who I don't scumread. I haven't particularly followed who is a counter wagon to whom due to the infrequent votecounts. I'm also much less inclined to join a wagon led by someone I scumread. Part of the reason I joined the original bnuuy wagon (if I'm remembering correctly) is that it was led by people I townread. Despite Flavor Leaf's insistence that the whole game has revolved around catboi, I don't think that's terribly accurate.In post 4215, Nashville Dreams wrote:Your answer is semantic rather useful. Your response to my allegation is to claim 1) my question isn't valid because you scumread me. I think we can all see the problem with that. 2) it nitpicks the substance rather than gets at the substance.
A counterwagon is a wagon that exists at the same time as another.
Catboi and Monkey were counters early. You were on Monkey.
Catboi and I were counters. You were on me.
Arguably you weren't on Wallflower, but you were on Monkey at the time.
Bnuuy started at 3631, while catboi was still there. The wagon on me was dying and you jumped.
Even if you disagree with the semantics of "counterwagon", you still are fine or have been fine with every single major wagon this game but for catboi and tictac.
What gives?
In post 284, tictac wrote:twas kinda "don't do the annoying thing" post at Aaron.In post 281, Hectic wrote:tictac: Were you hinting at something more in 93, or just kidding around?
I guess there's a mild associative there tho, since wake also answered my guestion directed at Aaron.
zzzIn post 4216, Nero Cain wrote:butterchurn can die too, so can bunny
Yeah, okay, that is pretty similar. Good catch.In post 4233, SCP 682 wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... ct[]=25917
wild. it was pretty similar and he even quit the game.
AND THE QUESTION THING IS ACTUALLY THERE -> IT IS A GIMMICK SCUM TICTAC HAS OMG
it was ANSWERED there but tictac DOES pay attention to questions as scum -> so @butter seeing this tell me what u think
In post 284, tictac wrote:twas kinda "don't do the annoying thing" post at Aaron.In post 281, Hectic wrote:tictac: Were you hinting at something more in 93, or just kidding around?
I guess there's a mild associative there tho, since wake also answered my guestion directed at Aaron.
VOTE: YdrasseIn post 4218, Ydrasse wrote:i’m malefactor and you can’t do anything about it
Discrediting a flawed argument is a perfectly valid response. You're expecting a macro response to a case you've fine tuned with different parameters.In post 4202, SCP 682 wrote:Notice Keeper is discrediting me here- but not actually providing a real counter argument.In post 4196, The Keeper wrote:You provided a single run.In post 4194, SCP 682 wrote:I have provided substantiated proof with quote comparison and you have provided a weak "well um i have played with tictac and i think town tictac!"
I can say I've done a Lamb/Mega Santa/Delirium run in one and it doesn't make me good at the game.
You used an outlier game, and the mini games play entirely differently to large.
Oddly off point for you actually.
Code: Select all
Total random samples of 4 items taken: 1,000,000
Total with NO scum: 113,224 (11.322400%)
Total with Mafia: 561,842 (56.184200%)
Total with Wolf: 562,500 (56.250000%)
Total with Malefactor: 173,686, (17.368600%)
Total with any scum: 886,776, (88.677600%)
Total with hostile scum: 846,198, (84.619800%)
===============================
Total random samples of 4 items taken: 100
Total with NO scum: 12 (12.000000%)
Total with Mafia: 51 (51.000000%)
Total with Wolf: 53 (53.000000%)
Total with Malefactor: 18, (18.000000%)
Total with any scum: 88, (88.000000%)
Total with hostile scum: 85, (85.000000%)
===============================
Total random samples of 4 items taken: 10
Total with NO scum: 2 (20.000000%)
Total with Mafia: 7 (70.000000%)
Total with Wolf: 3 (30.000000%)
Total with Malefactor: 2, (20.000000%)
Total with any scum: 8, (80.000000%)
Total with hostile scum: 8, (80.000000%)
I have a "clear agenda" to use shielded tears on people I think are town.In post 4204, SCP 682 wrote:Keeper has a clear agenda to defend tictac while not really being able to truly substantiate their tictac read.
my money's on tictac flipping a good PR
neener neenerIn post 4241, Sword of Ducks wrote:VOTE: YdrasseIn post 4218, Ydrasse wrote:i’m malefactor and you can’t do anything about it
I think I've been fairly consistent in being willing to join wagons with my townreads/on people I scumread, and less interested in wagons led by people I scumread/on people I don't scumread. I think Nashville Dreams' analysis of it is in bad faith, and is setting out to prove a narrative that she came up with. Still would love to vote there, but it seems that's not happening toDay anymore.In post 4240, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think butter's is just town probs defending wagons.
He defended both Catboi and myself too.
Malefactors a miselimination. It's in their favour to be eliminated.In post 4208, Nero Cain wrote:I like having correct reads and a d1 norway flip would have been glorious.In post 4193, bnuuy wrote:???In post 4181, Nero Cain wrote:p disappointed that I didn't get to call out scum norway unless u guys think that the Malefactor claim is bs and Yd is trying to buy time
First, why are you disappointed about that specifically
Second, why do you think Ydrasse is aiming to “buy time” with a Malefactor claim? Buy time for what? For whom?
and ummm we aren't voting out the claimed Malefactor for ??? reason so like claiming seems to have stalled their wagon wich sorta proves my point
looks like democracy is disagreeing with your take keeper.In post 4242, The Keeper wrote:Discrediting a flawed argument is a perfectly valid response. You're expecting a macro response to a case you've fine tuned with different parameters.In post 4202, SCP 682 wrote:Notice Keeper is discrediting me here- but not actually providing a real counter argument.In post 4196, The Keeper wrote:You provided a single run.In post 4194, SCP 682 wrote:I have provided substantiated proof with quote comparison and you have provided a weak "well um i have played with tictac and i think town tictac!"
I can say I've done a Lamb/Mega Santa/Delirium run in one and it doesn't make me good at the game.
You used an outlier game, and the mini games play entirely differently to large.
Oddly off point for you actually.
Code: Select all
Total random samples of 4 items taken: 1,000,000 Total with NO scum: 113,224 (11.322400%) Total with Mafia: 561,842 (56.184200%) Total with Wolf: 562,500 (56.250000%) Total with Malefactor: 173,686, (17.368600%) Total with any scum: 886,776, (88.677600%) Total with hostile scum: 846,198, (84.619800%) =============================== Total random samples of 4 items taken: 100 Total with NO scum: 12 (12.000000%) Total with Mafia: 51 (51.000000%) Total with Wolf: 53 (53.000000%) Total with Malefactor: 18, (18.000000%) Total with any scum: 88, (88.000000%) Total with hostile scum: 85, (85.000000%) =============================== Total random samples of 4 items taken: 10 Total with NO scum: 2 (20.000000%) Total with Mafia: 7 (70.000000%) Total with Wolf: 3 (30.000000%) Total with Malefactor: 2, (20.000000%) Total with any scum: 8, (80.000000%) Total with hostile scum: 8, (80.000000%)
You gave me 10 and are acting like its 100, I gave 100 and you didn't like it.
You want to go through other games? You do that. this is tictown for now.