Hi you still haven't responded to my 351, any thoughts/comments/etc would be greatly appreciated kthx.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:42 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
↑jasonT1981 wrote:His points are rubbish against me, and truthfully if that is all you got, go home son.... nothing for you here.
lolol that's not a response please don't write that again or I'm literally going to lock my vote on you till you're dead. You wanted fucking reasons for me voting you, I gave them (before you even went on your tantrum of me not justifying ) and I end up with this crap?
Mmk.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:45 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
Also while you're explaining things mind explaining that SD scumread of yours because dear does that look like it just materialized out of thin air.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:47 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
I mean the only thing you literally mentioned about him was the end of your 122 and there is no way you went from that to HELL YEA I CAN GO WITH THIS WAGON.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:52 am
by ChannelDelibird
OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game. Still prefer the SAD wagon for now though.
(More when I'm not trying to play mafia on skype at the same time.)
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:55 am
by absta101
Post #268 by SAD is slightly scummy. I don't like the fact that he calls the people town-reading him naive, it doesn't seem genuine. If players were town-reading me for invalid reasons I would at least consider the possibility that they are scum trying to buddy me.
If you're gonna put me as town, it better be for a damn good reason.
Also this looks really fake. Town either suspect the people town-reading them or accept the town read because it's right (but who cares if it's for the wrong reasons). Scum usually always accept any town read or they can challenge it to make themselves look even more town (the WIFOM part I guess).
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:56 am
by Ser Arthur Dayne
↑ChannelDelibird wrote:OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game. Still prefer the SAD wagon for now though.
SAD =/= SD. Unless you secretly have a scumread on me
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:56 am
by absta101
↑petapan wrote:SAD do you think that people townreading you are just naive or possibly scum who are faking reads
This is a question from town.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:57 am
by Cerulean
↑ChannelDelibird wrote:OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game.
↑ChannelDelibird wrote:OK, in that page McStab pretty strongly deviated from what I would have expected based on our previous game. Still prefer the SAD wagon for now though.
SAD =/= SD. Unless you secretly have a scumread on me
My bad. Sorry bro. Stand easy.
Cerulean - despite being in a game in which he took a lot of heat, I never saw McStabTown take quite that same "I don't give a fuck, haters gonna hate" tone he did last page. Until now I thought he looked fairly consistent.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:10 pm
by absta101
Post #351 by SAD makes some sense. I was town-reading Jason for his gambit but this changed my mind.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 12:20 pm
by absta101
↑petapan wrote:for real though why are people ignoring safetydance
bs noise post. SD was the second largest waggon at that point (unless i'm blind).
stopping here, getting late.
sorry for the multi-post-spam.
↑McStab wrote:This may be OMGUS but I think he's been trying to drift under the radar, so I'd be into a Plessie wagon if it forms
Not going to lie -- the fact that 411 was literally
immediately
followed by post after post of people declaring that you actually do look pretty scummy was quite gratifying.
~ Pless
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:09 pm
by The Mini-Librarian
↑camn wrote:I am not convinced on Jasonscum. It certainly could be that he is fooling me, but I generally feel confident on my gut reads of Jason.
In re: my so-called "obsession"..... if that's gonna keep getting mentioned, I would like someone to point out where it actually happened. I am officially telling you that it was just a question, and one I would want answered any time someone displays a weird post-style. But to spin it as "obsession "...... It does occur to me to wonder why anyone would spin it that way So cite, please. Or retract.
Yeah, maybe "obsession" was hyperbolic, but when you ask the same question twice (147 and 182) AFTER he essentially answered your question (82 and 123) it's not going to sit with me well.
--
Remember when I said I was going to meta peta? Well I did. He's scum.
see this is whatb I dont understand about my wagon, lots of Jason is scum... he is scum because of wall posts... but actually shit all explaining as to why I am scum.
Hmm...don't think anyone said hey Jason is scum for making wall posts. Your wall posts comment on really trivial things and lack real content, so it looks like you're trying to comment n a bunch of stuff to look busy and engaged.
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:33 pm
by Cerulean
↑petapan wrote:for real though why are people ignoring safetydance
Why are you so focused on it? He is scummy but scum? Not so sure, why aren't ou trying to figure that out?
