Page 18 of 21

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:46 pm
by Tamuz
Nai wrote:I just speak what I see. Not meant as anything more than a fact.

Now I remember. Sorry, brain is atrophying while playing 3 mafia games, modding a fourth, and getting ready to mod one here. I just need to start taking notes, that's all.

I still would like to see TINM dead, just for bad plays and illogical comments.
Well bloo me and ??? could just be doing an amazing ploy. You really don't know how dumb I could be, eh?

Despite recent developements, I still think stark is our kingpin. I was spot on about Lying Bryan, I have the same feeling with Stark. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe Stark has RC'ed...My vote stays

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:17 pm
by This is not me
Bloojay group seems scummy to me beacause they just are 3 people and there is another manson and 1 of the mansons is obviously lying and 3 players fit better into mafia, but after the Iammars not answering to no kill question i started to tink that the 2 person manson +nightkillblocker could be mafia too....

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:35 pm
by Nai
So you've decided that everyone that's claimed mason is a higher chance of being mafia than, say, anyone else? Again, read my post about how stupid you'd have to be to be mafia making a three person mason group. Granted, I'd like to test that mason group somehow. But no good way is coming up.
Well bloo me and ??? could just be doing an amazing ploy. You really don't know how dumb I could be, eh?
Is it an amazing ploy? And how dumb CAN you be? Care to explain?

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:46 pm
by Tamuz
This is not me wrote:Bloojay group seems scummy to me beacause they just are 3 people and there is another manson and 1 of the mansons is obviously lying and 3 players fit better into mafia, but after the Iammars not answering to no kill question i started to tink that the 2 person manson +nightkillblocker could be mafia too....
Nightblocker... like *cough* YOU. And Pata, please learn the term Mason. Manson isn't a real word... just last names, or rather scary people.

Nai, I was saying that as a set-up to express distrust in the BJ/You mason group. I'm not to sure about how dumb you could be, just as you are with me. Therefore, I feel I cannot trust neither you nor BJ.

Iunno, I can't meta-game with this little experience

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:36 am
by Nai
I was mostly joking with the last statement, acting like some mystery movie that I can't remember. As I said when I first came out about me and BJ, we are NOT masons. All we know is that the person holding the name in our role PM is good. We didn't know, in the beginning, that either of us were the other person. The reason I didn't believe that BJ was good in the beginning was because all he said was "I know a name, that's all." But when he gave exact names (c'mon, he has a 1 in 24 chance of getting names right if he guesses), that cleared him for me.

Here's convenience for you. We have 8 people left. 5 people are claiming masons. That leaves three people. We probably have a three person mafia group. Look:

Tamuz/Bloojay/Nanook: 3 person mason group.
BJ/Nai: 2 person "pseudo" mason group.
This Is Not Me: Roleblocker who blocked a dead guy each night.
Raj: 2 night kill-blocker.
Stark: Hasn't claimed yet.

Here's my plan. There are three ways scum could be in this game that makes the most sense.

1.) Tamuz/Bloojay/Nanook are scum. A play so dumb that it's SO dumb that it could almost work. But it's a WIFOM situation.

2. Raj/Stark/TINM: Seems the most likely to me. The three outcasts. I can almost guarentee that Stark will claim Cop to get us off his ass.

3. Me/BJ/Someone else: I'll say right now that this isn't true, but for the sake of science, it has to be considered a possibility.

To prove any group true we have to lynch someone. We do NOT have three days, gentleman, to waste on test lynches. We need to be right today or tomarrow to win. Preferably today. I suggest we lynch someone from the outcasts. TINM seems the most likely lynch to me, Stark following a close second. If they are town, turn to the three person mason group and lynch Nanook for not only being a lurker, but also for being in that group.

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:39 pm
by This is not me
my idea= lynch rajr beacause he a) has used up all his abilities and b) he would be in the 2nd group of scummys and c) he might be in the 3th goup of scummies or you could lynch me,but then i couldnt block nanook,who i think is godfather beacause the 1st scummy group reavealed him the latest.

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:49 pm
by Nai
Rajr HASN'T used up all his abilities. Or so he says. If he is town and still has that ability, then he can delay a loss for town one more day. You, on the other hand, are a liability. If you do happen to be scum with that ability, you could block anyone useful. Which could be a problem.