↑Baby Spice wrote:Really not appreciating Tammy wall quoting.
YEAH f**K tammy
Yeah! Boo Tammy she sucks!
But, baby, what are you referring to and does it say anything about my alignment?
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:19 pm
by Ser Arthur Dayne
<--- Hey look I'm in rehab.
↑Plessiezarus wrote:Don't understand this comment. Please explain. Are you disagreeing with TML's claim that absta looks worse than SafetyDance, or are you suggesting there's no hope of SafetyDance ever "contributing something good"?
The latter.
↑Plessiezarus wrote:Right now, which of the two do you think looks more likely to be scum?
Prob none actually? I mean they're... just
there
.
↑Plessiezarus wrote:What makes you think Baby Spice is town?
Gut + some genuineness. Not really strong though.
↑Plessiezarus wrote:Did you have a town-read on TML before your 396, and if so, why? (Is it because of his 390, is what I guess I'm really asking.)
Eh he was on his way to "townland" and I guess you can say that post pushed him over the fence.
↑Plessiezarus wrote:Or a town-read on Vifam before he replaced out? (Though the manner of his replace-out does seem townish, actually, so maybe that's a good read after all.)
Vifam's 40 actually reads very genuine and townish in retrospect. It seems natural, + don't think if Vifam was actually a cop and white he would've said that. The one black people IIRC from the cops (in s1) are Kima and Freamon. Kima is a girl, so that leaves Freamon. Meh, so it somewhat lowers the odds of him having a scumrole.
↑Plessiezarus wrote:For someone who insists early town-reads on him are "hilariously naive", you seem to have quite a few naive reads yourself.
↑petapan wrote:so vote safetydance, he's still voting SAD when SAD is clearly contributing and playing the game and isn't RPing as much, and is just trying to justify his crap vote instead of moving forward and saying anything meaningful
I don't know dude, I thought Safety's first two posts were really bad but I just read his recent posting and I'm getting the same vibes I got from Nostedeus - basically, that he's just incompetent and not really scummy. I don't think him trying to push a policy-type lynch on Arthur and justifying it is really that bad given his inexperience and how much negative attention he drew from it earlier. Plus, I thought the way he lashed out at TML in #304 with the whole "don't pigeonhole me" type stuff was pretty genuine and townish. I haven't talked to Tammy about him yet though (I think she might still be scumreading him?) and I do agree that he does need to involve himself a little more in scumhunting than self-defense at this stage.
P.S.: Answer this pls (though change the Vifam question to "Why do you think Vifam might be scum?")
↑petapan wrote:so vote safetydance, he's still voting SAD when SAD is clearly contributing and playing the game and isn't RPing as much, and is just trying to justify his crap vote instead of moving forward and saying anything meaningful
I don't know dude, I thought Safety's first two posts were really bad but I just read his recent posting and I'm getting the same vibes I got from Nostedeus - basically, that he's just incompetent and not really scummy. I don't think him trying to push a policy-type lynch on Arthur and justifying it is really that bad given his inexperience and how much negative attention he drew from it earlier. Plus, I thought the way he lashed out at TML in #304 with the whole "don't pigeonhole me" type stuff was pretty genuine and townish. I haven't talked to Tammy about him yet though (I think she might still be scumreading him?) and I do agree that he does need to involve himself a little more in scumhunting than self-defense at this stage.
P.S.: Answer this pls (though change the Vifam question to "Why do you think Vifam might be scum?")
i think it is a bad move given inexperience because that's what inexperience scum does - they whinge about people being
anti-town
and try to push based on that because they have difficulty calling people actually scummy
the first time you asked it i didn't have a read. at the time of him replacing out, I read him and leaned scum because while him getting bored and frustrated with the game is pretty much just him being vifam, i know he prefers being town to being scum, and he didn't really come off with many solid opinions where looking at him in homestuck he had a few early on that he gave some reasoning for and i didn't see a similarity here
that said i haven't read anything that BT is posted and do not plan to for a while
) and I end up with this crap?
So cite, please. Or retract.