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:18 pm
by BabyJesus
vote stark

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:25 pm
by Tamuz
This is not me wrote:my idea= lynch rajr beacause he a) has used up all his abilities and b) he would be in the 2nd group of scummys and c) he might be in the 3th goup of scummies or you could lynch me,but then i couldnt block nanook,who i think is godfather beacause the 1st scummy group reavealed him the latest.
Not to mention you did half confess you were mafia, see This:
Tamuz wrote:
This is not me wrote: i started to tink that the 2 person manson +nightkillblocker could be mafia too....
Nightblocker... like *cough* YOU.
Stark or TINM, I'm impartial, From previous days I like Stark as a vote, from today I like Pata

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:38 pm
by bloojay
Vote TINM

too many contradictions. far too many for you to be kept alive.

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 8:32 pm
by This is not me
to nai:
rajrhcpfreak wrote:I'm Dylan.

i sing my protest songs 2 times in the game to stop all kills that will happen in the night.

i decided to do it night one. i havnt done it agian for my second/last time.

ive been trying to figure out if there would be 2 roleblockers.. well mine isnt a role blocker exactly....

i almost beleive This is Not Me. so im thinking we ahve some uber mafia.
like he has used up all his times
to tamuz: me=roleblocker rajrh= nightkillblocker beacause he can only block nightkills

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:12 am
by Nai
To TINM:
Rajrhcpfreak wrote:I'm Dylan.

i sing my protest songs 2 times in the game to stop all kills that will happen in the night.

i decided to do it night one. i
havnt
done it agian for my second/last time.

ive been trying to figure out if there would be 2 roleblockers.. well mine isnt a role blocker exactly....

i almost beleive This is Not Me. so im thinking we ahve some uber mafia.
What, can you not read? "Havn't" is the contracted form of "have not", which is the past tense of "has not", as in, "He has not done it for the second time." Please, use that brain that I know you have before arguing with mine. Thanks. :mrgreen:

I think that TINM should die just for that. It sounds a bit calculated to me. He wants to stay alive so he tried to use mis-direction to get another person killed. All opposed to killing TINM raise your hand. All in favor, vote him so we can see if we're right.

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:01 pm
by Iammars
And yea he doth spake:


TINM- 3 (Nai, stark, bloo)

stark- 2 (Tamuz, BJ)

Not voting (3): raj, TINM, Nanook

5 to lynch.

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 12:24 pm
by Tamuz
unvote: Stark
vote: This is not me

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 1:19 pm
by BabyJesus
unvote: Stark
vote: This is not me


either one works for me...

Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 1:20 pm
by BabyJesus
RIP tinm

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 2:39 pm
by Iammars
And you just lynched
This is not me, Television, Roleblocker



And uh... I have all the night choices already, so I'll give 24 hours for talking.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 2:41 pm
by Iammars
And now to lock the thread.

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:09 pm
by Iammars
Let's try this verse one more time...


Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Studebaker, Television
North Korea, South Korea, Marilyn Monroe!

YUS! Of course that dead body propped up agaisnt the wall thereis disagreeing. How sad that he had to be killed twice. Sorry Mr random guy.
And with 7 alive, 4 to lynch.

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:21 pm
by Nai
Well, with that, I think our doc is really lucky. That would explain the lack of kills night one. Though I can't understand why the SK didn't attack him.

If we're still going with my plan, I'm suspicious of the three masons. However, we ARE in lynch-or-lose, sadly. I KNOW that I'm safe. I know that BJ is safe. Unless Nanook is NOT in the mason group and the mafia pulled him in (with his lack of posting) as a flunky (A play I'd make if Nanook was as idle as he is now), that just leaves them. I'll prefer to go with Bloojay for being the first counterclaimer.

Vote: Bloojay

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:33 pm
by rajrhcpfreak
wtf?

its not the doc. i blocked night kills those two nights.....

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:56 pm
by BabyJesus
Nai wrote:Well, with that, I think our doc is really lucky.
Being killed N2?

I agree, lets test this "mason" group. I would prefer to test Tamuz though....

vote Tamuz

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:07 pm
by Nai
Hell, Stark could be a doc for all we know. Though it's good that we know you did it. Without you saying something before hand, how are we to know?

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:42 pm
by stark
mmm, nai, post 444 is not so much making sense. and no, im not a doc, or cop, or anything of the sort. i said this alot earlier. im doris day, invested with powers of total vanillaness. also nai, raj did say that he could sing his protest songs. it made absolute sense to sing last night, considering he would probably be the target for scum attack. i am also interested to test our supposed mason group.
vote: tamuzi

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:40 pm
by Nai
You could STILL be a doc lying to us to save his skin.